UTC-03479 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #64 2025-03-19 (Wed) 10:37 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Unified to 躔 U+8E94 |
Version | Description |
---|---|
3.0 | For 03680, change Status to Unified |
3.0 | For 03680, add Discussion Record "Unified to 躔 U+8E94, IRG 64." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UTC-03479 |
Character Reference | UTC-03479 |
Codepoint | F596 |
Radical | 157 |
Stroke Count | 14 |
First Stroke | 1 |
Total Stroke | 21 |
IDS | ⿰𧾷𠪨 |
Variants | U+8E94 |
Pronunciation | N/A |
Total No. of Evidences | 2 |
Notes | N/A |
Review Comments
Unify to 躔 (U+8E94) with new UCV?
I also agree to unify to 躔 (U+8E94). As the co-author of the original proposal to add this character to UAX#45, when preparing the proposal, I have already told the first author that this character would most likely to be unified, and I suggest U-source just do an horizontal extension.
The proposed UCV 廛/𠪨 was also discussed in the link above. For reference here is Kushim's comment in that thread on the application rate of this UCV:
<blockquote>
For 𠪨~廛:
𧓋 (C12501) ~ 𧔊 (C12501-001)
𧸪 (C13655-002) ~ 𧸳 (C13655)
𨞬 ~ 鄽 (GHZR: 4054.04)
⿰金𠪨 (C15168-002) ~ 𨮻 (C15168)
⿰𧾷𠪨 (B04971-005) ~ 躔 (B04971)
⿵門𠪨 (C15366-001) ~ 𨷠 (TB-2215) 𨷭 (TB-2219)
⿺走𠪨 (C13847-002) ~ 𧾡 (C13847)
So it's okay to add UCV 𠪨~廛.
</blockquote>
In IRG #61, there were different opinions about this UCV. It will be great if we can reach consensus this time.
This one has not been unified to 躔 (U+8E94) yet.