Character Info
03445
 TE-3048 |
Evidence accepted, IDS=⿱艹旗, 2023-04.
Not unified to 𦻬 U+26EEC, evidence accepted, glyph not changed.
Not unified to 𦻬 U+26EEC, evidence accepted, glyph not changed.
Similar To: 𦻬 (U+26EEC)
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #57 2021-09-16 (Thu) 8:38 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𦻬 U+26EEC, Evidence accepted, glyph no change. |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 2.0 | For 03445, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𦻬 U+26EEC, evidence accepted, glyph not changed." |
| 5.0 | For 03445, change IDS to ⿱艹旗 |
| 5.0 | For 03445, add Discussion Record "Evidence accepted, IDS=⿱艹旗, 2023-04." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| TE-3048 | 1.0 |
Raw Info
| group | TCA |
| a) Source reference | TE-3048 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | E292 |
| c) KangXi Radical Code | 140.0 |
| e) Stroke Count | 14 |
| f) First Stroke | 4 |
| g) Total stroke count | 18 |
| i) IDS | ⿱卝旗 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | U+26EEC |
| k) Ref. to Evidence doc | IRGN2486_TCA_WS2021_evi_02 |
| k1) Page No. | Page13, no.662 |
| l) Optional info | qí |
Review Comments
▲ 李昉等：《文苑英華》，文淵閣四庫全書本，卷七百七十四
寶善堂彙藳
Other than the minor difference in shape of radical 140, how is this different from U+26EEC? Is the given radical correct?
unify to 𦻬 (U+26EEC) possibly?
Agree with Lee's comment at #2014.
The origin of this character is a name character, and we cannot change it at will. If we change it to [艹], the character will not be used on the ID card, so we are creating a character that no one uses, and we are losing the intent of the character we submitted.
Please see IRGN2546 for more information on the normalization of the TCA glyph.
▲ 广东省兴宁县政协文史资料研究委员会: 《兴宁文史 第21辑 罗斧月专辑》, 1996.11, p. 112