[Mr. Ma Shijie provided the comments, but what he wrote is not clear enough. Eiso rewrites after studying.]
The submitted character related to one word 醇～ on the evidence, which should be the variant form of the word 淳龐, that means the local people are honest and warm-hearted or the local customs are simple and homely. This is a stable word.
U+5390 厐 is the variant of 龐 or 龎. The only barrier is that we don’t have the UCV or any rule to support the unification.
Unify to 挲 (U+6332)? The evidence shows the Vietnamese word “ma sa”, that means 摩挲. There is no V-Source under U+6332 挲, maybe it is OK to do the horizontal extension to U+6332 挲 if IRG agrees, or add it to IVD in future.
Both are the vulgar term for sexual intercourse, and the readings are both địt. Based on the current evidence, the phonetic element is 迭, and the semantic element is 气.
We can consider using this V glyph and RS, TS, IDS for U+28540 𨕀, but keep V2-7A3B as the V-Source reference if unified.
Based on three pieces of evidence (2 submitted and 1 new), the glyph should be ⿵门⿱𰁜大 not ⿵门奕. Evidence 1 shows the Putonghua reading is luán, that means the top of the inside part is 𰁜, the variant of 䜌 not 亦.
In PRC conventions, 𰁜 and 亦 are not the same. So, the theoretical traditional form should be ⿵門⿱䜌大 not ⿵門奕.
Add the secondary radical as 122.0 (网), SC=13, FS=1
For this character, the semantic element is 罙 (<深, the corresponding Bouyei word is lag [lak⁸] ⿰氵㓁), the phonetic element is 革 (<勒 laeg. This is 老借, and the corresponding 新借 is lwz).
For U+23F37 𣼷, SE=氵/水, PE=勒/laeg.
For U+3072F 𰜯, SE=深/水, PE=力/lig.
For this case, the semantic rationale is that the semantic element is 烏 based on the corresponding Chinese word of “crow” 烏鴉, the phonetic element is 戈 (qua). The current only radical of 烏 is R86.0, so we use R86.0 firstly.
If we add the secondary RS for U+70CF 烏 as 196.-1, the secondary RS for U+4E4C 乌 as 196'.-1, we can consider using R196 as the preliminary radical, and SC=3 (-1+4), FS=1.
The RS for the following variants of 烏/乌 should be considered to be updated correspondingly.
U+200B6 𠂶 196.-1?
U+2CEC6 𬻆 196.-4 (-1-3)? cf. U+2B813 𫠓
U+2DD1A 𭴚 196.-1?
There are other characters related the components 烏/乌.
U+3137C 𱍼 196'.2 (-1+3)?
Change Radical to 108.0 (皿) or add it as the secondary one, SC=15, FS=3
The semantic element is 盘, and the phonetic element is 音. 音 reads as ʔɤm¹ and ʔom¹
Radical
For Comment #10021, understand Lee’s comment. In IRG N2412R, the authors pointed out this issue, and IRG discussed it during IRG #53 in Shenzhen. The following is the recommendation IRG M53.6.
In the subsequent actual operation in our review works, we include two kinds of radicals. We may have the following possibilities, and we can choose one of them.
(1) The intuitive radical is the primary one, the semantic radical is the secondary one.
(2) The semantic radical is the primary one, the intuitive radical is the secondary one.
▲ 张显飞: 《战功图——艺术与皇权的交织（1762—1829）》 [The Confluence of Art & Power (《青铜纪/Resonating through Ideas》)], 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2025.2, ISBN 978-7-5039-7498-4, p. 132
▲ 李芒: 《北流话研究》, 南宁: 广西民族出版社, 2012.7, ISBN 978-7-5363-6455-4, p. 203
▲ 李芒: 《北流话研究》, 南宁: 广西民族出版社, 2012.7, ISBN 978-7-5363-6455-4, p. 204
The CCTV-10 program {{https://tv.cctv.cn/2021/11/07/VIDE1IJLo7YaX34n6i61cbZk211107.shtml
《地理·中国》 20211107 北流探秘（下）}} shows this food in 20:28-22:16, but they used the character as “助”.
In one short video in WeChat Video Account (微信视频号), there was one dialogue as below, and we can treat it as the encoding request from the users.
▲ 于白; 周勋初; 章培恒, 安平秋, 马樟根: 《梁书选译（修订版）》 (《古代文史名著选译丛书 》), 南京: 凤凰出版社, 2011.5, ISBN 978-7-5506-0342-4, p. 71
▲ 张翼健: 《高级中学语文第四册教学参考书》, 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1988.6, ISBN 7-107-00106-X, p. 329
▲ 柏俊才: 《文化视阈下的北魏文学研究》 (A Study of Literature of the Northern Wei Dynasty from the Perspective of Culture), 西安: 陕西新华出版传媒集团陕西人民出版社, 2022.7, ISBN 978-7-224-14573-1, p. 51
▲ 戴平: 《中国民族服饰文化研究》, 上海: 世纪出版集团上海人民出版社, 2000.3, ISBN 7-208-03359-5/K·797, p. 202
For Evidence 1, I checked the materials for the person mentioned in the red square.
The following 3 pieces of pictures show the name is 高盘九.
