1) Add ⿰击頁~頓 as UCV pair as Lv. 1 and unify this one to 頓. This one has been included in the CAAPH backup repertoire. We can add it to CAAPH IVS collection in future.
2) Only encode ⿰击頁 separately, but add ⿰击頁~頓 as UCV pair as Lv. 1.
[Mr. Ma Shijie provided the comments, but what he wrote is not clear enough. Eiso rewrites after studying.]
The submitted character related to one word 醇～ on the evidence, which should be the variant form of the word 淳龐, that means the local people are honest and warm-hearted or the local customs are simple and homely. This is a stable word.
U+5390 厐 is the variant of 龐 or 龎. The only barrier is that we don’t have the UCV or any rule to support the unification.
As Andrew’s comment under WS2021-02524 (#14133), these two should be unified and the discussion record showed “China may propose horizontal extension noted, IRG 62”.
[The following comment is raised by Mr. Ma Shijie.]
Add this one and U+31ECC 𱻌 to UCV as Lv. 2?
Noted by Eiso:
This one is the variant of 義 (zh:yì; yue:ji6; vi:nghĩa), and U+31ECC 𱻌 is the variant of 羕 (zh:yàng; yue:joeng6; vi:dàng, dạng), that means they are non-cognates, but they could be interchanged to use as the components.
JMJ-032252 has been unified to 𠲙 (U+20C99) since Unicode, 16.0.0, and the JMJ-032252 glyph is the same as current GHZ-10623.10 glyph to match Kangxi Dictionary (同文書局本).
However, 康熙五十五年武英殿本 shows the same glyph as VN-F007E (different from the glyph mentioned in Comment #5705).
Kangxi Dictionary shows this character is cited from 《搜真玉鏡》. Maybe we need to check 《搜真玉鏡》 if possible. And, Japan NB should consider how to handle this one.
Based on Lee’s Comment #10774, VN-F048E is really the variant of U+8021 耡 without V-Source reference now (maybe VN-08021 in future). The right parts, 𦔳 and 助 are also the variant pair. U+26533 𦔳 was submitted by TCA and Vietnam did the horizontal extension later. This one is also included in GCA list as one GCA-F one with the same meaning as TCA.
According to China conventions, the top of 全 is Radical #9 (人), but the left part is the real 全. And the radical of 全 is Radical #11 (入). This is the reason why we keep Radical #9.
Based on three pieces of evidence (2 submitted and 1 new), the glyph should be ⿵门⿱𰁜大 not ⿵门奕. Evidence 1 shows the Putonghua reading is luán, that means the top of the inside part is 𰁜, the variant of 䜌 not 亦.
In PRC conventions, 𰁜 and 亦 are not the same. So, the theoretical traditional form should be ⿵門⿱䜌大 not ⿵門奕.
The meaning of this character is “to go, to walk, to run” (去). So, the semantic element is 去, the phonetic element is 比 (老借 beij <Cantonese: bei2>; 新借 bij). The final of 比 belongs to 止攝 in Middle Chinese.
Note 批 reads bae in 老借 (新借 bih), but the final of 批 belongs to 蟹攝 in Middle Chinese.
Therefore, the Radical #28.0 is right, but it is not intuitive. It is OK to use 81.0 as the primary radical, 28.0 as the secondary radical.
This character means “time(s)”. The semantic element is 次, and the phonetic is 皮 (老借 beiz, 新借 biz).
The RS value of 次 is 76.2, but 欠 is in the middle. For 次, the original form the left part is 二. See T1-4839 and K0-732D. It is better to add one new rule for 次 (1 or 4) in SC and FS guidelines.
The suggested solution is below.
1) Change Radical to 107.0 (皮) from 15.0 (冫), SC=6, FS=4 or 1
2) Add 76.0 (欠) as the secondary radical, SC=7, FS=4 or 1
Add the secondary radical as 142.0 (虫), SC=8, FS=1
For the structure ⿲王X王, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) the radical of X, 2) 玉
Rad=the rad of X
U+6591 斑 (S=文, P=班省)
U+28325 𨌥 (S=車 and 珏/𤤴/玨/朋)
Rad=玉
U+73ED 班
U+2493B 𤤻 (var. of 班)
U+249A6 𤦦 (var. of 班)
U+2AEEE 𪻮
U+2DE5A 𭹚 (var. of 班)
U+2DE5E 𭹞 (var. of 斑)
U+30880 𰢀 (var. of 班)
U+30881 𰢁 (var. of 班)
This character shared the Zhuang word with U+307DD 𰟝, and reads as raeg.
For U+307DD 𰟝, the phonetic element is 勒 (reads as laeg in 老借), and the semantic element is 灭(<滅).
For this character, the component 光 is related to 灭, but how about 而? The 音韻地位 for 而 is 日母止攝開口三等之韻平聲. I have not collected the 老借 form of 而 (the 新借 form is wz), but we can get the probable form is ngaez (耳 reads ngaex). That means it is hard to say 而 is the direct phonetic element, and 光 must not be the phonetic element as well.
In 《古壮字字典》 (p. 421), 而 is also used to record the Zhuang word rieg (“to take off one set or piece of clothing and put on a fresh one”). The Zhuang word rieg is close to raeg.
All in all, it is better to keep this radical and add 126.0 (而) as the secondary one.
For the structure ⿱玨X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) 玉, 2) the radical of component X
Rad=玉
U+73E1 珡 (variant of 琴)
U+7434 琴 (musical instrument)
U+7435 琵 (musical instrument)
U+7436 琶 (musical instrument)
U+7439 琹 (variant of 琴)
U+745F 瑟 (musical instrument)
U+24996 𤦖
U+24997 𤦗
U+249C2 𤧂 (variant of 琴)
U+249C6 𤧆 (variant of 琴)
U+24A0D 𤨍
U+24A58 𤩘
U+24A5F 𤩟 (variant of 琴)
U+2AEF4 𪻴 (variant of 琴 and 珍)
U+2B73B (musical instrument)
U+2DE65 𭹥 (musical instrument + variant of 筑)
U+2DE78 𭹸 (musical instrument + variant of 箜)
U+2DE92 𭺒
U+2DE95 𭺕
U+30877 𰡷 (variant of 琴)
U+30886 𰢆 (variant of 琴)
U+30887 𰢇 (variant of 琴)
U+3088C 𰢌 (variant of 琴)
U+31BD0 𱯐 (variant of 柬)
U+32BDE (variant of 拜)
Rad=the rad of X
U+22708 𢜈 (variant of 琴 and 慧)
U+235DC 𣗜 (variant of 琴)
U+28A16 𨨖 (variant of 琴)
U+2ABE5 𪯥 (variant of 斑 and 瑟)
U+2D310 𭌐
U+2D481 𭒁 (variant of 瑟)
U+2D8D1 𭣑
U+327D7 (variant of 弄)
Based on the evidence, the semantic element is 算, and the phonetic element is 力 (老借 lig, 新借 liz), but this character is also used to record the Zhuang word “diet” (iron).
For this case, the semantic element is 做, the phonetic element is 乞 (老借 haet, Cantonese is hat1; 新借 giz), so the radical 人 is from the right part 做, that means FS=3 is better to match the first stroke of 乞.
For this case, the semantic element is 作, the phonetic element is 乞 (老借 haet, Cantonese is hat1; 新借 giz), so the radical 人 is from the right part 作, that means FS=3 is better to match the first stroke of 乞.
This character means round bead, and 員 is the special variant of 圓 (員通圓, such as 《後漢書·張衡列傳》：員徑八尺), so the semantic element is 員, and the phonetic element is 皮.
Keep the current one, and add 107.0 (皮) as the secondary one.
宣化 is a common geographic name in the history of China. This piece of evidence means current 河北省张家口市宣化区 and 阳原县, other places means current 甘肃省张掖市 (aka 甘州), 广西壮族自治区南宁市市区 and 邕宁区 and so on.
The place mentioned in the evidence are written as 籍箕疃 now.
▲ 中国国家地名信息库
▲ 池涌: 《故事阳原》, 石家庄: 河北美术出版社, 2018.8, ISBN 978-7-5310-9283-4, p. 60
The Zhuang reading of U+316B9 𱚹 is sux*. For the standard reading, the tone mark -x/-ч corresponds to 阳上 (John said this reading is used in Longzhou Zhuang), but the tone of 昼 should be 阴去 (-q/-ƽ). On the other hand, the middle Chinese finals (韵母) of 手 and 昼 are the same, and one 老借 reading of 手 I collected is suj; that 知母 reads as [s-]/[θ-] is very common. For common 腔词结合 rule in Cantonese Yueju Opera, Cantonese Yuequ Show and Cantonese pop songs, 阳上 (Tone 5) and 阴去 (Tone 3) could mean to the same musical scale, such as 上 (Gongche) for 平喉.
The semantic rationale of U+316B9 𱚹 in Zhuang and Tày is still NOT obvious. If it is the way like 臼 and 旧, 幺 and 么 to distinguish the meanings, the submitted glyph is acceptable; if we can not confirm this, it is better to change the glyph to match the evidence.
The evidence shows the person was 承文著作單 / 승문저작단 in 1786. And Comment #10841 shows 金驥燦 / 김기찬 was 承文副正字單 / 승문부정자단, 承文博士單 / 승문박사단 and so on in the same year.
The new evidence has been accepted, ROK could keep this character as-is.
The evidence shows the glyph is ⿱山⿰𫯝欠. ⿰𫯝欠 has not been encoded separately. But, ⿰𫯝欠 could be the variants of 款 and 疑. That means this character could be treated as ⿱山款 or U+5DB7 嶷 K1-6A47.
When we search 金命嶷, we can find the following results.
So, this character should not be identified as ⿱山款.
I suggest ROK confirm this issue.
Evidence
The person was 所斤僉使/소근첨사 in 1790. The following picture shows 金命嶷/김명의 was 所斤僉使/소근첨사 in 1790.
Compared these two materials, two personal names are different, one pair is 權～/권～ vs 權裻/권독, the other pair is 權衮/권곤 vs 權襄/권양. When we search 權～ or 權裻, there are both only one piece of result. But, we can get three pieces of results of 權襄, and only one for 權衮. Maybe 權襄 is the proper form.
We also need to confirm if the submitted character is the variant of U+88FB 裻.
The middle part looks like U+2A72C 𪜬, but ROK has not shown the KR Norm. rule here.
The person mentioned in the evidence is related to a government post: 金海府使 (김해부사). In the Wikipedia entry of 李光軾/이광식, he also once held this government post, and the link of 김해 is related to current 김해시 (金海市) under 경상남도 (慶尙南道).
부사 (府使) Wikipedia entry
부사(府事)는 주로 조선 시대에 지역 및 지방 행정구역의 수장으로 무관(武官)들이 임명되는 관직이었다.부사는 수령과 달리 군사적 요충지에 해당하는 행정구역을 주로 담당하였다.
When we search “金海府使”, we can get 620 entries in 承政院日記/승정원일기, and there are three entries related to the man named 柳鎭琡 (유진숙).
Evidence 2 shows the glyph as the similar variant of U+28082 𨂂. (⿰𧾷𬉹)
Also see Entry B04945-003 in Dictionary of Chinese Character Variants.
We can find several similar words in the database below.
