Per document IRG N2709, this particular ideograph is officially being proposed as a UNC by TCA, and if accepted during the IRG #63, it should be removed from this working set. As stated in Comments #1814, China can submit a horizontal proposal after Unicode Version 17.0 has been released (2025). If the ideograph is considered urgent for China, which I suspect it is not given that it is in an IRG working set, China can submit a UNC proposal.

It may be unifiable with 𰀾 (U+3003E). Henry's comment for 00083 in the ORT for IRG Working Set 2015 suggests that U+3003E is cognate with U+8FFA, which is claimed to be a synonym (aka cognate) of this ideograph.

This is U+32FF7 in the DRAFT Extension J code chart.

This ideograph is a disunification of U+6ECB 滋 that also affects U+FA99 滋. If accepted, the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FA99, KP1-52B4, should be moved to the new code point, the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FA99 should be changed to KPU-0FA99, and the kIRG_USource property value of U+6ECB, UTC-00777, should be removed.

Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.

My personal opinion is that until someone—or a member body—prepares and submits a formal proposal to create a new CJK Components (or similar) block, we should continue to encode radical-like components as CJK Unified Ideographs.

Agreed to unification if they are indeed cognate.

Agree to unify with 縠 (U+7E20).

My personal opinion is that until someone—or a member body—prepares and submits a formal proposal to create a new CJK Components (or similar) block, we should continue to encode radical-like components as CJK Unified Ideographs.

This ideograph is a disunification of U+7DF4 練 that also affects U+FAB0 練. If accepted, the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FAB0, KP1-671B, should be moved to the new code point, and the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FAB0 should be changed to KPU-0FAB0. As with the most recent disunification, Japan will not want to move the kIRG_JSource property value of U+7DF4, J0-4E7D, to the new code point due to compatibility concerns.

Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.

This ideograph is a disunification of U+233D5 𣏕 that also affects U+FAD1 𣏕. If accepted, the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FAD1, KP1-4B26, should be moved to the new code point, and the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FAD1 should be changed to KPU-0FAD1.

Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.

This ideograph is a disunification of U+5F50 彐 and U+2B739 𫜹.

Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.

To mirror Vietnam's comments in 02657, this ideograph should not be unified with 𠯇 (U+20BC7), because the phonetic components, 己 (kỷ) and 已 (dĩ), are very different. UTC-03296 would therefore be non-cognate with U+20BC7 in Vietnamese.

Agree with Comment #611.

If the IRG decides to unify, a new UCV should be added per Comment #305.

If the IRG decides to unify, a new UCV should be added per Comment #306.

While I agree that the abstract shape is the same, there is a significant structural difference that requires discussion before unification can be considered.

I agree with the potential unification, but it needs to be discussed.

It may be difficult to prove that these two ideographs are cognate.

A new UCV requires discussion.

Disagree with unification.

If the IRG unifies, UCV #408 needs to be updated.

The person who submitted this ideograph to the UTC pointed out that U+2B7B9 in the Extension D block is a disunification example. My own checking found that U+2D5FB in the Extension F block, which appears to be cognate with 巠 (U+5DE0) according to the Moji Jōhō Kiban database, is another example.

If they are non-cognate, they should not be unified.

Agree with unification.

Agree with unification.

Agree with Comment #142.

Agree with unification.

Agree with unification.

18

24

8

11

16

14

2

17

2 (for Radical 108)

9

14

9

15

8

12

12

2

8

4

13

3

10

15

7

3

13

1

Agree with Comment #874.

Change Radical to 29.0 (又), SC=7, FS=3

11

1

17

1

Change Radical to 75.0 (木), SC=16, FS=4

Change Radical to 85.0 (水), SC=18, FS=2

14

2

19

1

12

16

Change Radical to 168.1 (长), SC=6, FS=5

㇯𠚡舀

⿰王瞿

Add 19.0 (力), SC=5, FS=2 as secondary radical.

Add Radical 212.0 (龍), SC=6, FS=3 as a secondary radical.

⿱竹壐

15

12

17

2

20

⿱艹⿺黑犬

11

2

16

2

⿰糸𢽠 (shorter is better)

2

13

19

5

12

2

17

⿰禾𮂬

20

⿱⿸麻比米

7

12

11

Change Radical to 1.0 (一), SC=5, FS=5

11

5

13

16

5

5?

10?

1

2

11

1

17

20

11

16

2

Change Radical to 140.0 (艸), SC=12, FS=2; keep 103 (SC=11, FS=2) as secondary radical

12

18

16

21

2

12

17

1

3

9

13

⿳厶⿲刃工刃⿳一𭕄口 (the 6th and 9th components were changed)

2

4 (per IRG N954AR page 6)

10

16

To clarify Comment #608, the submitted IDS used U+3119 ㄙ BOPOMOFO LETTER S as a component, and the suggested change is to use U+53B6 厶.