▲ 中国经济学团体联合会秘书处, 中国企业管理协会办公室: 《中国经济学团体概况》, 中国经济学团体联合会内部发行, 1984.6, p. 305 (related to 福建省金融学会)
▲ 鲁杰: 《元帅痴情强国梦——朱德与新中国》 (《伟人与新中国丛书》), 南宁: 广西人民出版社, 1999.4, ISBN 7-219-03954-9/K·792, p. 136
▲ 朱德兴, 王克: 《活跃在路西平原上的济南乡师学生抗日教导队》//中共台前县委党史研究室, 台前县地方史志编纂中心: 《台前红色记忆（第三辑）》 (《中共台前县革命历史资料丛书》), 内部发行, 2019.12, p. 385
This one shows he is the brother of 高赞非 who is one modern confucianist (儒学家) of Neo-Confucianism (新儒学), and the student of 熊十力, 梁漱溟, 欧阳竟无, 吕瀓诸 and so on.
The following 2 pieces of pictures show the name is 高磐九.
▲ 中共福建省委统战部, 中共福建省委党研室, 福建省档案馆: 《中国资本主义工商业的社会主义改造（福建卷）》 (《中国共产党历史资料丛书》), 北京: 中共党史出版社, 1992.11, ISBN 7-80023-519-X/K·45, p. 251 (《中共福建省委关于资本主义工商业改造工作的报告（草稿）（1955年12月30日）》)
▲ 厦门市山东南下干部历史研究会, 厦门市鹭海英烈慈善基金会, 厦门大学历史系: 《新中国成立初期入闽南下干部研究（1949—1966）》, 厦门: 福建鹭江出版社, 2022.2, ISBN 978-7-5459-1961-5, p. 315
It looks not easy to confirm which one is correct, or both are correct, that means we can not confirm the variant based on Evidence 1. Evidence 2 shows current geographic name is 吉林省吉林市磐石市.
▲ 赫崇壮, 马洪涛; 曲杲: 《辽宁省岫岩县地名资料汇编（一）》, 鞍山: 辽宁省岫岩县地名办公室, 1981.5, p. 22
▲ 张其卓: 《满族在岫岩》, 沈阳: 辽宁人民出版社, 1984.7, 统一书号 11090·110, p. 12
▲ 岫岩县志编辑部: 《岫岩县志》, 沈阳: 辽宁大学出版社, 1989.6, ISBN 7-5610-0598-9/K·36, p. 68
The place is in current 辽宁省鞍山市岫岩满族自治县. ⿱艹憨葱 means 藜芦 as one kind of traditional Chinese medicinal material. The other vulgar name is 旱葱. ⿱艹憨 has not been encoded, so the local people just use 憨葱沟, and some book on traditional Chinese medicine also use 憨葱, all of them are not suitable based on the ancient books. There is also one place named 旱葱沟 in current 吉林省白山市浑江区, but the name has been changed to 旱沟村.
▲ 陈从周: 《古建之美》, 南京: 江苏凤凰文艺出版社, 2023.4, ISBN 978-7-5594-7036-2, pp. 220-221, 223
In Evidence 2, 陶然亭 is located in Xicheng District, Beijing City (formerly Xuanwu District), but 兰亭 there is copied the real 兰亭 which is located in 浙江省绍兴市柯桥区兰亭村.
The Zhuang reading of U+316B9 𱚹 is sux*. For the standard reading, the tone mark -x/-ч corresponds to 阳上 (John said this reading is used in Longzhou Zhuang), but the tone of 昼 should be 阴去 (-q/-ƽ). On the other hand, the middle Chinese finals (韵母) of 手 and 昼 are the same, and one 老借 reading of 手 I collected is suj; that 知母 reads as [s-]/[θ-] is very common. For common 腔词结合 rule in Cantonese Yueju Opera, Cantonese Yuequ Show and Cantonese pop songs, 阳上 (Tone 5) and 阴去 (Tone 3) could mean to the same musical scale, such as 上 (Gongche) for 平喉.
The semantic rationale of U+316B9 𱚹 in Zhuang and Tày is still NOT obvious. If it is the way like 臼 and 旧, 幺 and 么 to distinguish the meanings, the submitted glyph is acceptable; if we can not confirm this, it is better to change the glyph to match the evidence.
The submitted character is a 韻脚, and the previous one 差 is 차 (Mand: cī, Cant: ci1), the next one 姿 is 자 (Mand: zī, Cant: zi1), so the final (중성+종성) must be ㅏ. 頿 also reads as 자, and the meaning matches the poem.
The evidence shows “按遼薊三千餘里，冠蓋所往來，舟車所要衝。統浿～四十二州，川蜀之殷富，蘇杭之佳麗。” 遼薊 means 遼地 (current 辽宁) and 薊地 (current 河北, 北京, 天津), 川蜀 means current 四川 and 重庆, 蘇杭 means 蘇州 (苏州) and 杭州, so 浿～ must be one or two places. 《舊唐書·卷三十九·志第十九》 shows “高麗本五部，一百七十六城，户六十九萬七千。其年十二月，分高麗地為九都督府，四十二州，一百縣，置安東都護府於平壤城以統之。” The year (其年) means 總章元年 (aka 668 A.D.), so that 四十二州 means Koryo (高麗/고려). 浿水 means current Taedong River in current Phyeongyang and other cities and provinces of DPRK/North Korea, so ～ may be the other river in Koryo, but I can’t find which one is.
