Panel "regional kanji", Kanken Japan Kanji Museum, photographed by me, ca. 2019

As this is a Han-Katakana hybrid (⿸广⿱タカ taka = U+9DF9 鷹), would it be more appropriate to include it in the proposed "Script-Hybrid CJK Ideographs" block?

Personally, I am OK with encoding script-hybrid CJK ideographs as ordinary CJK unified ideographs, so I am not opposed to encoding UTC-03391, but I am concerned that it is inconsistent with the proposed treatment of similar hybrid characters in L2/24-201.

The case of WS2024-01351 is similar, with 广 (Han) + 龴 (Katakana). Therefore, it should also be included in the discussion.

kStrange K:U+30AB:U+30BF

I completely understand not accepting script-hybrid Han ideographs that include Latin or Hiragana components at this time, but there are already CJK Unified Ideographs that include Katakana components, and even one whose components are all Katakana. In such cases, and as in the proposed ideograph, the Katakana components are manifested as Han components. Katakana are derived from Han components.

Script-hybrid Katakana + Han:

U+2B9A4: Reading = カイチ (ka + ichi); Components = カ (K) + 一 (Han); See MJ057059




U+2B9AB: Reading = カタナ (ka + ta + na); Components = カ (K) + 田 (Han) + ナ (K); See MJ057066




All Katakana:

U+2BCCD: Reading = ウツホ (u + tsu + ho); Components = ウ (K) + ツ (K) + ホ (K); See MJ057333




As an aside, the following ideograph in Extension F is a Hiragana ligature:

U+2CF00: Reading = して (shi + te); Components = し (H) + て (H); See MJ056854

See Comment #10825 in #01144.

01144

尸 44.2.4

UTC-03390

TS 5 · IDS ⿸尸丷