10

14

8

4

13

14

19

2

8

Change Radical to 67.0 (文), SC=5, FS=3

SC=8 and TS=12 were correct.

13

18

16

I recommend swapping the primary and secondary radicals.

I feel that Radical #151 would be the better primary radical.

The secondary radical does not seem to be necessary.

The secondary radical doesn't seem to be necessary.

⿻𫜹丨

Change Radical to 58.0 (彐), SC=1, FS=2

Change Radical to 22.0 (匚), SC=2, FS=1

2

Agree with having two radical values: 167.5 (FS=2) and 102.8 (FS=3)

9

The UTC agrees with the IDS correction (what was in the submission was in error).

Add 61.0 as secondary radical (SC=55, FS=4).

Add 61.0 as secondary radical (SC=27, FS=4).

10

2

14

10

13

Agree with IDS change: ⿰山川

14

2

18

Agree with Comment #5459 about updating the IDS: ⿱艹冦

8

2

11

7

10

2 (secondary radical)

The secondary radical does not seem to be necessary (and is not intuitive).

Add Radical 50.0 (巾), SC=13, FS=1 as secondary radical.

Agree with UK Comment #787.

10

15

Yes. My mistake. I will delete other similar comments.

15

20

⿱𭕄弄 (the second component was changed from U+2E8D ⺍ CJK RADICAL SMALL TWO to U+2D544 𭕄)

⿴八离

16

The secondary radical doesn't seem to be necessary.

10 (secondary radical)

Radical #10 seems like the better primary radical.

22

⿱艹⿱⿱亼𭕄貝 (the sixth component was changed from U+2E8D ⺍ CJK RADICAL SMALL TWO to U+2D544 𭕄)

9?

14?

11

16

The secondary radical does not seem to be necessary.

16

13

3

19

Change Radical to 117.0 (立), SC=11, FS=4

Change Radical to 129.0 (聿), SC=18, FS=2

Change Radical to 73.0 (曰), SC=12, FS=3

29

The second evidence image seems to include 夾 as a component.

We will try to find printed evidence.

The person who submitted this ideograph to the UTC provided this evidence image, which is from the Meiji era. It shows that it is a variant of U+62DC, which in turn is a variant of U+62DD.

《遠賀町誌PDF．第二章　町勢のうごき》, p34.

閉鎖登記簿 (Land registration record, which was used until computerization in 2007)

旧土地台帳 (Land registration record, which was used from the Meiji era to the 1960s)

The ideograph is not identified in the evidence image (though it is easy to find).

The fifth stroke does not adhere to China's regional conventions. It should not be a connecting vertical stroke, but rather a dot.

The sixth stroke, being vertical, does not adhere to the regional conventions of China.

The right component is missing a dot that is in the evidence. Is this is what is meant by normalized?

The four horizontal strokes of the 雨 component do not adhere to ROK regional standards.

The four horizontal strokes of the 雨 component do not adhere to ROK regional standards.

The four horizontal strokes of the 雨 component do not adhere to ROK regional standards.

The four horizontal strokes of the 雨 component do not adhere to ROK regional standards.

The four horizontal strokes of the 雨 component do not adhere to ROK regional standards.

The structure of the glyph in the evidence images looks like ⿹彧虫. If the representative glyph is changed, the IDS should be changed as provided in the previous sentence.

The UTC shall submit an updated glyph for Version 2.0. The UTC also agrees with the suggested IDS change in Review Comment #583.

The UTC will updated the representative glyph to normalize the left component per Comment #5462.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

Per document IRG N2748, the representative glyph for this ideograph will be updated for Version 2.0.

The source reference for this ideograph, GDM-00377, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B80B 𫠋 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00434, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B74B 𫝋 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00435, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B767 𫝧 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00436, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B768 𫝨 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00437, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B76A 𫝪 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00438, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B785 𫞅 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00439, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7A2 𫞢 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00440, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7A7 𫞧 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00441, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7B7 𫞷 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00442, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7D1 𫟑 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00443, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7E0 𫟠 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00444, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7E2 𫟢 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00445, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7E5 𫟥 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00446, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7EB 𫟫 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00447, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7EC 𫟬 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00449, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7F5 𫟵 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00450, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7F6 𫟶 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00451, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B7F8 𫟸 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00452, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B801 𫠁 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00453, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B802 𫠂 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

The source reference for this ideograph, GXM-00454, conflicts with the new source reference for U+2B805 𫠅 in Unicode Version 16.0 per document IRG N2679.