It looks a very important geographical term in Korean. We should take it more carefully.
Evidence
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Thanks for Huang Junliang’s help, the river should be 薩水 in the Chinese ancient books, which is current Ch'ongch'on River (淸川江/청천강) in DPRK/North Korea. 《北史·列傳·卷七十九》 shows “東濟薩水，去平壤城三十里”. 《朝鮮王朝實錄》 shows “平安道有急, 則將長山串以西兵船, 載於阿郞浦, 則平壤 浿江、安州 薩水漕可通也。” 安州 is under Phyeongannamto (平安南道/평안남도) now.
The evidence shows the place 王村 is near to the border of 茂名, which means current 茂名市电白区沙院镇 (formerly under 茂港区). See the following.
起=杨梅村, 途经1=博茂社区, 途经2=老鸦埇村, 途经3=旭金村, 途经4=碌西村, 途经5=王村港村, 终=沙院镇
That means it is the variant of 旭. The local people in 覃巴, 王村港 and 沙院 speak Leizhou dialects (under Chinese Min-nan dialects), but some geographic names look not like the common Han names (汉名).
U+24C19 𤰙 is a dialectal ideograph used for Chinese Mandarin dialects with 𤰚 as 𤰙𤰚 which is similar to 旮旯. U+24C19 𤰙 and the submitted characters can’t be unifiable based on both of the submitted evidence and the new evidence.
This article is 《黄鶴樓説》. This character is related to one personal name, but there are different version of the name in history like 閻伯珵, 閻伯理, 閻伯瑾 and this one.
▲ 俞汝捷, 余启新: 《黄鹤楼与名人》 (《中国名胜与名人丛书》), 北京: 旅游教育出版社, 1997.10, ISBN 7-5637-0729-8, p. 215
The following books use other characters, but it looks unreasonable. I just list them here.
▲ 蔣維錟, 鄭麗航: 《媽祖文獻史料彙編（第一辑） 散文卷》, 北京: 中國檔案出版社, 2007.10, ISBN 978-7-80166-895-0, p. 25
It uses U+4483 䒃, and shows why they change the character.
▲ 蔡国耀: 《开台妈祖——莆仙与台湾关系史》, 福州: 海风出版社, 2013.5, ISBN 978-7-5512-0101-8, p. 379
It also uses U+4483 䒃.
▲ 广东海上丝绸之路博物馆: 《阳江木船传统建造技术与风俗》, 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2018.12, ISBN 978-7-5359-7026-8, p. 118
It uses ⿰舟参 which should be unified to U+26A53 𦩓. ⿰舟參 is also not encoded.
Both of the previous three ones are not the characters in URO, that means the authors or editors have some comments on the corresponding words. The books all mentioned 福州 (even current 闽侯县 or 闽侯经济技术开发区), but we have no materials to prove it is the word used in Chinese Min-dong dialects.
《媽祖文獻史料彙編（第一辑） 散文卷》 mentioned the character should be modified to 䒃, and the editors mentioned the ancient book. The following books show the modern studies on 䒃 and its variant 艁. It is very clear that 艁 in 揚雄《方言》 means 浮桥 (pontoon bridge?), not the wood at the bottom of one boat (船之底木). So, it is not better to change the character to 艁 or 䒃.
▲ 殷寄明: 《〈说文解字〉精读》 (《原典精读系列》), 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2007.4, ISBN 978-7-309-04816-2/I·341, p. 169
This one mentioned 艁 is the variant of U+3035F 𰍟.
▲ 華學誠: 《〈方言〉及其注本三論》 (《揚雄研究系列叢書》), 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2018.3, ISBN 978-7-5531-0947-3, p. 140
▲ 熊铁基: 《熊铁基文集 第五卷 秦汉军事制度史（附未刊稿）》, 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社, 2021.12, ISBN 978-7-5622-9467-2, p. 197
The evidence shows ⿰⿱且八故 and its variant ⿰⿱且八古 (của). ⿰⿱且八古 should be U+27D51 𧵑. The Vietnamese words “của” or “của cải” are related to “wealth”, so the semantic element is 貝. The normalization for this case is acceptable.
The evidence shows the Zhuang reading is gyəmƽ (aka gyaemq) and the meaning is 紫色 (purple).
▲ 《壮汉英词典》, p. 569
The component 门 is often used to the meanings of colours, that means the semantic element is 门 (related to colour) and the phonetic element is 金 (currently 老借 is gim, but I trust gyaem is more ancient form). Therefore, there is no need to change anything.
The second horizontal stroke (横) of the bottom left component 牛 should not be 避让 to become 提. The glyph shown on the evidence has been matched PRC conventions.
Current glyph shows ⿰月㚥, but the IDS is ⿰月奸. The evidence shows the rationale is nhục (肉) & gian (奸), so it is better to normalize the glyph to match the IDS and the rationale.
The reading of the submitted character is nhăn. There is no Vietnamese usage for 㚥 currently, that means there is also no Vietnamese reading for it. The phonetic element of 㚥 is 于, which reads vo, vu, vò and so on in Vietnamese and no consonant coda in the syllable when it is used as the phonetic element.