乖盭 괴려
蹠盭 척려
舛盭 천려
謬盭 유려
違盭 위려
And, 灸 reads 구, 炙 reads 적. It is easy to know the materials mean 蹠盭 척려 as the same as B04945-003 shows.
If we treat Evidence 2 does not match the submitted glyph, and I have provided one more piece evidence, so maybe we can accept it as the stable error. We need to listen to more experts’ comments.
Note: There is no any referenceable example among the encoded characters.
The 疏 (소) in the submitted evidence was written by 趙得永 (조득영) in 1801. There is one more material recorded the 疏 (소) written by the same person in the same year with the similar content.
For Comment #11233, this piece of evidence is the same as WS2021-00315. This is one mistake, and that character should be 蒯. It is not better to use it.
▲ Thomas Chan, B. A.: “ORTHOGRAPHIC CHANGE: YUE (CANTONESE) CHINESE DIALECT CHARACTERS IN THE NINETEENTH AND TWENTIETH CENTURIES”, Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2001, p. 94
The second horizontal stroke (横) of the bottom left component 牛 should not be 避让 to become 提. The glyph shown on the evidence has been matched PRC conventions.
The Zhuang reading is gemq. The Zhuang reading of 剑 is giemq (老借), gen (新借). It is close to gemq.
莶 is not a very common character, and reads cim1 in Cantonese, so the closest Zhuang reading should be ciem (老借, the same as 签), which is not similar to gemq.
The Zhuang word coenggemq means Chinese chives (韭菜), and previous character is 萗 with Radical #140.0.
When I checked the person in other materials, the real name is 崔夢嵒 / 최몽암, so this character is one 類化字. That means the top component is not 4-stroke 艹, which is the same as the top component of U+5922 夢.
The evidence shows ⿰禾逹 or ⿰木逹. The submitter should show the normalization rule.
On the evidence, the previous sub-sentence shows “山稻種於乾田” (n./plant v. prep. n./place), so this sub-sentence shows “泉～種於寒水”, that means “泉～” is also a kind of plant. It is not easy to know what it is.
If TCA wants to normalize the glyph to ⿰口爓, that will be OK; if not, the current glyph could be kept. When other sources do the horizontal extension, ⿰口爓 could be unified here.
The evidence for this character and WS2021-03520 don’t show the usage for the geographic names, but the G-Source for this character is GDM. Could we need to know how to use this one for the geographic names?
The company looks important in TWMA (Taiwan Woodworking Machinery Association, 臺灣木工機械工業同業公會/台灣木工機械發展協會) and Woodworking Machinery Industry in Chinese Taiwan Province.
⿰元全 is also included in TCA-CNS 11643 as TC-6B48.
Suggest TCA ask the company or TWMA to confirm the reading, and change the source, glyph and IDS to match TC-6B48 without updating SC, FS, TS.
The traditional form ⿰口欒 has not been encoded yet.
For China, ⿰口欒 is included in ZHSJ PUA as U+F74FA, and zi.tools shows one source 《全宋金曲》卷九《張協狀元》第二齣.
For TCA, this is an important character in Southern Fujian (and Taiwanese) Puppet Opera (闽台木偶戏/閩臺木偶戲). TCA could check it in the real usage. (The translation principles are as follows: https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/655324771)
The phonetic element must be 韋 (viz? The 老借 form of 位 is vih, and the 新借 form of 韦 is veiz, and 位 is vei), but it is not easy to understand the semantic rationale of the right part 迷. 《古壮字字典》 shows two relative entries, one is used for the Zhuang word “maex” (wife), the other one is used for the Zhuang word “mwh” (period, time). On the other hand, the 老借 form of 迷 is maez, the 新借 form is miz.
If we can’t clarify the right part, it is better to keep current radical without more radicals.
The same as #134 mentioned in IRG N2799, but it is the real Hanzi. It is better to move it from the CJK component to new UNC or do the horizontal extension for U+2419B 𤆛.
Comment
*U+2FBC9 in IRG N2878R2, GCP-00127, TCP-01269, SAT-10292
The corresponding IDS(es) is/are shown as ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 and ⿰山气 in BabelStone, but only ⿰山气 in zi.tools.
However, ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 is the the variant of 屹, and the right part is also the variant of 乞. The final consonant (辅音韵尾) is -t. ⿳𠂉一乙 has not been encoded separately.
There is also one ⿰山气 in SJ/T 11239—2001 as 26-64.
The corresponding glyph of U+2AA26 𪨦 is also shown as ⿰山气 in GB 18030—2022 (0x9836CA34).
On the other hand, TC-2A6B looks related to A01101-004, but the glyph of A01101-004 shows ⿰山气, and the source shows ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 cited from 《正字通》.
UK-30010 looks related to ⿰山气, and the usage of UK-30010 supports ⿰山气.
In fact, the glyph shown on the evidence is ⿸厂⿰亻⿺專丶. And, the Vietnamese normalization is acceptable.
The Gin reading of this character is ʦiːn², the tone value is 21 in 𬇕尾, which corresponds to 阳平. As we know, some 𬇕尾 people reads the Hanzi derived from the Chinese Yue-sub-dialects in Southern Guangxi and Western Guangdong (桂南粤西).
In 桂南粤西, 传 reads ʦʰin¹¹ or ʦʰiŋ¹¹, because they didn’t need to distinguish the finals -in and -yun in Cantonese.
專 also reads ʦiːn¹ in 𬇕尾, that means this reading matches the analysis, which is similar to the Zhuang 老借 reading as cien. It reads chuyên in Vietnamese (A1).
We have not handled the numeric values for all the Chữ Nôm related to the Vietnamese word “rằm”.
U+2013B kVietnameseNumeric 5 15 # 𠄻, update
U+26743 kVietnameseNumeric 15 # 𦝃, new
U+26746 kVietnameseNumeric 15 # 𦝆, new
U+2AC6C kVietnameseNumeric 15 # 𪱬, new
U+2C0C2 kVietnameseNumeric 15 # 𬃂, new
U+3240B kVietnameseNumeric 15 # , new
We also need to handle the following issues.
For U+26743 𦝃, it is related to two words: ròm and rằm. The radical of ròm is 肉, and the radical of rằm is 月. There is one word used in Chinese Min-nan dialects for the meaning of “testicle”.
▲ TCA-CNS 11643-2007 (10-7940) uses the component moon
For U+26746 𦝆, it is related to three words: ròm, sần and rằm. The radical of ròm or sần is 肉, and the radical of rằm is 月.
▲ TCA-CNS 11643-2007 (10-7943) uses the component moon
IRG Working Set 2024v3.0
Source: Eiso CHAN
Date: Generated on 2026-08-19
Labels
Showing 713 comments.
Unification
Showing 59 comments.
U+7388 玈 = ⿰玄衣 (unencoded)
U+7963 祣 = U+2B00A 𫀊
U+22B1C 𢬜 = U+6314 挔
U+3B5A 㭚 ≠ U+2343F 𣐿
U+21705 𡜅 ≠ U+36C4 㛄
U+4B89 䮉 vs WS2021-04501:UK-20091 ⿰馬衣 (unclear)
unify to 𡄙 (U+21119) based on UCV #411?
𡄙 (U+21119) is the variant of 嘖.
▲ 吴承恩, 葛饰北斋: 《浮世绘插图版中国古典名著 西游记 中》, 长春: 吉林出版集团有限责任公司, 2012.4, ISBN 978-7-5463-8099-5, p. 546
▲ 杨义: 《民国通俗小说大系 三编 第74册》 (《北京师范大学图书馆藏民国通俗小说专辑》), 北京: 北京燕山出版社, 2022.12, ISBN 978-7-5402-6721-6, p. 28 (《新儿女英雄传》)
They are cognates.
If this UCV is accepted, I suggest China update the corresponding glyph in GB 18030.
GZ-1901501 shows the dialectal Zhuang reading is gi, and the 新借 reading of 吉 is giz (maybe the 老借 is gaet).
For U+25B45 𥭅, 全字庫 shows the reading is jí, but maybe it is also the variant of U+7B76 筶. TCA should confirm this issue.
unify to 芮 (U+82AE)?
The evidence Lee mentioned in Comment #10784 is shown below.
▲ Từ Điển Chữ Nôm Tày, p. 452
The Vietnamese meaning of this entry is “nhà” (家/茹) that means “home”, “house”.
U+5179 兹 🆚 U+8332 茲 (also UCV #153)
U+5914 夔 🆚 U+270F0 𧃰
U+5B73 孳 🆚 U+5B76 孶
U+5C70 屰 🆚 U+26B0F 𦬏 (possible)
U+20147 𠅇 🆚 U+8292 芒
U+20C25 𠰥 🆚 U+82E5 若
U+6148 慈 and U+2F8A6 慈
▲ 《杜山威等造像銘》, 唐·武周·天授二年
Support Comment #2717.
If Japan wants to move JMJ-003817 to the new code point, that will be acceptable in future.
It is OK to accept 㐄 and 牛 as lv. 2 UCV (not UCV #210), but this one should be encode separately.
Unify to WS2021-01240:SAT-06176 ⿱丶平?
These two characters are non-cognates based on the evidences, but they are too similar. We need to consider how to handle them.
Unify to 𠝧 (U+20767)?
They are both the semantic variant of 戮.
1) Add ⿰击頁~頓 as UCV pair as Lv. 1 and unify this one to 頓. This one has been included in the CAAPH backup repertoire. We can add it to CAAPH IVS collection in future.
2) Only encode ⿰击頁 separately, but add ⿰击頁~頓 as UCV pair as Lv. 1.
Identical to (U+2CEA4), this one should be removed from this WS.
unify to 厐 (U+5390)?
[Mr. Ma Shijie provided the comments, but what he wrote is not clear enough. Eiso rewrites after studying.]
The submitted character related to one word 醇～ on the evidence, which should be the variant form of the word 淳龐, that means the local people are honest and warm-hearted or the local customs are simple and homely. This is a stable word.
U+5390 厐 is the variant of 龐 or 龎. The only barrier is that we don’t have the UCV or any rule to support the unification.
unify to 𠃗 (U+200D7)?
The kKoreanName property value of U+200D7 𠃗 is 2015, and reads 울.
We needs more evidence to prove.
Unify to 甿 (U+753F) and add 亾兦 to UCV #143.
⿲亻丨匽 (J8152) vs 偃 (U+5043, M8156)
We has plan to add this pair to CAAPH IVD collection in future.
①Add new UCV for ⿱亠⿲[刀尸⿼㇇丶][了丫𬼸亻][𱍸氏⿺乀𰀪㇯𠂢𠂆⿱丿𡿨](RegEx).
U+20197 🆚 U+2018B
U+21141 🆚 U+21153
U+9F4A 🆚 U+2CE71 🆚 U+2EBBA
②Add new UCV for [⿵⿱]齊？(RegEx).
Different sources for U+9F4D
③Add new UCV for 齊 and ⿳亠⿲刀丫𱍸口.
Unify to 𬌼 (U+2C33C)
The following evidence shows the Japanese kunyomi reading of this one is also しゃぐま.
▲ 日本語を読むための漢字辞典 『和製漢字の辞典2014 犭部』
Unify to 𡐍?
