Regarding comment #659, the glyph shown in 直音篇 has 卓 as its left bottom component, rather than 𠦝.
Since both characters are variants of 乾 and are derived from 直音篇, TCA agrees to unify and add a horizontal extension to 𰋮 (U+302EE).
The glyph source for U+2E39F is G-Source.
TCA is uncertain whether the bottom component of this character is [月] or not. If it is indeed [月], TCA agrees with this unification.
Disagree with the unification with 冀 (U+5180). The submitted character is an independent character, not a part of another character, and therefore should not be unified directly.
TCA has no objection to the merger of UCV#278 and 465, but hopes to encode WS2024-04254: Regarding the right-hand part of the character form, 曼 is the standard character, while 㬅, 𭦗, and ⿳日罒万 are all vulgar forms of 曼. However, in this set of relationships, ⿰馬曼 is to be unified with ⿰馬㬅, which means the standard form is being unified with a variant form. Logically, the standard form should take precedence over variant forms.
玆 and 茲 have often been used interchangeably in later periods. The following four pieces of evidence are provided for reference. Based on this, it is suggested to keep the unification with 滋 and ⿰氵玆.
The submitted evidences show both ⿱山土 (Evidence 1, 3 context, 4, 6) and U+24BD3 𤯓 (Evidence 2, 3 note 3, 5).
𤯓() is a variant of 生, while ⿱山土 seems to be a variant of 主. Although these two forms are similar, they have different meanings.
Based on the context of Evidence 1, the submitted form is a variant of 主.
丁福保編《說文解字诂林》, p5292. (the small seal form is )
Btw, the original rubbing of 日本陸奧天王寺碑跋, mentioned in Evidence 4, shows the form as 𤯓 or 生.
《集古十種》碑銘 八 陸奥國信夫郡飯坂天王寺山中碑(諸行無常 是生滅法 生滅……)
Thank you for the information.
Currently, no evidence has been found for the character written as ⿰口璿. The submitted character form is consistent with Evidence 1.
The submitted character represents drawer. In addition, according to 吳守禮 綜合臺灣閩南語基本字典初稿 (the comment #5497), the submitted character and 㔸 both mean drawer. Since 㔸 belongs to Radical 23.0 (匸), TCA will update the glyph with ⿷匸拖 and Radical to 23.0 (匸), SC=8, FS=1.
吳守禮《國臺對照活用辭典》also includes ⿰只个(WS2024-00394), with the last stroke also written without a hook. Therefore, for consistency, this glyph is written as 个 without a hook. Additionally, judging from its pronunciation (ㄏㆤ/he), it is likely derived from 个 (ㆤˊ/ê).
IRG Working Set 2024v1.0
Source: Conifer TSENG
Date: Generated on 2026-08-19
Unification
Showing 24 comments.
Unify to 𱧅 (U+319C5). (UCV#123 巳㔾)
These two characters are variants of 滄.
段玉裁《說文解字注》5卷上
血 is written as ⿱一皿.
Unify to 血.
Regarding comment #659, the glyph shown in 直音篇 has 卓 as its left bottom component, rather than 𠦝.
Since both characters are variants of 乾 and are derived from 直音篇, TCA agrees to unify and add a horizontal extension to 𰋮 (U+302EE).
Add a horizontal extension to (U+33249) (WS2021-04301).
Add a horizontal extension to (U+3325A) (WS2021-04318).
The glyph source for U+2E39F is G-Source.
TCA is uncertain whether the bottom component of this character is [月] or not. If it is indeed [月], TCA agrees with this unification.
Agree to unify to u+227E8. And suggest adding a new UCV rule 莽/莾.
These two characters have completely different radicals.
玆 and 茲 have often been used interchangeably in later periods. The following four pieces of evidence are provided for reference. Based on this, it is suggested to keep the unification with 滋 and ⿰氵玆.
(1)李守奎，〈古音研究中應當注意的幾個文字問題〉，《饒宗頤國學院院刊》第六期，2019年8月，p.178-181.
(2) 《漢語大字典》亠部「玆」, P316-317.
(3)《玉篇》(嘉慶19年重修本)卷之一 平聲．七之．津之切，”[⿰氵玆]……說文益也。…..”
(4) MOE Variant Dict. A02274-008
The shape of the submitted character is almost exactly like 𢬧(U+22B27), so it's recommended to unify it with 𢬧 (U+22B27).
Unify to 𰜶 (U+30736). (UCV #307d)
Attributes
Showing 20 comments.
If needed, add 109.0 目 as a secondary radical. TCA has no objection to this.
粵=U+7CB5
Evidence
Showing 92 comments.
𤯓(
Based on the context of Evidence 1, the submitted form is a variant of 主.
丁福保編《說文解字诂林》, p5292. (the small seal form is
Btw, the original rubbing of 日本陸奧天王寺碑跋, mentioned in Evidence 4, shows the form as 𤯓 or 生.
《集古十種》碑銘 八 陸奥國信夫郡飯坂天王寺山中碑(諸行無常 是生滅法 生滅……)
Another source also gives [山節]:
http://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newchar/list_view.jsp?code=159954
Please confirm if the upper right part of the character is [艹](grass) or [𥫗](bamboo) ?
Currently, no evidence has been found for the character written as ⿰口璿. The submitted character form is consistent with Evidence 1.
According to what is stated in the paper, it is written as "㕱".
https://www.town.onga.lg.jp/uploaded/attachment/5774.pdf
町報かわにし 2024年2月號, P4.
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 10 comments.
The glyph is not match the evidence.
If it's meant to be [宝], then the IDS should be changed to ⿱宀𬍼.
Please confirm whether the right component should be 火 or 大
.
台語正字, p36.
▼龍龕手鏡(高麗本), 石部, p440.
▼龍龕手鑑四卷(影宋鈔本)
TCA will update the font to match the evidence, and IDS change to ⿱艹⿸雁鳥.
Other
Showing 3 comments.
The right-upper part of the character in the evidence gives ⿱夫日, and the annotation gives ⿱夫目. Both are attested variants of 春.
TCA will update the font (the right-upper part gives ⿱夫日) to match the evidence.
𬙬 is a variant character that represents both 算 and 筭.
Submitter Request
Showing 1 comments.