The evidence for this character and WS2021-03520 don’t show the usage for the geographic names, but the G-Source for this character is GDM. Could we need to know how to use this one for the geographic names?
Thank you for the evidences mentioned in Comment #5562. If ⿰女亻 could be unified with ⿰女人, we can consider to add them to the CAAPH IVD collection in future (just consider).
If we decide to unify this one to U+2CD98 𬶘, and update the G glyph. I suggest using GCCPP-00035 for U+2CD98. The submitted evidence of GJZ-00265 shows it is a typo.
It looks it is better to disunify SAT-03743 ⿱艹裝 to a new code point as UNC, RS=145.11, TS=17, FS=2. We also need to check if there are other similar issues.
The phonetic element must be 韋 (viz? The 老借 form of 位 is vih, and the 新借 form of 韦 is veiz, and 位 is vei), but it is not easy to understand the semantic rationale of the right part 迷. 《古壮字字典》 shows two relative entries, one is used for the Zhuang word “maex” (wife), the other one is used for the Zhuang word “mwh” (period, time). On the other hand, the 老借 form of 迷 is maez, the 新借 form is miz.
If we can’t clarify the right part, it is better to keep current radical without more radicals.
In L2/22-282, I once showed this character is needed in two new TV series produced by TVB in Hong Kong SAR, China, which are 《超能使者》 (I’ve Got The Power, 2022) and 《輕·︁功》 (Go With The Float, 2022). I also found it is used in a new TV series named 《痞子无間道》 (Your Finesse, 2025). But, they just used the traditional form.
The same as Z2-6 mentioned in IRG N2733R, but it is the real Hanzi/Kanji. It is better to remove it from the CJK component. It will be a helpful one for IDS. We can add it to UCV with 工 as the components but encode this one separately.
The current kVietnamese property value is lâu (semantic element is 舊), and the Vietnamese reading for the submitted character is cũ (semantic element is 屢).
IRG Working Set 2024v2.0
Source: Eiso CHAN
Date: Generated on 2026-08-19
Labels
Showing 1849 comments.
Unification
Showing 41 comments.
U+2B73C in Unicode, 17.0.0 Alpha
The code point has been stable.
Unify to 𣶍 (U+23D8D) per UCV #363, but I don’t know if this UCV is useful.
Unified to 㴱 U+3D31 or 𣵫 U+23D6B?
Based on the evidence, it is also the variant of 深.
See WS2017-02033.
[ {{WS2017-02033}} ]
Unify to 𡝩 (U+21769)?
unify to 厐 (U+5390)?
[Mr. Ma Shijie provided the comments, but what he wrote is not clear enough. Eiso rewrites after studying.]
The submitted character related to one word 醇～ on the evidence, which should be the variant form of the word 淳龐, that means the local people are honest and warm-hearted or the local customs are simple and homely. This is a stable word.
U+5390 厐 is the variant of 龐 or 龎. The only barrier is that we don’t have the UCV or any rule to support the unification.
Unify or normalize to 𪥎 (U+2A94E)?
They are both the variant of 奊, see here. If it is cited from the one-off evidence, it is better to use the encoded character directly.
Unify to 𦅣 (U+26163)
See WS2021-01283
[WS2021-01283]
Unify to 甿 (U+753F) and add 亾兦 to UCV #143.
Unified to 讟 (U+8B9F) in irg51.
See WS2017-04035
[ {{WS2017-04035}} ]
The IVSes for this UCV pair (刀 vs 力) has been requested in IRG N2796.
There is no ⿰召刀 used in CAAPH data now. We will check this one later.
Unified to 演 (U+6F14) or 𤀋 (U+2400B), add the UCV for the right components 寅~𡩟 (K is ⿱宀臾)~⿱宀㬰.
The evidence shows the fanqie is 延典.
Unify to 𰲕 (U+30C95)
When we check the submitted evidence of U+30C95 𰲕 SAT-06065 (aka WS2015-03675), the fanqie is also 鄧能反.
They are cognate, and I suggest adding UCV for 𣳾 and 𭜮 as Lv. 2.
Unify to 㱿 (U+3C7F)?
We need a new UCV for 𡉉 and 𠕓 like UCV #222a.
Unify to 遝 (U+905D)
⿺辶⿱罒⿻亻𠔁 is very similar to 遝 and they are cognates.
Same sources.
Unify to 涤 as Comment #3121.
UCV #194 has been expanded at IRG #63, see Appendix B.18 of IRG N2703 Editorial Report for IRG Meeting #63.
unify to 貶 (U+8CB6)
The reading shows biǎn, the same as 貶. Also see WS2024-02659:T13-2F44 ⿰石之
unify to 𫃛 (U+2B0DB)?
全字庫 shows the reading of U+2B0DB 𫃛 is also yìn.
Unify to 𥹦 (U+25E66)?
cf. UCV #55
Same sources.
Add ⿻王⿰丿乛, U+2D170 𭅰, U+2E4D7 𮓗, U+2D16F 𭅯, U+2CEC9 𬻉 to UCV #311 as lv. 1.
Unify to 𬜮 (U+2C72E).
See GB 18030—2022, 0x9932BD36
unify to 工?
The Japanese reading of this character is コウ, which is the same as 工.