SAT-09792 is the variant of 搜 as Comment #4773 shows.
𢲘 (U+22C98) is the variant of 探.
Unify to 㱿 (U+3C7F)?
We need a new UCV for 𡉉 and 𠕓 like UCV #222a.
Unify to 穅?
We should add 康𥹺 as the new UCV (lv. 2).
On the other hand, 𥹺 is also the variant of 麋. ⿰禾麋 is included in ZHSJ PUA as F0290.
Add new UCV for ⿳亠⿰？？大 and ⿻夫⿰？？.
unify to 𭊞 (U+2D29E)?
U+2D136 𭄶 is the variant of U+52D9 務.
Unify to 嚦 (U+56A6) per UCV #294.
unify to 𲊋 (U+3228B)
add the new UCV for U+9054 達 and U+9039 逹
U+58B6 墶 🆚 U+2143F 𡐿
U+297D0 𩟐 🆚 U+297B1 𩞱
Unify to 𤡎 (U+2484E)
The pronunciations are the same and the glyphs are very similar. We can confirm they are cognate.
⿰⿱山王攵, ⿰⿱山壬攵, ⿰⿱山𡈼攵, ⿰⿱山主攵, ⿰⿳山一王攵, ⿰⿳山一壬攵, ⿰⿳山一𡈼攵, ⿰⿱山王攴, ⿰⿱山壬攴, ⿰⿱山𡈼攴, ⿰⿱山主攴, ⿰⿳山一王攴, ⿰⿳山一壬攴, ⿰⿳山一𡈼攴
TB-7C36 is the variant of 淵.
The submitted evidence of TC-407E shows it is the variant of 杆, and the new evidence on Comment #10778 means the English word “corn”.
粁 (U+7C81) means kilometre.
They are non-cognates.
unify to 𬟤 (U+2C7E4)?
TCA should confirm the meaning of 𬟤 (U+2C7E4).
Unify to WS2021-02524:TE-2753 via UCV #252
As Andrew’s comment under WS2021-02524 (#14133), these two should be unified and the discussion record showed “China may propose horizontal extension noted, IRG 62”.
Add this one and U+31ECC 𱻌 to UCV as Lv. 2?
Noted by Eiso:
This one is the variant of 義 (zh:yì; yue:ji6; vi:nghĩa), and U+31ECC 𱻌 is the variant of 羕 (zh:yàng; yue:joeng6; vi:dàng, dạng), that means they are non-cognates, but they could be interchanged to use as the components.
It is very dangerous to add ⿰矢X/⿰夫X.
WS2017-02267 shows the same meaning in its Evidence 1, but U+31AA3 𱪣 is also used as Bouyei character, but ⿰火巳 is not.
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 284
The right part of U+31AA3 𱪣 is the phonetic element, which comes from the right part of U+72AF 犯 (< U+22398 𢎘).
The 攝 of 犯 is 咸 in Middle Chinese.
JMJ-032252 has been unified to 𠲙 (U+20C99) since Unicode, 16.0.0, and the JMJ-032252 glyph is the same as current GHZ-10623.10 glyph to match Kangxi Dictionary (同文書局本).
However, 康熙五十五年武英殿本 shows the same glyph as VN-F007E (different from the glyph mentioned in Comment #5705).
Kangxi Dictionary shows this character is cited from 《搜真玉鏡》. Maybe we need to check 《搜真玉鏡》 if possible. And, Japan NB should consider how to handle this one.
Unify to 𠣛 (U+208DB)?
They share the same meaning and reading, but we don’t have the UCV pair for 句 and 勾.
If yes, I can add this pair to FS and SC guidelines.
#134+1 Add 戛/戞, FS=1, SC=11
Unify to 𣠓 (U+23813)?
See Comments #7099 and #7187.
We would like to hear the opinions of other IRG experts.
Unify to 耡 (U+8021)?
Based on Lee’s Comment #10774, VN-F048E is really the variant of U+8021 耡 without V-Source reference now (maybe VN-08021 in future). The right parts, 𦔳 and 助 are also the variant pair. U+26533 𦔳 was submitted by TCA and Vietnam did the horizontal extension later. This one is also included in GCA list as one GCA-F one with the same meaning as TCA.
May be we can add 助~𦔳 as one UCV pair as lv. 2.
MJ shows the Japanese kunyomi reading of 𬼀 JMJ-056854 is して, similar to the variant of 為.
Fig. 3.1.3, Fig. 3.1.4 of L2/25-151 show it is also one special kana.
VN-F1F1F means the variant of 饒, means a little, abundant and so on.
They are non-cognates, and Vietnam did the normalization.
It is also necessary to consider the relationship between ⿺專丶 and 尃.
Attributes
Showing 297 comments.
IRG N2862R #6Hc
The evidence shows it is the variant of 荡/蕩, and the top component of 昜 is 日 not 曰, so 汨 is more suitable.
Based on three pieces of evidence (2 submitted and 1 new), the glyph should be ⿵门⿱𰁜大 not ⿵门奕. Evidence 1 shows the Putonghua reading is luán, that means the top of the inside part is 𰁜, the variant of 䜌 not 亦.
In PRC conventions, 𰁜 and 亦 are not the same. So, the theoretical traditional form should be ⿵門⿱䜌大 not ⿵門奕.
We can find 峦塘 and 栾塘 in 永福县.
For the structure ⿱⿰未成X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) the radical of X, 2) 戈.
Rad = the radical of X
U+81A5 膥
U+326EE
WS2024-02350 ⿱⿰未成牛
Rad = 戈
U+203B6 𠎶
This Zhuang word “guk” means “tiger”.
▲ 《壮汉英词典》, p. 533
《古壮字字典》 shows ⿺虎骨.
[WS2021-03500]
Follow the radical of U+2CEA8 .
Note: the original radical of 象 is 豕.
The reading of this character is laeng, which means “back”.
▲ 《壮汉英词典》, pp. 690-680
It is easy to know the semantic element is 后.
Note 批 reads bae in 老借 (新借 bih), but the final of 批 belongs to 蟹攝 in Middle Chinese.
Therefore, the Radical #28.0 is right, but it is not intuitive. It is OK to use 81.0 as the primary radical, 28.0 as the secondary radical.
The RS value of 次 is 76.2, but 欠 is in the middle. For 次, the original form the left part is 二. See T1-4839 and K0-732D. It is better to add one new rule for 次 (1 or 4) in SC and FS guidelines.
The suggested solution is below.
1) Change Radical to 107.0 (皮) from 15.0 (冫), SC=6, FS=4 or 1
2) Add 76.0 (欠) as the secondary radical, SC=7, FS=4 or 1
For the structure ⿲王X王, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) the radical of X, 2) 玉
Rad=the rad of X
U+6591 斑 (S=文, P=班省)
U+28325 𨌥 (S=車 and 珏/𤤴/玨/朋)
Rad=玉
U+73ED 班
U+2493B 𤤻 (var. of 班)
U+249A6 𤦦 (var. of 班)
U+2AEEE 𪻮
U+2DE5A 𭹚 (var. of 班)
U+2DE5E 𭹞 (var. of 斑)
U+30880 𰢀 (var. of 班)
U+30881 𰢁 (var. of 班)
The left component is 本 not 木, that means 木 and 又 are not both intuitive. Maybe Radical 75.0 could be the secondary one.
Based on the evidence, Component ⺄ is the variant of Component 雨 (⻗), and 支 is the phonetic element (老借 ci, cei, 新借 cih).
cf.
U+2B86E 𫡮
U+31380 𱎀
U+31388 𱎈
Keep both radicals.
So, the semantic element is 上, and the phonetic element is 艮 (新借 should be gwn vs gèn, 老借 I guessed is gaenj).
Keep both.
kMandarin for 艮 is gěn now, but I think gèn will be better.
The semantic element is 氵(<水), the phonetic element is 𫯓 (S=多, P=來).
If the submitter hopes to keep the current IDS, it is also OK.
Rad=石
WS2024-02723 ⿰磨木 (L:S, R:P)
WS2024-02724 ⿰磨古 (L:S, R:P)
WS2024-02727 ⿰磨告 (L:S, R:P)
Rad=麻
WS2024-02724 ⿰磨古 (L:S, R:P)
Rad=rad of X
WS2024-02723 ⿰磨木 (L:S, R:P)
U+287D6 𨟖 (L:P, R:S)
U+31426 𱐦 (L:P, R:S)
U+32389 𲎉 (L:P, R:S)
For U+307DD 𰟝, the phonetic element is 勒 (reads as laeg in 老借), and the semantic element is 灭(<滅).
For this character, the component 光 is related to 灭, but how about 而? The 音韻地位 for 而 is 日母止攝開口三等之韻平聲. I have not collected the 老借 form of 而 (the 新借 form is wz), but we can get the probable form is ngaez (耳 reads ngaex). That means it is hard to say 而 is the direct phonetic element, and 光 must not be the phonetic element as well.
In 《古壮字字典》 (p. 421), 而 is also used to record the Zhuang word rieg (“to take off one set or piece of clothing and put on a fresh one”). The Zhuang word rieg is close to raeg.
All in all, it is better to keep this radical and add 126.0 (而) as the secondary one.
BTW, the top component is the variant of 四.
Follow the radical of 予 (6.3).
Also see WS2024-00085:TC-2E46
If Comment #7672 been accepted, IDS should be updated as well.
不 in the submitted IDS is U+F967
See the radical
See Comment #12908.
The radical of 釁 is 酉.
It is the variant of 𢼶 and 𣁊.
This rule has been added to IRG N2862.
See Comment #12601 under WS2024-02316.
For the structure ⿸𤕫X, there are three situations for the radicals: 1) 爿, 2) 疒, 3) the radical of component X.
Rad=爿
U+2457A 𤕺
U+32B48
Rad=疒
U+308F1 𰣱
U+30901 𰤁
U+30905 𰤅
U+3090A 𰤊
Rad=the rad of X
U+26896 𦢖
U+27B6D 𧭭
U+28FF3 𨿳
U+2A1FF 𪇿
U+2E34E 𮍎
See Comment #12601 under WS2024-02316.
See Comment #12601 under WS2024-02316.
See Comment #12601 under WS2024-02316.
It is also normalized the glyph to match IDS and Evidence 2 not 3.
IDS is also needed to updated.
It is not easy to confirm the semantic rationale, so two radicals will be better.
or normalize the glyph to match current IDS.
Count the value for ⿱雨勳.
The reading is also the same as 斗.
For the structure ⿺尾X, we have three situations for the radicals: 1) 尸, 2) 毛, 3) the radical of X.
