▲ 《明倫彙編家範典》，古今圖書集成本，第二十卷

三國志旁證

The radical is 140, but the IDS uses 卝 (guàn, kuàng) which is not related semantically. Can the glyph and IDS be normalized to ⿱艹閣?

Normalize to ⿱艹閣

卝 is a common variant of Radical 140.0 艸, please see the picture below.

(https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/variants/rbt/radical_tiles.rbt?pageId=2981943)

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

According to the naming ACT, we should keep the name glyph that people register.

The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹閣. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹閣 may be separately encoded in the future.

ISO/IEC 10646 and the Unicode Standard are not glyph registers. The glyph should be normalized following TCA conventions regardless of the use of one individual person.

According to UCV#152, ⿱艹閣 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝閣 the primary IDS and ⿱艹閣(or 〾⿱艹閣) as the secondary IDS.

We agree that "ISO/IEC 10646 and the Unicode Standard are not glyph registers." It is a character-based register, and each character is allowed to have a different glyph, which is why ISO/IEC 10646 codes are presented in multiple columns.
The origin of this character is a name character, and we cannot change it at will. If we change it to [艹], the character will not be used on the ID card, so we are creating a character that no one uses, and we are losing the intent of the character we submitted.
Please see IRGN2546 for more information on the normalization of the TCA glyph.