This one has not been unified to 躔 (U+8E94) yet.
Unify to 挲 (U+6332)? The evidence shows the Vietnamese word “ma sa”, that means 摩挲. There is no V-Source under U+6332 挲, maybe it is OK to do the horizontal extension to U+6332 挲 if IRG agrees, or add it to IVD in future.
Unify to WS2021-02721:VN-F1A6D per UCV #272.
Unify to 滗?
The evidence shows the variant is 潷 and the Putonghua/Mandarin reading is bì.
unify to 𨨫 (U+28A2B) per UCV #336.
The evidence shows the reading is hái, and the semantic element is 金, the phonetic element is 采. The evidence shows they are unifiable variants.
consider unifying to 𨕀 (U+28540)
Both are the vulgar term for sexual intercourse, and the readings are both địt. Based on the current evidence, the phonetic element is 迭, and the semantic element is 气.
We can consider using this V glyph and RS, TS, IDS for U+28540 𨕀, but keep V2-7A3B as the V-Source reference if unified.
We also found unencoded ⿰土⿸尸土 (坭) and ⿰氵⿸尸土 (泥).
Attributes
Showing 249 comments.
Based on Evidence 2, the meaning is related to “hawk”, Evidence 1 looks the variant of 鹞.
The evidence shows it is the variant of 荡/蕩, and the top component of 昜 is 日 not 曰, so 汨 is more suitable.
Based on three pieces of evidence (2 submitted and 1 new), the glyph should be ⿵门⿱𰁜大 not ⿵门奕. Evidence 1 shows the Putonghua reading is luán, that means the top of the inside part is 𰁜, the variant of 䜌 not 亦.
In PRC conventions, 𰁜 and 亦 are not the same. So, the theoretical traditional form should be ⿵門⿱䜌大 not ⿵門奕.
We can find 峦塘 and 栾塘 in 永福县.
This Zhuang word “guk” means “tiger”.
▲ 《壮汉英词典》, p. 533
《古壮字字典》 shows ⿺虎骨.
[WS2021-03500]
Based on Evidence 1, this is used for one geographic name, so 163.0 is more suitable. The traditional form 䣕 (U+48D5) also shows 163.0.
The secondary radical could be consider to be removed.
The primary radical could be consider to be removed.
贫 looks the phonetic element.
For this character, the semantic element is 罙 (<深, the corresponding Bouyei word is lag [lak⁸] ⿰氵㓁), the phonetic element is 革 (<勒 laeg. This is 老借, and the corresponding 新借 is lwz).
For U+23F37 𣼷, SE=氵/水, PE=勒/laeg.
For U+3072F 𰜯, SE=深/水, PE=力/lig.
夊 is not included in the glyph
Support HKSAR (Comment #3294).
If Comment #7672 been accepted, IDS should be updated as well.
不 in the submitted IDS is U+F967
See the radical
⿱甫土 is not an encoded character, and there is no evidence to support it. U+25B89 𥮉 has been encoded, and the K-Source reference is K6-1118.
Agree with Conifer on Comment #2271. ROK could normalize the glyph.
The variant of 褻 (U+893B)
Move 140.0 as the secondary radical.
It is also normalized the glyph to match IDS and Evidence 2 not 3.
This character is used a very common Chinese Min nan word, 美 is the semantic element, 水 is the phonetic element.
The reading is ㄍㄧㆬ, that means 金 is the phonetic element, and 光 is the semantic element. The radical of 光 is 儿 in KX.
or normalize the glyph to match current IDS.
TCA didn’t provide the reading, but 全字庫 shows yīn.
Maybe this character is also the variant of 韻 or 𩐳 in some usages. So, the phonetic element could be 音.
IRGN945AR
Move R142.0 虫 to the secondary one, SC=5, FS=3.
If we add the secondary RS for U+70CF 烏 as 196.-1, the secondary RS for U+4E4C 乌 as 196'.-1, we can consider using R196 as the preliminary radical, and SC=3 (-1+4), FS=1.
The RS for the following variants of 烏/乌 should be considered to be updated correspondingly.
U+200B6 𠂶 196.-1?
U+2CEC6 𬻆 196.-4 (-1-3)? cf. U+2B813 𫠓
U+2DD1A 𭴚 196.-1?
There are other characters related the components 烏/乌.
U+3137C 𱍼 196'.2 (-1+3)?
U+31AF3 𱫳 196.3 (-1+4)?
WS2021-01355 ⿰乌恶 196'.9 (-1+10)?
[WS2021-01355]
句 (hook) is the semantic element.
[WS2021-02254]
⿰&Z5-01;免
See WS2021-01904:VN-F1BDD
[WS2021-01904]
The semantic element is 盘, and the phonetic element is 音. 音 reads as ʔɤm¹ and ʔom¹
In the subsequent actual operation in our review works, we include two kinds of radicals. We may have the following possibilities, and we can choose one of them.
(1) The intuitive radical is the primary one, the semantic radical is the secondary one.
(2) The semantic radical is the primary one, the intuitive radical is the secondary one.
Evidence
Showing 187 comments.