Rad.=尸
U+5C57 屗
U+21C6D 𡱭
U+21C88 𡲈
U+21C89 𡲉
U+21C8A 𡲊
U+21C8B 𡲋
U+21CA4 𡲤
U+21CA5 𡲥
U+21CA7 𡲧
U+21CA8 𡲨
U+21CAA 𡲪
U+21CAB 𡲫
U+21CB8 𡲸
U+21CBC 𡲼
U+21CC0 𡳀
U+21CC3 𡳃
U+21CCA 𡳊
U+21CD3 𡳓
U+21CD4 𡳔
U+21CD5 𡳕
U+21CD6 𡳖
U+21CD7 𡳗
U+21CDD 𡳝
U+21CE6 𡳦
U+21CEA 𡳪
U+21CF1 𡳱
U+21CF2 𡳲
U+21CF3 𡳳
U+2AA15 𪨕
U+2AA19 𪨙
U+2AA1D 𪨝
U+2AA1F 𪨟
U+2BD5E 𫵞
U+2BD63 𫵣
U+2D567 𭕧
U+2D568 𭕨
U+3037A 𰍺
U+30384 𰎄
U+30385 𰎅
U+316C1 𱛁
U+316C2 𱛂
Rad.=毛
U+2DBE2 𭯢
Rad.=the rad. of X
U+20868 𠡨
U+209EE 𠧮
U+219A5 𡦥
U+22F59 𢽙
U+23341 𣍁
U+25591 𥖑
U+25700 𥜀
U+28914 𨤔
U+2A450 𪑐
U+2BBE8 𫯨
U+2BC35 𫰵
U+2CA0A 𬨊
U+319C7 𱧇
U+32A0E
U+33339
Rad.=尸 & the rad. of X
U+5C58 屘
U+3273A
For the structure ⿱𦥯X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) the radical of X, 2) 臼
Rad=rad of X
U+56B3 嚳
U+58C6 壆
U+5B78 學
U+5DA8 嶨
U+6FA9 澩
U+71E2 燢
U+7910 礐
U+89BA 覺
U+89F7 觷
U+96E4 雤
U+9C5F 鱟
U+9DFD 鷽
U+9ECC 黌
U+3F47 㽇
U+4077 䁷
U+4441 䑁
U+4BB8 䮸
U+20539 𠔹
U+20FDF 𠿟
U+216A3 𡚣
U+23C53 𣱓
U+246F1 𤛱
U+25023 𥀣
U+2574A 𥝊
U+263D7 𦏗
U+2C2E1 𬋡
U+2C830 𬠰
U+2E0AE 𮂮
U+325E2
U+326C9
U+328FC
U+32C06
Rad=臼
U+244DF 𤓟
U+2698E 𦦎
U+26991 𦦑
U+26997 𦦗
U+2699B 𦦛
U+269A0 𦦠
U+269AF 𦦯
U+269B5 𦦵
U+269C0 𦧀
U+2C6FD 𬛽
U+2E373 𮍳
The reading is sī and the phonetic element is 思.
The current RS could also be kept.
Looks the variant of 魁, and the radical of 魁 is the outside component 鬼.
For the structure ⿺免X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) 儿, 2) the radical of X.
Rad.=儿
U+204BE 𠒾
U+204C4 𠓄
U+204CD 𠓍
U+2A782 𪞂
Rad.=the rad of X
U+52C9 勉
U+2188E 𡢎
U+231B6 𣆶
U+251C5 𥇅
U+2831C 𨌜
U+28F7A 𨽺
U+2BC32 𫰲
U+2CDD6 𬷖
U+2ECEA 𮳪
IRG N1105 shows below.
Maybe we need to follow the later one?
For the structure ⿱玨X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) 玉, 2) the radical of component X
Rad=玉
U+73E1 珡 (variant of 琴)
U+7434 琴 (musical instrument)
U+7435 琵 (musical instrument)
U+7436 琶 (musical instrument)
U+7439 琹 (variant of 琴)
U+745F 瑟 (musical instrument)
U+24996 𤦖
U+24997 𤦗
U+249C2 𤧂 (variant of 琴)
U+249C6 𤧆 (variant of 琴)
U+24A0D 𤨍
U+24A58 𤩘
U+24A5F 𤩟 (variant of 琴)
U+2AEF4 𪻴 (variant of 琴 and 珍)
U+2B73B (musical instrument)
U+2DE65 𭹥 (musical instrument + variant of 筑)
U+2DE78 𭹸 (musical instrument + variant of 箜)
U+2DE92 𭺒
U+2DE95 𭺕
U+30877 𰡷 (variant of 琴)
U+30886 𰢆 (variant of 琴)
U+30887 𰢇 (variant of 琴)
U+3088C 𰢌 (variant of 琴)
U+31BD0 𱯐 (variant of 柬)
U+32BDE (variant of 拜)
Rad=the rad of X
U+22708 𢜈 (variant of 琴 and 慧)
U+235DC 𣗜 (variant of 琴)
U+28A16 𨨖 (variant of 琴)
U+2ABE5 𪯥 (variant of 斑 and 瑟)
U+2D310 𭌐
U+2D481 𭒁 (variant of 瑟)
U+2D8D1 𭣑
U+327D7 (variant of 弄)
Rad=玉=the rad of X
U+32BEC
Based on Comment #778, it is the variant of U+81BA 膺 and the pronunciation provided by TCA is also yīng. That means the bottom component is 肉.
However, the T glyph shows 月 based on TCA conventions. Note: GCCS glyph didn’t distinguish these two relevant radicals on the glyphs.
The radical confirmation rule of ⿸雁？ is inconsistent.
Radical #27.0 (厂):
U+2EC12 𮰒
Radical #172.0 (隹):
U+3104D 𱁍
Radicals for the bottom:
U+8D0B 贋, U+8D5D 赝, U+3DF3 㷳, U+2439D 𤎝, U+2E63B 𮘻
IRGN945AR
gào for Rad. 日 (<昔)
xí for Rad. 口 (<告)
Add the secondary radical as 9.0 (人), SC=21, FS=5
For the structure ⿱䜌X, there are three situations for the radicals: 1) the radical of X, 2) 言, 3) 糸
Rad=rad of X
U+535B 卛
U+5971 奱
U+5B4C 孌
U+5B7F 孿
U+5DD2 巒
U+5F4E 彎
U+6200 戀
U+6523 攣
U+66EB 曫
U+6B12 欒
U+7053 灓
U+77D5 矕
U+81E0 臠
U+883B 蠻
U+947E 鑾
U+9E1E 鸞
U+3618 㘘
U+3748 㝈
U+3869 㡩
U+3ABB 㪻
U+3F4B 㽋
U+20673 𠙳
U+2082A 𠠪
U+20A2B 𠨫
U+20B93 𠮓
U+20B96 𠮖
U+22376 𢍶
U+23035 𣀵
U+239B1 𣦱
U+244D6 𤓖
U+24ADC 𤫜
U+2503A 𥀺
U+268CF 𦣏
U+269BD 𦦽
U+26AF2 𦫲
U+277CF 𧟏
U+2829F 𨊟
U+283F6 𨏶
U+293F9 𩏹
U+2965F 𩙟
U+29ABE 𩪾
U+2A23D 𪈽
U+2AB57 𪭗
U+2D4DD 𭓝
U+2DBEE 𭯮
U+2E382 𮎂
U+2E72D 𮜭
Rad=言
U+8B8A 變
U+27B8C 𧮌
Rad=糸
U+261E5 𦇥
U+261F7 𦇷
U+30AF9 𰫹
The radicals of U+9FBB 龻 and U+470C 䜌 are both 言, so the radicals 糸 are not better.
Note that the top component is the phonetic element in this character.
See similar question in WS2024-04416.
Add 飠/𩙿/食, FS=3, SC=9
There are two situations of the structure ⿱殸X for the radical: 1) the radical of X, 2) 殳.
Rad = the rad of X
U+6480 撀
U+6F00 漀
U+78EC 磬
U+7F44 罄
U+8072 聲
U+8B26 謦
U+93E7 鏧
U+97FE 韾
U+99A8 馨
U+3BCF 㯏
U+3DEB 㷫
U+3FE6 㿦
U+417D 䅽
U+4870 䡰
U+21108 𡄈
U+21112 𡄒
U+22419 𢐙
U+23346 𣍆
U+24BD2 𤯒
U+250DF 𥃟
U+252A7 𥊧
U+255DA 𥗚
U+25F06 𥼆
U+27421 𧐡
U+27934 𧤴
U+27E77 𧹷
U+288A4 𨢤
U+293DC 𩏜
U+2A371 𪍱
U+2A415 𪐕
U+2A530 𪔰
U+2A6A3 𪚣
U+2A879 𪡹
U+2B324 𫌤
U+2BDB2 𫶲
U+2C18D 𬆍
U+2CE9D 𬺝
U+2DFE9 𭿩
U+2E090 𮂐
U+2E851 𮡑
U+2E85E 𮡞
U+2EB51 𮭑
U+30498 𰒘
U+30943 𰥃
U+30A69 𰩩
U+30D9F 𰶟
U+30DCE 𰷎
U+30E98 𰺘
U+3155E 𱕞
U+31C0E 𱰎
U+32E4F
Rad = 殳
U+6BCA 毊
U+3C86 㲆
U+3C87 㲇
U+3C88 㲈
U+23AA4 𣪤
U+23AC6 𣫆
U+23ACA 𣫊
U+23AD2 𣫒
U+23AD8 𣫘
U+23AD9 𣫙
U+23ADC 𣫜
U+23ADD 𣫝
U+23AE3 𣫣
U+23AE4 𣫤
U+23AE8 𣫨
U+246D7 𤛗
U+2AD51 𪵑
U+2DBBE 𭮾
U+2DBC3 𭯃
U+2DBC5 𭯅
Three pieces of evidence shows the left part is the semantic element. The radical of 采 is 165.
It is OK to keep both of them as the radicals.
It is OK to add Radical 105.0 (癶) as the secondary one.
It is OK to add 衣 as the secondary radical.
We don't know the real meaning of this character, and this one is not related to the five elements/五行 (金木水火土).
吿 V1-4E5F
No need to update the glyph.
We can add Radical 42.0 (小) to U+5149 光 as the secondary one.
This character reads as oăm (another form is U+2334D 𣍍), that means the phonetic element is 宛 uyển, and the semantic element is 曲.
⿰&Z5-01;免
See Comment #12820 under WS2024-03056.
“côi cút” means “lonely, solitary”, that means the semantic element is 孤 (RS=39.5), the phonetic element is 骨 (cốt, A1).
So, keep both.
IRG N954AR shows below.
Semantic element is 快, and phonetic element is 毛.
Note: S=電, P=察
Keep the current one, and add 107.0 (皮) as the secondary one.
The radical of U+206A2 𠚢 is R17.0, and the semantic element is 出, the phonetic element is 罒<羅.
In Từ Điển Chữ Nôm Tày, there are
⿰𫧇重, U+2BB7F 𫭿, U+80FD 能
It is easy to know, component 𫧇 is the variant of 能. So, the phonetic element is 𫧇 (<能).
The current radical has matched the semantic rationale.
For the structure ⿺元X, there are two situations for the radical: 1) 儿, 2) the radical of the X.
Rad=儿
U+5158 兘
U+34AC 㒬
U+34AE 㒮
U+20489 𠒉
U+20493 𠒓
U+2049C 𠒜
U+204A2 𠒢
U+204BA 𠒺
U+204BB 𠒻
U+2B91E 𫤞
U+2D01E 𭀞
U+2D029 𭀩
U+2D02A 𭀪
U+2D02B 𭀫
U+300CF 𰃏
Rad=the rad of X
U+3774 㝴
U+2083A 𠠺
U+22487 𢒇
U+291D6 𩇖
U+29418 𩐘
U+2B163 𫅣
U+2E4F8 𮓸
U+30064 𰁤
U+30420 𰐠
Radical #12.0 (八):
U+2D04C 𭁌, U+2D051 𭁑, U+2D059 𭁙
Radical #24.0 (十):
U+209AF 𠦯, U+209BB 𠦻, U+2A7F6 𪟶, U+2A7F8 𪟸, U+2B9DF 𫧟, U+2D162 𭅢, U+3017C 𰅼, U+3017F 𰅿; U+209BA
IRG N2862R #7Dd shows the value should be 7.