Strongly agree with Comment #1509. This appears to be the only instance of this component in this working set. Radical #151 still serves as the best primary radical, but Radical #140 should be its secondary radical. The previous working set also had a single instance of this component, #03392, which specifies 140 as its radical, though in the current draft of the Extension J block, U+332B0, it serves as the secondary radical. For all previous blocks, I queued up feedback for making similar adjustments that will be targeted for Unicode Version 17.0 (2025), which was submitted today. This particular feedback prompted me to submit the feedback for previous blocks. In other words, Radical #140 will be set as either the primary or secondary radical when this component appears in an ideograph..

See IRG Working Set 2021 #765 for more evidence and discussion.

[WS2021-00765]

Link to KC-10302

The simplified form is in Extension I.

This ideograph was withdrawn from IRG Working Set 2015 as 02145.

This ideograph was withdrawn from IRG Working Set 2015 as 04429.

This ideograph was withdrawn from IRG Working Set 2017 as 04899.

This character is in China's document IRG N2733R. See A198 on page 10.

The reading of こっとい is the result of the person who submitted the ideograph to UAX #45 making a personal enquiry to the Kyotango City Hall tax department (京丹後市役所税務課) by telephone on 2021-07-13. While there are no published literature sources that confirm this reading, the Kyotango City Hall responded that the reading of the place name 歩⿰牛化 is ほごっとい. Therefore, the reading of ⿰牛化 is likely to be こっとい.

While this comment has nothing to do with the submitted ideograph, I am curious as to why U+3004 〄 JAPANESE INDUSTRIAL STANDARD SYMBOL appears on the third line from the bottom.

U+6563 散

How are U+5EFF and the proposed new ideograph semantically related?

U+9C78 鱸




U+9C88 鲈

U+86A9 蚩

U+6AD3 櫓

U+8D70 走




U+27E86 𧺆

U+855D 蕝

U+2B235 𫈵

U+5C41 屁

U+9A30 騰

U+9D1F 鴟

U+6E62 湢

U+31EA3 𱺣

U+31EA3 𱺣

U+32053 𲁓

UTC-03294

02742

示 113.8.1

UTC-03294

TS 12 · IDS ⿰礻规

U+20DE9 𠷩

U+3E57 㹗

U+24EFC 𤻼

U+255D9 𥗙

U+42C1 䋁

U+7DED 緭

U+3E93 㺓

U+259E1 𥧡

U+26005 𦀅

U+26253 𦉓

U+4392 䎒

U+25FEE 𥿮

U+2619F 𦆟

U+7D4F 絏

U+7466 瑦

U+2524A 𥉊

U+2AFF4 𪿴

U+2E059 𮁙

U+40F9 䃹

U+7D3B 紻

U+26073 𦁳

U+8397 莗

U+862D 蘭

U+24A73 𤩳

U+430D 䌍

U+7D91 綑

U+42EE 䋮

U+2E00A 𮀊

U+30ACE 𰫎

U+3085F 𰡟

U+30A80 𰪀

U+30CDF 𰳟

U+30D13 𰴓

U+40F9 䃹

U+30AA2 𰪢

U+7917 礗

U+27E29 𧸩

UTC-03293

02758

示 113.11.1

UTC-03293

TS 15 · IDS ⿰礻規

U+9BED 鯭

U+2A0B9 𪂹

U+9BD1 鯑

U+29D7C 𩵼

U+4C3C 䰼

U+4C38 䰸

U+9B69 魩

U+29ECF 𩻏

U+29F4F 𩽏

U+29D53 𩵓

U+9B72 魲

U+9C19 鰙

U+29F0E 𩼎

U+29E0E 𩸎

U+29F46 𩽆

U+4C35 䰵

U+29DB8 𩶸

U+4C55 䱕

U+2CD4F 𬵏

U+2B66E 𫙮

U+9B94 鮔

U+29D97 𩶗

U+29E8C 𩺌

U+2B672 𫙲

U+4C54 䱔

U+9C71 鱱

U+2B681 𫚁

U+29F3A 𩼺

U+9B70 魰

U+29EF8 𩻸

U+9C0E 鰎

U+29DDA 𩷚

U+29E76 𩹶

U+9C38 鰸

U+282CD 𨋍

U+21075 𡁵

U+248BA 𤢺

U+25CF5 𥳵

U+42A7 䊧

U+2604E 𦁎

U+4376 䍶

U+4CCB 䳋

U+4862 䡢

U+49A0 䦠

U+9A63 驣

U+29E72 𩹲

U+4C83 䲃

U+4CA6 䲦

U+2A1F1 𪇱

U+29FE8 𩿨