▲ 张显飞: 《战功图——艺术与皇权的交织（1762—1829）》 [The Confluence of Art & Power (《青铜纪/Resonating through Ideas》)], 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2025.2, ISBN 978-7-5039-7498-4, p. 132
▲ 张记石磨白～凉糕馆 on 藤县
▲ 张记石磨白～凉糕馆 on 藤县
▲ 张记石磨白～凉糕馆 on 藤县
▲ 张记石磨白～凉糕馆 on 藤县
▲ 北流市李金小吃店
▲ 李芒: 《北流话研究》, 南宁: 广西民族出版社, 2012.7, ISBN 978-7-5363-6455-4, p. 203
▲ 李芒: 《北流话研究》, 南宁: 广西民族出版社, 2012.7, ISBN 978-7-5363-6455-4, p. 204
The CCTV-10 program {{https://tv.cctv.cn/2021/11/07/VIDE1IJLo7YaX34n6i61cbZk211107.shtml
《地理·中国》 20211107 北流探秘（下）}} shows this food in 20:28-22:16, but they used the character as “助”.
In one short video in WeChat Video Account (微信视频号), there was one dialogue as below, and we can treat it as the encoding request from the users.
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 75-59
▲ 《汉语格言分类词典》编写组: 《汉语格言分类词典》, 呼和浩特: 内蒙古人民出版社, 1991.12, ISBN 7-204-01443-X/H·16, p. 869
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 77-17
▲ 于白; 周勋初; 章培恒, 安平秋, 马樟根: 《梁书选译（修订版）》 (《古代文史名著选译丛书 》), 南京: 凤凰出版社, 2011.5, ISBN 978-7-5506-0342-4, p. 71
▲ 张翼健: 《高级中学语文第四册教学参考书》, 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1988.6, ISBN 7-107-00106-X, p. 329
▲ 柏俊才: 《文化视阈下的北魏文学研究》 (A Study of Literature of the Northern Wei Dynasty from the Perspective of Culture), 西安: 陕西新华出版传媒集团陕西人民出版社, 2022.7, ISBN 978-7-224-14573-1, p. 51
▲ 戴平: 《中国民族服饰文化研究》, 上海: 世纪出版集团上海人民出版社, 2000.3, ISBN 7-208-03359-5/K·797, p. 202
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 42-71
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 83-03
▲ 蓟县志编修委员会: 《蓟县志》, 天津: 南开大学出版社 & 天津: 天津社会科学院出版社, 1991.12, ISBN 7-310-00490-61/K·44, p. 592
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 30-80
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 218
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 39-06
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 40-38
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 40-40
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 75-71
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 5856
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 36-66
The following 3 pieces of pictures show the name is 高盘九.
▲ 中国经济学团体联合会秘书处, 中国企业管理协会办公室: 《中国经济学团体概况》, 中国经济学团体联合会内部发行, 1984.6, p. 305 (related to 福建省金融学会)
▲ 鲁杰: 《元帅痴情强国梦——朱德与新中国》 (《伟人与新中国丛书》), 南宁: 广西人民出版社, 1999.4, ISBN 7-219-03954-9/K·792, p. 136
▲ 朱德兴, 王克: 《活跃在路西平原上的济南乡师学生抗日教导队》//中共台前县委党史研究室, 台前县地方史志编纂中心: 《台前红色记忆（第三辑）》 (《中共台前县革命历史资料丛书》), 内部发行, 2019.12, p. 385
This one shows he is the brother of 高赞非 who is one modern confucianist (儒学家) of Neo-Confucianism (新儒学), and the student of 熊十力, 梁漱溟, 欧阳竟无, 吕瀓诸 and so on.
The following 2 pieces of pictures show the name is 高磐九.
▲ 中共福建省委统战部, 中共福建省委党研室, 福建省档案馆: 《中国资本主义工商业的社会主义改造（福建卷）》 (《中国共产党历史资料丛书》), 北京: 中共党史出版社, 1992.11, ISBN 7-80023-519-X/K·45, p. 251 (《中共福建省委关于资本主义工商业改造工作的报告（草稿）（1955年12月30日）》)
▲ 厦门市山东南下干部历史研究会, 厦门市鹭海英烈慈善基金会, 厦门大学历史系: 《新中国成立初期入闽南下干部研究（1949—1966）》, 厦门: 福建鹭江出版社, 2022.2, ISBN 978-7-5459-1961-5, p. 315
It looks not easy to confirm which one is correct, or both are correct, that means we can not confirm the variant based on Evidence 1. Evidence 2 shows current geographic name is 吉林省吉林市磐石市.
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-75
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-86
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-81
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-92
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-17
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-30
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-36
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-45
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-46
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-53
▲ 赫崇壮, 马洪涛; 曲杲: 《辽宁省岫岩县地名资料汇编（一）》, 鞍山: 辽宁省岫岩县地名办公室, 1981.5, p. 22
▲ 张其卓: 《满族在岫岩》, 沈阳: 辽宁人民出版社, 1984.7, 统一书号 11090·110, p. 12
▲ 岫岩县志编辑部: 《岫岩县志》, 沈阳: 辽宁大学出版社, 1989.6, ISBN 7-5610-0598-9/K·36, p. 68
The place is in current 辽宁省鞍山市岫岩满族自治县. ⿱艹憨葱 means 藜芦 as one kind of traditional Chinese medicinal material. The other vulgar name is 旱葱. ⿱艹憨 has not been encoded, so the local people just use 憨葱沟, and some book on traditional Chinese medicine also use 憨葱, all of them are not suitable based on the ancient books. There is also one place named 旱葱沟 in current 吉林省白山市浑江区, but the name has been changed to 旱沟村.