Evidence
Showing 186 comments.
▲ 《台北漢唐樂府 韓國·香港訪問團》, 韓國漢城大學·延世大學·漢陽大學·大田萬國博覽會·香港第一屆中國音樂節（香港文化中心音樂廳）, 1993.10.17-10.30
▲ 林珀姬: 《南管曲唱研究》 (《臺灣近百年研究叢刊》), 臺北: 文史哲出版社, 2004.11, ISBN 957-549-480-6, p. 320
▲ 林吳素霞: 《南管音樂賞析〈一〉入門篇》, 彰化市: 彰化縣文化局, 2005.2, ISBN 957-02-4045-8, p. 60
▲ 《台北漢唐樂府 韓國·香港訪問團》, 韓國漢城大學·延世大學·漢陽大學·大田萬國博覽會·香港第一屆中國音樂節（香港文化中心音樂廳）, 1993.10.17-10.30
▲ 林吳素霞: 《南管音樂賞析〈一〉入門篇》, 彰化市: 彰化縣文化局, 2005.2, ISBN 957-02-4045-8, p. 60
▲ 唐滌生: 《紫釵記 修訂版》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 6
▲ 葉紹德: 《白蛇傳 大斷橋》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 5
▲ 新劍郎: 《十八羅漢伏金鵬之驚變》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 12
▲ 林川: 《啼笑姻緣之劫後餘情》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 龐秋華: 《長生殿》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 龐秋華: 《長生殿》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 5
▲ 陳錦榮: 《洛水情》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 3
▲ 李願聞: 《逍遙樂》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 李願聞: 《逍遙樂》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 2
▲ 溫誌鵬: 《訪陸游》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 143
▲ 龐秋華: 《梅花仙 (上卷)》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 龐秋華: 《梅花仙 (下卷)》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 《毛泽东读书集成(第220卷) 》(北京: 中央文献出版社, 2013) [ISBN 978-7-5073-3945-1] p. 157871
王基笑: 《豫剧唱腔音乐概论》 (《戏曲音乐研究丛书》), 北京: 人民音乐出版社, 1993.7, ISBN 7-103-01055-2/J·1056, p. 343
▲ 陈修: 《〈客方言〉点校》 (《客家研究大讲坛丛书》), 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2009.6, ISBN 978-7-5623-2874-2, p. 151
▲ 鞍山市农业农村局: 《台安县凤娟家庭农场入选第三批全国家庭农场典型案例》
And we can also find the names as 锅撑子, 锅蛏子 and so on.
▲ IIT in China
▲ ～万禧: 《巷道围岩三维应力的边界元分析》//中国岩石力学与工程学会岩石力学数值计算及模型试验专业委员会: 《第一届全国岩石力学数值计算及模型试验讨论会论文集》, 峨眉：西南交通大学出版社, 1988.12, ISBN 7-81022-091-8/Z·006, p. 59
▲ 吴仲强: 《中国当代自然科学人物总传 第三卷》, 长沙: 湖南出版社, 1992.10, ISBN 7-5438-0377-1/N·5, p. 593
▲ 沈加东, 陈希～, 潘乃光, 诸葛振荣, 颜钢锋, 孙志峰: 《提花织物纹制CAD/CAM系统》, 《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》, 第5卷第3期, 1993.7, p. 231
▲ 王耘, 陈希～, 应道宁: 《有遮挡二维物体的识别研究》, 《工程图学学报》, 1990年第2期, 1990.3, p. 69
▲ 王畹, 吴廷華: 《宣化府志》, 乾隆刻本, 卷之九, folio 13A
宣化 is a common geographic name in the history of China. This piece of evidence means current 河北省张家口市宣化区 and 阳原县, other places means current 甘肃省张掖市 (aka 甘州), 广西壮族自治区南宁市市区 and 邕宁区 and so on.
The place mentioned in the evidence are written as 籍箕疃 now.
▲ 中国国家地名信息库
▲ 池涌: 《故事阳原》, 石家庄: 河北美术出版社, 2018.8, ISBN 978-7-5310-9283-4, p. 60
▲ 马本立: 《湘西文化大辞典》, 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2000.7, ISBN 7-80520-903-0/G·137, p. 538
This picture is cited from WS2021-01433:UK-20515 (Comment #15418).
[WS2021-01433]
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 2
The Zhuang reading of U+316B9 𱚹 is sux*. For the standard reading, the tone mark -x/-ч corresponds to 阳上 (John said this reading is used in Longzhou Zhuang), but the tone of 昼 should be 阴去 (-q/-ƽ). On the other hand, the middle Chinese finals (韵母) of 手 and 昼 are the same, and one 老借 reading of 手 I collected is suj; that 知母 reads as [s-]/[θ-] is very common. For common 腔词结合 rule in Cantonese Yueju Opera, Cantonese Yuequ Show and Cantonese pop songs, 阳上 (Tone 5) and 阴去 (Tone 3) could mean to the same musical scale, such as 上 (Gongche) for 平喉.
The semantic rationale of U+316B9 𱚹 in Zhuang and Tày is still NOT obvious. If it is the way like 臼 and 旧, 幺 and 么 to distinguish the meanings, the submitted glyph is acceptable; if we can not confirm this, it is better to change the glyph to match the evidence.
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 21-55
▲ В. М. Алексеев; 阎国栋, 马静: 《中国民间年画及其研究前景》//冯骥才; 向云驹: 《年画研究·2024 冬》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2025.1, ISBN 978-7-5039-7787-9, p. 4
▲ 顧一樵 (顧毓琇), 梁實秋, 應尚能: 《荆軻插曲》, 重慶: 詠葵樂譜刊印社, 1940.1, flyleaf
▲ 董説: 《七國攷》, 文淵閣四庫全書, juan 3, folio 36A
▲ 朱勝非: 《紺珠集》, 文淵閣四庫全書, juan 5, folio 5A
▲ 《東方雜誌》, 1932.1.25, V. 28, No. 2
▲ 陈修: 《〈客方言〉点校》 (《客家研究大讲坛丛书》), 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2009.6, ISBN 978-7-5623-2874-2, p. 191
▲ 《墨子》, 四庫全書本, 卷六, folio 12A
▲ 《墨子》, 四部叢刊本, 卷六, folio 4B
▲ 《御定子史精華》, 文淵閣四庫全書本, juan 79, folio 1A
▲ 《墨子》, 正統道藏本, 卷之六
▲ 《廣雅疏證》, 畿輔叢書, 卷七下
▲ 《廣雅疏證》, 清嘉慶刻本, 卷第七下, folio 51B
The evidence shows the person was 承文著作單 / 승문저작단 in 1786. And Comment #10841 shows 金驥燦 / 김기찬 was 承文副正字單 / 승문부정자단, 承文博士單 / 승문박사단 and so on in the same year.
The new evidence has been accepted, ROK could keep this character as-is.
The glyph on the evidence looked like U+6A3A 樺 K0-7B7C.
There is only one case related to KC-10030 in 국사편찬위원회.
But, there are 8 cases related to 白樺皮.
[Note from Eiso]
I can’t find more evidence for this character. Maybe ROK needs to find more to prove it isn’t the a one-off case?
清乾隆四十九年/朝鲜正祖八年/日本天明四年/后黎景興四十五年/阮泰德七年/甲辰龍年冬月初二 means 1784-12-13.
▲ 승정원일기 216책 (탈초본 11책) 현종 10년 8월 17일 정축 3/19 기사 1669년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 8년 朴世柱 등이 하직함
According to WS2024-03276:KC-10095, the geographic name is also 坡. It looks this one is the error form of U+323EC .
[WS2021-00064]
If there is no more evidence, this is the one-off error form, that is not better to encode.
We need to understand what this character mean, and then to confirm if it is suitable to unify it with U+27E15 𧸕.
The evidence shows the person was 南學敎授 / 남학교수 in 1670, and I found 李英馧 was 南學敎授 / 남학교수 in 1980.
▲ 승정원일기 277책 (탈초본 14책) 숙종 6년 7월 13일 경자 4/21 기사 1680년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 19년 崔逸 등이 사은함
[WS2021-00064]
The evidence shows the official position of 李顯三 / 이현삼 is 舊～波知權管 / 구～파지권관 in 1783, and ～波 is one geographical name.
The other page shows 舊乫坡知權管 / 구갈파지권관 as the official position of 李顯三 / 이현삼 in 1782.
▲ 승정원일기 1523책 (탈초본 82책) 정조 6년 12월 29일 신묘 14/37 기사 1782년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 47년 兵批의 관원현황
The geographical name is written as 乫坡, 乫波, 坡, 波, 加乙坡, 茄乙坡, 茄乙波.
Note: U+323EC could be KC00032 and KC09925.
The other evidence shows the related information in the same year.
▲ 승정원일기 1115책 (탈초본 62책) 영조 31년 1월 13일 정해 22/22 기사 1755년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 20년
▲ 승정원일기 1117책 (탈초본 62책) 영조 31년 3월 19일 임진 5/13 기사 1755년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 20년 逆賊李濂 등을 各配所로 押送하겠다는 義禁府의 草記
▲ 승정원일기 1117책 (탈초본 62책) 영조 31년 3월 21일 갑오 7/10 기사 1755년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 20년
The name of the person is written as U+308CB 𰣋.
U+308CB 𰣋 is the variant of U+7A61 穡 or U+55C7 嗇. Both of them read 색.
▲ 승정원일기 1638책 (탈초본 87책) 정조 12년 1월 11일 갑술 8/17 기사 1788년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 53년 吏批의 관원현황
When we search 金命嶷, we can find the following results.
So, this character should not be identified as ⿱山款.
I suggest ROK confirm this issue.
▲ 승정원일기 1684책 (탈초본 89책) 정조 14년 12월 21일 정묘 15/15 기사 1790년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 55년
所斤浦/소근포 is one geographic name.
The evidence shows the person 申～ was 副司直 / 부사직 in 1791 (7/20).
申馥 / 신복 was 副司直 in 1790.
▲ 승정원일기 1684책 (탈초본 89책) 정조 14년 12월 7일 계축 14/19 기사 1790년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 55년 兵批의 관원현황
申馥 / 신복 was 副司直 in 1791.
▲ 승정원일기 1694책 (탈초본 89책) 정조 15년 9월 9일 신사 29/39 기사 1791년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 56년 兵批의 관원현황
At the end of 1791, he was upgraded as 司成 / 사성.
▲ 승정원일기 1697책 (탈초본 90책) 정조 15년 12월 17일 정사 48/51 기사 1791년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 56년
▲ 승정원일기 1696책 (탈초본 90책) 정조 15년 11월 6일 정축 11/12 기사 1791년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 56년
But, other page shows different name (權裻/권독).
