Personal name usage is no reason not to normalize the glyph to conform to TCA conventions. I still believe that the grass radical should be normalized.

The origin of this character is a name character, and we cannot change it at will. If we change it to [艹], the character will not be used on the ID card, so we are creating a character that no one uses, and we are losing the intent of the character we submitted.
Please see IRGN2546 for more information on the normalization of the TCA glyph.

The complete source name of the evidence provided in comment #1999 should be《雜集時用要字》(Дx02822) from the Russian Dunhuang collections.


▲ 敦煌經部文獻合集.小學類字書之屬（中華書局, 2008, ISBN 9787101060355）pp. 4231

In the new evidence, 張湧泉 considers ⿱蒜心 as a variant of 蒜.