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-64
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 40-09
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 40-11
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 18-37
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 77-84
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-26
▲ 中国人民政治协商会议, 四川省什邡市委员会; 张宗法: 《三农经（整理本）》, 成都：巴蜀书社 , 2020.12, ISBN 978-7-5531-1433-0, p. 110
▲ 王锦秀，汤彦承，吴征镒: 《〈植物名实图考〉新释（上册）》, 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2021.12, ISBN 978-7-5478-5185-2/R·2225, p. 119
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 31-28
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 18-51
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 85-25
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 38-52
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 29-26
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 423
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 29-46
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 29-52
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 18-62
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 63-91
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 31-92
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 39-08
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 39-10
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 39-13
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 39-12
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 39-17
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 84-08
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 41-82
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 4536
▲ 書小史,四庫全書,卷六
▲ 北京市地方志编纂委员会办公室: 《志者心语——北京区县修志人物风采》, 北京: 北京联合出版公司, 2018.11, ISBN 978-7-5596-2429-1, p. 136
▲ 褚亚平; 《北京市》编纂委员会: 《中华人民共和国地理词典 北京市》, 北京: 商务印书馆, 1991.4, ISBN 7-100-00953-7/K·161, p. 266
▲ 郦道元; 华辰: 《水经注·中》 (《历代科学与思想学术文献》), 呼和浩特: 远方出版社, 2007.6, ISBN 978-7-80723-230-8, p. 204
▲ 曹子西, 于德源: 《秦汉魏晋十六国北朝时期蓟城资料》 (《北京史研究资料丛书》), 北京: 紫禁城出版社, 1986.4, 书号: 11314·052, p. 354
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 32-07
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 41-48
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 35-24
▲ 大众点评
▲ 大众点评
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 40-24
▲ 陈荣岚, 李熙泰: 《厦门方言》 (《厦门文化丛书》), 厦门: 鹭江出版社, 1994.1, ISBN 7-80533-964-3/G·379, p. 110
▲ 张侃: 《互补联动》 (孔永松: 《厦门与台湾丛书》), 福州: 海风出版社, 2004.7, ISBN 7-80597-484-5/G·96, p. 266
▲ 孙泉成: 《厦门市政公用事业大观》, 厦门: 厦门市公用事业管理局, 1995.10, p. 193
▲ 厦门市地方志编纂委员会办公室: 《厦门志 清·道光十九年镌》 (《福建省地方志丛刊》), 厦门: 鹭江出版社, 1996.3, ISBN 7-80610-067-9/K·5, p. 57
▲ 顾海: 《厦门港》 (《福建海港史话》), 福州: 福建人民出版社, 2001.8, ISBN 7-211-03818-7/F·208, p. 69
▲ 厦门市房地产志编纂委员会: 《厦门市房地产志》, 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 1988.11, ISBN 7-5615-0135-8/K·13, p. 20
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 85-89
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 29-23
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 42-16
▲ 孙小岛: 《天津“黑棋队”内幕》//中国人民政治协商会议天津市委员会文史资料研究委员会: 《天津文史资料选辑 1994·4（总第六十四辑）》, 天津: 天津人民出版社, 1994.11, ISBN 7-201-02140-9/G·991, p. 174
The following materials show why the places are called as the names.
▲ 刘向春: 《月牙河》//天津市东郊区政协文史资料研究委员会: 《天津东郊文史 第1輯》, 内部发行, 1988.12, pp. 94-95
▲ 朱翰元: 《靶挡村与靶挡村小学的由来》//政协天津市河东区委员会文史资料征集工作委员会: 《天津市河东区文史资料 （第五輯）》, 内部发行, 1992.11, pp. 117-118
▲ 中老年时报编辑部; 赵兵: 《中老年时报创刊30周年系列丛书 岁月漫记》, p. 226
▲ 中国国家地名信息库
Could we have more evidence?
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 315
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 76-44
▲ GB 18030—2020/Amd.1 Draft 1
▲ 个人所得税app used in Chinese mainland
▲ 陈从周: 《古建之美》, 南京: 江苏凤凰文艺出版社, 2023.4, ISBN 978-7-5594-7036-2, pp. 220-221, 223
In Evidence 2, 陶然亭 is located in Xicheng District, Beijing City (formerly Xuanwu District), but 兰亭 there is copied the real 兰亭 which is located in 浙江省绍兴市柯桥区兰亭村.
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 82-64
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 81-79
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 83-51
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 85-48
▲ 《列朝诗集·丙集第五》
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 326
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 《古壮字字典》, pp. 404-405
The Zhuang reading of U+316B9 𱚹 is sux*. For the standard reading, the tone mark -x/-ч corresponds to 阳上 (John said this reading is used in Longzhou Zhuang), but the tone of 昼 should be 阴去 (-q/-ƽ). On the other hand, the middle Chinese finals (韵母) of 手 and 昼 are the same, and one 老借 reading of 手 I collected is suj; that 知母 reads as [s-]/[θ-] is very common. For common 腔词结合 rule in Cantonese Yueju Opera, Cantonese Yuequ Show and Cantonese pop songs, 阳上 (Tone 5) and 阴去 (Tone 3) could mean to the same musical scale, such as 上 (Gongche) for 平喉.