權覸/권간·權⿰冝見(𮗗)/권의·權裳/권상·權裻/권독·權襞/권벽·權⿱其衣/권기·權襄/권양
The following one is cited from Evidence 1 of WS2024-03464.
▲ 승정원일기 1704책 (탈초본 90책) 정조 16년 윤 4월 27일 을미 20/22 기사 1792년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 57년
Compared these two materials, two personal names are different, one pair is 權～/권～ vs 權裻/권독, the other pair is 權衮/권곤 vs 權襄/권양. When we search 權～ or 權裻, there are both only one piece of result. But, we can get three pieces of results of 權襄, and only one for 權衮. Maybe 權襄 is the proper form.
We also need to confirm if the submitted character is the variant of U+88FB 裻.
▲ 승정원일기 1704책 (탈초본 90책) 정조 16년 윤 4월 27일 을미 20/22 기사 1792년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 57년
See here.
The submitted evidence shows:
禹衡進·趙天民·李KC10128·金道轍·金應德·金應沇
The other evidence shows:
禹衡鎭·趙天民·李暎·全道轍·金應德·金應沇
All of them are from 慶尙道/경상도.
For the reading, 進=鎭=진. One shows 金道轍/김도철, the other shows 全道轍/전도철, but we can confirm they means the same person.
▲ 승정원일기 1705책 (탈초본 90책) 정조 16년 5월 7일 갑진 15/16 기사 1792년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 57년
The above picture is cited from the evidence of WS2024-04230.
▲ 승정원일기 1705책 (탈초본 90책) 정조 16년 5월 7일 갑진 15/16 기사 1792년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 57년
▲ 승정원일기 1705책 (탈초본 90책) 정조 16년 5월 7일 갑진 15/16 기사 1792년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 57년
▲ 승정원일기 1705책 (탈초본 90책) 정조 16년 5월 7일 갑진 15/16 기사 1792년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 57년
The person mentioned in the evidence is related to a government post: 金海府使 (김해부사). In the Wikipedia entry of 李光軾/이광식, he also once held this government post, and the link of 김해 is related to current 김해시 (金海市) under 경상남도 (慶尙南道).
부사 (府使) Wikipedia entry
부사(府事)는 주로 조선 시대에 지역 및 지방 행정구역의 수장으로 무관(武官)들이 임명되는 관직이었다.부사는 수령과 달리 군사적 요충지에 해당하는 행정구역을 주로 담당하였다.
When we search “金海府使”, we can get 620 entries in 承政院日記/승정원일기, and there are three entries related to the man named 柳鎭琡 (유진숙).
1793년
1794년
1794년
Note: the evidence is related to 1793.
So, this is the one-off error form of U+7421 琡.
ROK should confirm which one is right.
▲ 승정원일기 1718책 (탈초본 91책) 정조 17년 6월 26일 정해 21/23 기사 1793년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 58년
▲ 승정원일기 1737책 (탈초본 92책) 정조 18년 10월 25일 기묘 14/19 기사 1794년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 59년
▲ 승정원일기 1807책 (탈초본 95책) 정조 23년 4월 13일 신축 16/19 기사 1799년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 4년
▲ 승정원일기 1748책 (탈초본 92책) 정조 19년 7월 1일 병술[경술] 32/36 기사 1795년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 60년
▲ 승정원일기 1749책 (탈초본 92책) 정조 19년 8월 8일 병술 26/29 기사 1795년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 60년
▲ 승정원일기 1744책 (탈초본 92책) 정조 19년 5월 1일 신해 22/26 기사 1795년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 60년
▲ 승정원일기 1746책 (탈초본 92책) 정조 19년 6월 18일 정유 23/24 기사 1795년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 60년
Other materials show the name as 任藗, such as the following.
▲ 승정원일기 1800책 (탈초본 95책) 정조 22년 11월 2일 신유 5/32 기사 1798년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 3년
And other different form (⿱艹⿺辶⿰𠦝攵), but I think this different form is one-off error.
▲ 승정원일기 1683책 (탈초본 89책) 정조 14년 11월 8일 을유[갑신] 48/51 기사 1790년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 55년
The submitted form (⿱艹遫) looks the most proper one at that time. The following one also match the submitted from.
▲ 증경찬의고(曾經贊儀考)
▲ 승정원일기 231책 (탈초본 12책) 현종 13년 11월 21일 임진 11/21 기사 1672년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 11년 身病 및 노모의 병환을 간호하기 위해 사직을 청하는 姜栢年의 상소
Also see Entry B04945-003 in Dictionary of Chinese Character Variants.
We can find several similar words in the database below.
乖盭 괴려
蹠盭 척려
舛盭 천려
謬盭 유려
違盭 위려
And, 灸 reads 구, 炙 reads 적. It is easy to know the materials mean 蹠盭 척려 as the same as B04945-003 shows.
If we treat Evidence 2 does not match the submitted glyph, and I have provided one more piece evidence, so maybe we can accept it as the stable error. We need to listen to more experts’ comments.
Note: There is no any referenceable example among the encoded characters.
▲ 승정원일기 1841책 (탈초본 97책) 순조 1년 9월 3일 정축 33/35 기사 1801년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 6년
In the previous picture, the glyph shows ⿰⿱⿻王冖业⿱丷丁, which must be the variant of 虧, and it had been identified as 虧 in the modern digital text.
We need more evidence to prove it is not the one-off piece.
The evidence shows the person is related to 崔慶麟/최경린.
▲ 승정원일기 1867책 (탈초본 99책) 순조 3년 5월 6일 기해 22/29 기사 1803년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 8년 兵批의 관원현황
The new evidence has supported to encode, so we could keep it as-is.
羲 and 𦏁 is UCV #232g (Lv2).
▲ 승정원일기 1908책 (탈초본 101책) 순조 6년 2월 27일 을사 17/21 기사 1806년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 11년
▲ 승정원일기 1909책 (탈초본 101책) 순조 6년 3월 5일 계축 24/26 기사 1806년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 11년
After this time, 柳暕/유간 became 寧陵參奉/영릉참봉, 禁府都事/금부도사, 稷山縣監/직산현감 (under 忠清南道 now), 永平縣令/영평현령 (under 京畿道 now) and so on.
▲ 승정원일기 1938책 (탈초본 102책) 순조 7년 12월 15일 임자[임오] 36/38 기사 1807년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 12년
▲ Next page of the submitted evidence
▲ 승정원일기 1938책 (탈초본 102책) 순조 7년 12월 15일 임자[임오] 37/38 기사 1807년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 12년
The evidence looks more like ⿰氵宷.
The evidence shows ～告官家/～고관가 (1809). I also found 瞞告官家/만고관가 (1785, 1795, ...).
▲ 승정원일기 1588책 (탈초본 85책) 정조 9년 8월 8일 을유 50/60 기사 1785년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 50년 龍川에 거주하는 民鄭憲等의 擊錚을 처리토록 分付할 것을 청하는 刑曹의 草記
▲ 승정원일기 1756책 (탈초본 93책) 정조 19년 11월 28일 을미[을해] 36/36 기사 1795년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 60년
That means the best form should be ⿰目滿, because of the phonetic element, and the component 日 comes from 目.
▲ 승정원일기 1918책 (탈초본 101책) 순조 6년 10월 5일 무인 25/27 기사 1806년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 11년
邊圉/변어 is a stable word.
▲ CCAMC
This is not a personal name character.
The evidence shows the person was 禮曹正郞 / 예조정랑 in 1670. And I found 李英馧 / 이영온 just was 禮曹正郞 / 예조정랑 in 1670.
▲ 승정원일기 220책 (탈초본 11책) 현종 11년 7월 30일 갑신 5/18 기사 1670년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 9년 李英馧이 陳克一의 致祭로 橫城에 나감
▲ 승정원일기 219책 (탈초본 11책) 현종 11년 5월 19일 갑술 11/11 기사 1670년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 9년 李斗元 등에게 관직을 제수함
The 本貫 / 본관 of 李英馧 / 이영온 is 禮安 / 예안, now is under 경상북도 / 慶尙北道.
▲ 陸心源: 《唐文續拾》, 潛園總集本, 卷二, folio 1B (李畬: 《汝州司馬□暉造象記》)
We can find 27 entries related to 裵尙珩 in 承政院日記/승정원일기.
1664 都事 都摠經歷
1665 訓鍊副正 武科參考官 伊川縣監
1667 都摠經歷
1668 德川郡守 三水郡守
1675 竹山府使
1676 江界府使
1677 江界府使 護軍
1678 長興縣監
1679 曹司衛將 德源府使
1681 副護軍
1686 副護軍
▲ 승정원일기 814책 (탈초본 45책) 영조 11년 12월 11일 병자 19/20 기사 1735년 雍正(淸/世宗) 13년 曺世溥 등에게 관직을 함
▲ 승정원일기 162책 (탈초본 8책) 현종 1년 6월 21일 갑진 21/28 기사 1660년 順治(淸/世祖) 17년 金南重 등에게 관직을 제수함
▲ 승정원일기 197책 (탈초본 10책) 현종 7년 10월 22일 기사 2/10 기사 1666년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 5년 林이 下直함
▲ 승정원일기 235책 (탈초본 12책) 현종 14년 7월 19일 병술 2/9 기사 1673년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 12년 丙午以上 100석 이상 拿推守令 및 100석 이상 先罷後推한 守令과 11석 이상 推考한 守令의 명단을 보고하는 義禁府의 계
▲ 승정원일기 510책 (탈초본 27책) 숙종 44년 윤 8월 21일 병인 18/26 기사 1718년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 57년 兵批의 관원 현황
▲ 《漢魏六朝碑刻異體字典》第601頁
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 萬曆戊寅本, 卷第三, folio 21B
Other and clearer edition of 《直音篇》 shows the glyph as ⿲彳魚卩. This character is the variant of 蓹, so the right part is 卩 which looks better.
TCA could consider how to handle.
▲ 승정원일기 2029책 (탈초본 106책) 순조 13년 6월 25일 경신 24/25 기사 1813년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 18년
▲ See here.
▲ See here.
▲ See here.
▲ See here.
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 96
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 29
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 36
▲ 曾良《明清小说俗字典》p826
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 96
▲ 中華民國行政院: 《禁止對邊疆同胞用足以妨害民族團結之名詞及改正西南少數民族命名表》, 1939
▲ 승정원일기 1520책 (탈초본 82책) 정조 6년 11월 2일 갑오[을미] 21/25 기사 1782년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 47년
It is the evidence of KC-04295.
