田野村忠温, 〈中国初期英語学習書における英語発音の漢字表記 : 流音の知覚と表記〉https://ir.library.osaka-u.ac.jp/repo/ouka/all/72103/mgsl059_221.pdf, 《大阪大学大学院文学研究科紀要》2019, 59, p. 221-279.

According to what is stated in the paper, it is written as "㕱".

Re Comment #1061, I think the use of 㕱 in the paper must be a mistake or approximation because the actual character is not encoded so not available in the font. 𭀖 is a vulgar form of U+5398 厘 used in Cantonese (see e.g. GlyphWiki and jyut.net), and the character 𭀖 without a 口 radical is also used for in the sources cited in the UK submission for English 'ri' or 're'. There is no doubt that the character in the original sources is not 㕱 yóu, which would make no sense phonetically.

Maybe Cantonese reading is li1.