▲ Evidence for WS2015-04955:KC-01075 (publishing information is unclear)
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 40
▲ The movie 《富貴臨門》, 1957, 馮志剛, 李壽祺; 任劍輝, 鄧碧雲, 梁醒波, 鄭碧影
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 86-84
▲ Thomas Chan, B. A.: “ORTHOGRAPHIC CHANGE: YUE (CANTONESE) CHINESE DIALECT CHARACTERS IN THE NINETEENTH AND TWENTIETH CENTURIES”, Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2001, p. 94
▲ 劉萬章: 《廣州兒歌甲集》, 廣州: 國立中山大學語言歷史研究所, 1928.6, p. 58
▲ 陈修: 《〈客方言〉点校》 (《客家研究大讲坛丛书》), 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2009.6, ISBN 978-7-5623-2874-2, p. 190
▲ 승정원일기 2979책 (탈초본 136책) 고종 25년 11월 7일 〈갑인〉 17/25 기사 1888년 光緖(淸/德宗) 14년
▲ 朱少璋: 《粤謳采輯》 (《嶺南文庫》), 廣州: 廣東人民, 2016.12, ISBN 978-7-218-11379-1, p. 424
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 66
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 66
▲ 승정원일기 3009책 (탈초본 137책) 고종 28년 5월 20일 〈계미〉 7/14 기사 1891년 光緖(淸/德宗) 17년
▲ 張嬉嬪의 追報와 雪冤을 청한 李三齡 등의 상소를 捧入하지 않고 大殿을 기만한 承政院 승지의 처벌, 李頤命 등의 伏刑을 청했던 李潛의 追奬, 任敞을 拿鞫하여 同黨을 캐낼 것 등을 청하는 李德標 등의 상소
▲ 승정원일기 1071책 (탈초본 59책) 영조 27년 7월 26일 경인 33/50 기사 1751년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 16년 同知中樞府事 崔昌基를 비롯한 6人의 改差를 청하는 兵批의 啓
▲ 승정원일기 1071책 (탈초본 59책) 영조 27년 7월 26일 경인 37/50 기사 1751년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 16년 李彦祥 등에게 관직을 제수함
▲ 《康熙阳春县志》
▲ 《乾隆阳春县志》
阳春县 means current 广东省阳江市阳春县. At that time (Qing Dynasty), 阳春县 was under 肇庆府.
▲ 《乾隆阳春县志》
▲ 승정원일기 257책 (탈초본 13책) 숙종 2년 12월 10일 무오 3/5 기사 1676년 康熙(淸/聖祖) 15년 洪 등이 사은함
▲ 승정원일기 952책 (탈초본 52책) 영조 18년 12월 23일 무신 12/14 기사 1742년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 7년
▲ 승정원일기 952책 (탈초본 52책) 영조 18년 12월 27일 임자 43/49 기사 1742년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 7년
▲ 승정원일기 1129책 (탈초본 62책) 영조 32년 3월 16일 갑신 26/27 기사 1756년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 21년
▲ 승정원일기 2124책 (탈초본 109책) 순조 20년 1월 18일 을해 20/20 기사 1820년 嘉慶(淸/仁宗) 25년
▲ 승정원일기 3150책 (탈초본 140책) 고종 39년 9월 13일 [양력10월14일] 경오 3/5 기사 1902년 光武 6년 光緖(淸/德宗) 28년
▲ 葉紹德: 《白蛇傳 大斷橋》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 6
▲ 蘇翁: 《打金枝》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 2
▲ 新劍郎: 《十八羅漢伏金鵬之初會》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 7
▲ 梁天雁: 《長城恨》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 5
▲ 李竹: 《桃花緣》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 11
▲ 李願聞: 《逍遙樂》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 龐秋華: 《梅花仙 (上卷)》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 龐秋華: 《梅花仙 (下卷)》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 唐滌生: 《紫釵記 修訂版》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 6
▲ 龐秋華: 《長生殿》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 龐秋華: 《長生殿》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 5
▲ 陳錦榮: 《洛水情》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 3
▲ 馬家祥: 《帶雨梨花夜半還》, 香港: 阿立粵曲天地, p. 3
Note: ⿰氵𢒼 on the new evidence has not been encoded, and I am collecting this these characters.
▲ 陸冠恩: 《玉簪記之偷詩定情》 (粵曲), 香港: 阿立粵曲天地, p. 10
▲ 陳錦榮: 《花落金谷園》 (粵曲), 香港: 阿立粵曲天地, p. 7
▲ 劉秋吟: 《一曲新詞獻知音》 (粵曲), 香港: 阿立粵曲天地, p. 3
Note: ⿰氵鿈 on the new evidence has not been encoded, and I am collecting these characters.
▲ 溫誌鵬: 《訪陸游》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 龐秋華: 《梅花仙 (下卷)》 (粵曲), 香港: 仙樂曲藝社, p. 1
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 122
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 139
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, pp. 122-123
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 139
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 123
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 123
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, pp. 123-124
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 124
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 124
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 125
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 125
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 125
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 126
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 126
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 126
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 127
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, pp. 127-128
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 122
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 128
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 128
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, pp. 128-129
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 129
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 129
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, pp. 129-130
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 130
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 131
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 132
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 132
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, pp. 132-133
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 133
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 133
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, pp. 133-134
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 134
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, pp. 134-135
▲ 塚田雅樹: 登記・供託オンライン申請システムに現れる地名を表すUnicode未符号化文字, 日本漢字學會報 第4号, p. 135
▲ 张勇风: 《莆仙戏〈张协状元〉的文本特征、断代及价值探微》//中国艺术研究院戏曲研究所《戏曲研究》编辑部: 《戏曲研究 第一百三十一辑》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2024.9, ISBN 978-7-5039-7723-7, p. 114
▲ 阮秉: 《五千字譯國語》, folio 42A
The evidence shows the glyph is U+31637 𱘷. We need more evidences.
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 39
The evidence shows the rationale is thủ chức.
If we have the UCV for 戈 and 弋 (lv. 2), it will be OK to unify them.
▲ 《上清大洞眞经》
UCV #296 shows ⿰日𣴎 should be unified here.
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 95
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 31
▲ 新加坡敎育供应社编辑委員会; 蔡淳文: 《新加坡共和国华文小学适用 华語 五下》, 新加坡: 敎育供应社有限公司 (Singapore: Educational Suppliers, Ltd.), p. 60
▲ 龔有敎 (Kung Yeu Chiao): 《中学华文（第二語文課本） 二下》, 新加坡: 新加坡世界書局（私人）有限公司 (Singapore: The World Book Co. (PTE.) Ltd.,), p. 20
Same source and same page.
▲ 徐祥 (Tu Tuong): 《新華文𡥜典》 (Sin Hua Wen Tzu Tien), 西貢 (Saigon): 華昌號 (Hoa Cheong), 1929, p. 133
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 65 comments.
See below.
The semantic element is 食/飠 (<養, bottom), and the phonetic element is 丈 (老借 form is ciengh, 新借 form is cang).
The Zhuang reading is gemq. The Zhuang reading of 剑 is giemq (老借), gen (新借). It is close to gemq.
莶 is not a very common character, and reads cim1 in Cantonese, so the closest Zhuang reading should be ciem (老借, the same as 签), which is not similar to gemq.
The Zhuang word coenggemq means Chinese chives (韭菜), and previous character is 萗 with Radical #140.0.
The most proper form should be ⿱艹剑.
The above picture of TB-6B46 shows it is the variant of 來/来.
The 新借 and 老借 readings of Zhuang are both laiz, and other variants in the same entry all show the phonetic elements are 來.
So, the normalization is reasonable and acceptable.
If yes, the IDS should be updated correspondingly, but the SC and TS should be kept.
U+21641 𡙁 is the unifiable variant of U+723D 爽 per UCV #108, but there is no K-Source reference for U+21641 𡙁 now.
It is better to use ⿱爽田 to match ROK conventions. The Korean reading provided by the submitter is 상, which is the same as 爽.
There is no K-Source under 戬, but K1-6B79 is under 戩.
The K-Source for U+9ED8 默 is K0-5979, but U+9ED9 黙 is K6-1021.
Suggest normalizing the K glyph to ⿱艹默.
There is no K-Source glyph under U+79C3 秃.
The following shows one page in the same year.
▲ 승정원일기 1725책 (탈초본 91책) 정조 18년 1월 1일 기축 24/46 기사 1794년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 59년 兵批의 관원현황
Under ROK conventions, the top is 3-stroke 艹, and under TCA and HK SAR conventions, the top is 卝.
On the evidence, the previous sub-sentence shows “山稻種於乾田” (n./plant v. prep. n./place), so this sub-sentence shows “泉～種於寒水”, that means “泉～” is also a kind of plant. It is not easy to know what it is.
The new evidence on Comment #9875, the right part of this character follows 戹 like 阸, 𩚬, 㧖, 呝.
Does TCA plan to normalize the glyph if possible?
See U+8794 螔, U+892B 褫, U+8B15 謕, U+29E9B 𩺛 and so on.
Evidence 2 shows the right part is the new component *U+2FAE6 (TCP-00136) in IRG N2878R2 ⺄ (related to 飞).
Also see U+57F6 埶, U+57F7 執, U+5B70 孰 and so on.
The glyph should be updated.
Right. Evidence 2 shows the corresponding English word is “paddles”, and the Cantonese reading should be pit3 dei6 lei4 si6.
U+328AE (xuổng) was submitted by Vietnam, but its right part is the real 敞 xưởng, not 敝 tệ.
For Component 穴, see V1-614C for U+7A7A 空 and V1-614D for U+7A7F 穿.
For Component 䍃, there are ⿱𱼀缶 and ⿱爫缶.
⿱𱼀缶
U+6416 搖 V1-5756 (no U+6447 摇)
U+9059 遙 V1-6956 (no U+9065 遥)
⿱爫缶
U+55C2 嗂 V2-8A79
U+7464 瑤 V1-5F35 (no U+7476 瑶)
U+8B20 謠 V1-6757 (no U+8B21 謡)
U+9DC2 鷂 V0-484E
U+4058 䁘 V3-3479
U+213DF 𡏟 V2-7331
U+24053 𤁓 V0-3B72
U+24060 𤁠 V2-7B22
U+31924 𱤤 VN-F02AD
U+31A4B 𱩋 VN-F0822
U+32947 VN-F191D
U+32AB7 VN-F19CB
U+33450 VN-F1C3B
The evidence shows the reading of the right part is diện, which must be 面.
U+617E 慾
U+2C173 𬅳
U+31720 𱜠
U+33218
But, the V glyph for U+6B32 欲 shows ⿰谷欠.
Maybe we can consider to add one VN Norm. Rule for ⿰𧮫欠 when it is used as the component.
There is no V-source reference under U+79C3 秃 now.
Remove the hook of the end of the left part to follow Vietnamese conventions. See the left part of the following characters.
U+5F11 V1-5447
U+6BBA V1-5B46
U+2ACBD V4-4B33
Remove the hook of the end of the left part to follow Vietnamese conventions. See the left part of the following characters.
U+5F11 V1-5447
U+6BBA V1-5B46
U+2ACBD V4-4B33
Editorial
Showing 50 comments.
[WS2021-00762]
This is a geographic name character.
[ {{WS2017-03140}} ]
But, now KC05501 is used under U+2E086 𮂆.
KC10116 is also ⿰禾厚.
Maybe the better reference for U+2E086 𮂆 is KC08090.
[WS2021-01439]
U+22DA7 𢶧 is a TF-Source character, so we don’t know how to confirm its usage.
⿰元全 is also included in TCA-CNS 11643 as TC-6B48.
Suggest TCA ask the company or TWMA to confirm the reading, and change the source, glyph and IDS to match TC-6B48 without updating SC, FS, TS.
It is better to keep them separately.
Other
Showing 293 comments.
For China, ⿰口欒 is included in ZHSJ PUA as U+F74FA, and zi.tools shows one source 《全宋金曲》卷九《張協狀元》第二齣.
For TCA, this is an important character in Southern Fujian (and Taiwanese) Puppet Opera (闽台木偶戏/閩臺木偶戲). TCA could check it in the real usage. (The translation principles are as follows: https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/655324771)
Similar to U+2B80F 𫠏
▲ 《中药腾敷袋及其制作方法》
Similar to 𡄙(U+21119).
This character will be useful for the IDSes of U+23CB6 𣲶 and U+26B49 𦭉.
[WS2021-01152]
Note that the 2nd stage simplified variant of 建 is 迠.
Similar to WS2021-01824:TB-4B6E
[WS2021-01824]
The pronunciation of TB-4B6E provided by TCA is also nǎo.
Based on UCV #336, TCA could do the horizontal extension in future.
Similar to 𥭅(U+25B45).
Similar to 芮(U+82AE).
If we can’t clarify the right part, it is better to keep current radical without more radicals.
Also the variant of U+592B 夫.
▲ 《漢魏六朝碑刻異體字典》第1262頁
I know him, and I once visited the former site of his former residence in Former Xuanwu District (宣武区) in Beijing.
▲ 文廷式: 《純常子枝語》, 民國刻本, juan 4, folio 16B
Is it here?
《宣宗成皇帝實録》 shows ⿰口福吐. 咪唎𠼤=UCS (American)
▲ 《宣宗成皇帝實録》, juan 398, folio 19
Is it suitable to treat this one as the bottom component of U+2E292 𮊒?
Similar to WS2021-01240:SAT-06176 ⿱丶平.
[WS2021-01240]
Similar to 𡽪(U+21F6A) and 𫶛(U+2BD9B).
▲ 승정원일기 1576책 (탈초본 84책) 정조 9년 2월 11일 신묘 57/58 기사 1785년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 50년
▲ 승정원일기 1598책 (탈초본 85책) 정조 10년 4월 4일 정축 31/32 기사 1786년 乾隆(淸/高宗) 51년
▲ 승정원일기 3099책 (탈초본 139책) 고종 35년 7월 27일 [양력9월12일] 무인 3/4 기사 1898년 光武 2년 光緖(淸/德宗) 24년
China also uses this word, but not common. Please see one Chinese example.
▲ 《明宣宗章皇帝實録》, 梁鴻志影本, 卷之六十四, folio 5B
The original form and the common form in China is 粉骨糜身, which comes from 《乞解軍務劄子》 written by 岳飛.
▲ 岳珂: 《金佗稡編》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷十五, 家集六, folio 1B
For Evidence 1, the word looks 吹薤. 吹薤欲成書 is from 庾肩吾’s poem.
The submitted evidence shows 聖敎諄～.
The proper form should be 諄複 (순복).
▲ CCAMC
Also written as 諄復.
▲ 승정원일기 647책 (탈초본 35책) 영조 3년 10월 5일 정해 19/26 기사 1727년 雍正(淸/世宗) 5년
There is a person named 姜馞 / 강발 there, but I can’t confirm if they are the same person.
When I searched 姜馞, I found one page, but I still not get more useful information now.
KC-07433 is ⿺廴巳, but looks not related.
Similar to 𡬏(U+21B0F).
31C0 CJK STROKE T
* 2nd stroke of 51B0
x XXXXX
Similar to 𮊐(U+2E290).
This character will be useful for the IDSes of U+29A92 𩪒 and U+2D28B 𭊋.
This character will be useful for the IDSes of U+2D697 𭚗 and U+321C5 𲇅.
Similar to 𢲘(U+22C98).
Similar to 踕(U+8E15).
Similar to 馽(U+99BD).
Similar to U+20681 𠚁
Similar to U+2157F 𡕿
This character will be useful for the IDSes of U+247B9 𤞹 and U+27AF2 𧫲.
Similar to 𭊞(U+2D29E).
Similar to 𲊋(U+3228B).
Similar to U+2484E 𤡎
Similar to 𡍤(U+21364).
cf. 渕//𰔂 vs 淵
Maybe this character is the variant of U+2BEE2 𫻢 (aka 懿) according to the reading.
The semantic rationale of VN-F17B2 is different from U+2BEE2 𫻢.
This character will be useful for the IDSes of U+21715 𡜕 and U+2664E 𦙎.
Similar to 濎(U+6FCE).
Similar to 𤾎(U+24F8E).
Similar to 𦍚(U+2635A).
Maybe it is the variant of 美.
Similar to 𩮧(U+29BA7).
This character will be useful for the IDS of U+304F4 𰓴 and U+31908 𱤈.
The variant of 那.
▲ 曾良《明清小说俗字典》p430
It is the top component of U+2D309 𭌉.
It is better to modify the KC-06105 glyph U+2D309 𭌉 to ⿱那𠵨.
▲ 이미지뷰어 - 불교학술원 아카이브
▲ （唐） 阿質達霰 譯《穢跡金剛說神通大滿陀羅尼法術靈要門》穢迹金剛說神通大滿陁羅尼法術靈要門一卷，高麗藏本
▲ （唐） 無能勝 譯《穢跡金剛説神通大滿陀羅尼法術靈要門經》四經同卷 《穢跡金剛說神通大滿陀羅尼法術靈要門經》，乾隆藏本
▲ （明） 袾宏 著、（明） 王宇春 編《雲棲法匯》法界聖凢水陸勝㑹修齋儀𮜿卷第一 《△下文族姓家用》，嘉興藏本
▲ 大正新修大藏經·密教部四·T21.1229·唐·阿質達霰譯·穢跡金剛禁百變法經·一卷
▲ 大正新修大藏經·密教部四·T21.1228·唐·阿質達霰譯·穢跡金剛說神通大滿陀羅尼法術靈要門·一卷
On the other hand, ROK could do the horizontal extension for this character later, but there is no KC- or K6-Source references now.
Similar to 莽(U+83BD).
Similar to 粁(U+7C81).
Similar to 𥧳(U+259F3).
Similar to 𢖷(U+225B7).
This character will be useful for the IDSes of U+81F1 臱, U+217B6 𡞶, U+25302 𥌂, U+29B87 𩮇 and WS2021-01812:TD-3C58.
[WS2021-01812]
Similar to 䏈(U+43C8).
Similar to 棖(U+68D6).
Similar to 𧶞(U+27D9E).
Similar to 鵄(U+9D44).
Similar to 𡓩(U+214E9).
Similar to 𬟤(U+2C7E4).
The corresponding IDS(es) is/are shown as ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 and ⿰山气 in BabelStone, but only ⿰山气 in zi.tools.
However, ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 is the the variant of 屹, and the right part is also the variant of 乞. The final consonant (辅音韵尾) is -t. ⿳𠂉一乙 has not been encoded separately.
There is also one ⿰山气 in SJ/T 11239—2001 as 26-64.
The corresponding glyph of U+2AA26 𪨦 is also shown as ⿰山气 in GB 18030—2022 (0x9836CA34).
On the other hand, TC-2A6B looks related to A01101-004, but the glyph of A01101-004 shows ⿰山气, and the source shows ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 cited from 《正字通》.
UK-30010 looks related to ⿰山气, and the usage of UK-30010 supports ⿰山气.
We need to consider how to handle them later.
Similar to WS2021-02524:TE-2753
[WS2021-02524]
[WS2021-03619]
[WS2021-00651]
𬫂 U+2CAC2 in Unicode, 17.0.0
I checked the pronunciation data in my hand, and I found the Zhuang reading in 上思 is leːk⁷, in 德保 is lek⁷. These two are possibly related to 龙州.
However, this mapping is wrong.
▲ Row 43 in GB/T 7590—1987
The above picture shows 43-67 is U+304C6 𰓆. RS values for 扻𰓆抅 are all 64.4.
▲ Row 43 in GB/T 13132 (provided by Xieyang Wang)
So, G5-4B63 should be U+6440 摀.
The G-Source reference for U+3A36 㨶 could be changed to GKX.
This character will be useful for the IDSes of U+24BF9 𤯹, U+2C2CC 𬋌 and U+3152E 𱔮.
Similar to U+2D223 𭈣.
Similar to 𮂺(U+2E0BA).
Similar to 椇(U+6907).
𫛩～ means 鹌鹑 here.
BTW, could we change #333a 禀稟 from NUCV to UCV (lv. 2)?
Similar to U+22618 𢘘.
Similar to U+23499 𣒙
Similar to U+20D42 𠵂
⿰木与 has not been encoded yet. (VN-F0287)
Similar to 耡(U+8021).
Similar to U+26EF7 𦻷
▲ 승정원일기 2963책 (탈초본 136책) 고종 24년 7월 3일 무오 10/10 기사 1887년 光緖(淸/德宗) 13년
Similar to 𬼀(U+2CF00).
[WS2021-04442]
The Gin reading of this character is ʦiːn², the tone value is 21 in 𬇕尾, which corresponds to 阳平. As we know, some 𬇕尾 people reads the Hanzi derived from the Chinese Yue-sub-dialects in Southern Guangxi and Western Guangdong (桂南粤西).
In 桂南粤西, 传 reads ʦʰin¹¹ or ʦʰiŋ¹¹, because they didn’t need to distinguish the finals -in and -yun in Cantonese.
專 also reads ʦiːn¹ in 𬇕尾, that means this reading matches the analysis, which is similar to the Zhuang 老借 reading as cien. It reads chuyên in Vietnamese (A1).
We also need to change #333a 禀稟 from NUCV to UCV (lv. 2)? See .
U+20DA0 𠶠 reads trẹ, and the right part is 治 trị.
Data for Unihan
Showing 108 comments.
U+2369F 𣚟
▲ CJK Ideographs Search System
And the better simplified form of this character should be ⿰月𫔭.
Ming Fan once requested for this disunification in IRG N2338.
《壮汉英词典》 includes this word, so I think it is OK to treat the value as the non-* one. BTW, 《古壮字字典》 does not include this word.
Maybe we can consider creating this property in future.
kZhuang nyaij
kFanqie 透河
𪿢 is also the variant of 辟. The reading of this character comes from the bottom part 𪿢<辟. So, this is the On’yomi reading.
Note that this is not the variant of U+3814 㠔 based on the reading. (The tone of 㠔 is not the entering/入声, it is 方賣切.)
We have not handled the numeric values for all the Chữ Nôm related to the Vietnamese word “rằm”.
U+2013B kVietnameseNumeric 5 15 # 𠄻, update
U+26743 kVietnameseNumeric 15 # 𦝃, new
U+26746 kVietnameseNumeric 15 # 𦝆, new
U+2AC6C kVietnameseNumeric 15 # 𪱬, new
U+2C0C2 kVietnameseNumeric 15 # 𬃂, new
U+3240B kVietnameseNumeric 15 # , new
We also need to handle the following issues.
For U+26743 𦝃, it is related to two words: ròm and rằm. The radical of ròm is 肉, and the radical of rằm is 月. There is one word used in Chinese Min-nan dialects for the meaning of “testicle”.
▲ TCA-CNS 11643-2007 (10-7940) uses the component moon
For U+26746 𦝆, it is related to three words: ròm, sần and rằm. The radical of ròm or sần is 肉, and the radical of rằm is 月.
▲ TCA-CNS 11643-2007 (10-7943) uses the component moon
Also see WS2024-01849 (Comment #12433).