The semantic rationale of U+316B9 𱚹 in Zhuang and Tày is still NOT obvious. If it is the way like 臼 and 旧, 幺 and 么 to distinguish the meanings, the submitted glyph is acceptable; if we can not confirm this, it is better to change the glyph to match the evidence.
▲ 梁启超: 《梁启超全集 第九册》 (《传世藏书系列》), 北京: 北京出版社, 1999.7, ISBN 7-200-03703-6/I·573, p. 5240
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 155
The glyph on the evidence looked like U+6A3A 樺 K0-7B7C.
There is only one case related to KC-10030 in 국사편찬위원회.
But, there are 8 cases related to 白樺皮.
[Note from Eiso]
I can’t find more evidence for this character. Maybe ROK needs to find more to prove it isn’t the a one-off case?
清乾隆四十九年/朝鲜正祖八年/日本天明四年/后黎景興四十五年/阮泰德七年/甲辰龍年冬月初二 means 1784-12-13.
We need to understand what this character mean, and then to confirm if it is suitable to unify it with U+27E15 𧸕.
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 《汉字海》, p. 472
▲ 王嚞 (王重陽): 《太公陰符經》, 重刊道藏輯要, folio 38B
The evidence shows the sentences should be a poem “二十韻排律”. I show some parts and the corresponding 平仄 as below.
隙月腰間渾意氣 仄仄平平平仄仄
團花身上不參差 平平平仄仄平平
拘原武力來生面 平平仄仄平平仄
敵愾雄圖聳赤～ 仄仄平平仄仄平
功烈爭稱曾戰鬪 平仄平平平仄仄
丹靑莫狀舊容姿 平平仄仄仄平平
The submitted character is a 韻脚, and the previous one 差 is 차 (Mand: cī, Cant: ci1), the next one 姿 is 자 (Mand: zī, Cant: zi1), so the final (중성+종성) must be ㅏ. 頿 also reads as 자, and the meaning matches the poem.
I suggest ROK withdraw this character.
The evidence looks more like ⿰氵宷.
It looks a very important geographical term in Korean. We should take it more carefully.
The evidence shows one geographic name used in the Korean Peninsula, ～洞. However, 嗭洞 could be found in 국사편찬위원회.
Are there any more evidences for this character to prove it is not a one-off case?
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 46-14
▲ 吴玉贵, 华飞: 《四库全书精品文存 23》, 北京: 团结出版社, 1997.6, ISBN 7-80130-086-6, p. 28
▲ 张华: 《博物志（外四种）》 (《中国古典小说丛书》), 北京: 华文出版社, 2018.1, ISBN 978-7-5075-4770-2, p. 33
▲ 刘坤, 赵宗乙; 金玲, 孟庆祥: 《中国古代民俗（二）——梦粱录（外四种）》 (《经典名著解读》), 哈尔滨: 黑龙江人民出版社, 2006.1, ISBN 7-207-05493-9/G·1198, p. 449
▲ 關長龍《敦煌本數術文獻輯校》（中华书局2019）P1380
▲ 陳尚君《全唐文補編》（中华书局2005）P1262
▲ 曾良.陳敏·明清小說俗字典（廣陵書社2017）P758
▲ 李登: 《重刊詳校篇海》, 燕京藏萬曆刻本, 卷之五
▲ 張有: 《復古編》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷五
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 147
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第三
▲ 《古壮字字典》, pp. 29-30
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 袁义达《中国姓氏大辞典》P1444
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 81-73
▲ 蒲松龄; 蒲松龄纪念馆: 《聊斋杂著》, 济南: 齐鲁书社, 2020.1, ISBN 978-7-5333-4245-6, p. 148
▲ 蒲松龄; 李国庆: 《杂字 俗读》 (《古代幼学启蒙经典6》), 济南: 齐鲁书社, 1998.12, ISBN 7-5333-0669-4/I·217, p. 91
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之二
The radical shows 雨.
▲ 《國朝畫徵錄卷中》
▲ 《龍龕手鑑》, 早稻田大學藏本, 卷第一
博茂村 -> 海滨街道博茂社区
老鵶埇村 -> 大山江街道山基华社区老鸦埇村
⿺九由金村 -> 覃巴镇竹山村旭金村
楊梅村 -> 浅水镇杨梅村
碌晒村 -> 王村港镇碌西村
王村 -> 王村港镇王村港村
The evidence shows the place 王村 is near to the border of 茂名, which means current 茂名市电白区沙院镇 (formerly under 茂港区). See the following.
起=杨梅村, 途经1=博茂社区, 途经2=老鸦埇村, 途经3=旭金村, 途经4=碌西村, 途经5=王村港村, 终=沙院镇
That means it is the variant of 旭. The local people in 覃巴, 王村港 and 沙院 speak Leizhou dialects (under Chinese Min-nan dialects), but some geographic names look not like the common Han names (汉名).
U+24C19 𤰙 is a dialectal ideograph used for Chinese Mandarin dialects with 𤰚 as 𤰙𤰚 which is similar to 旮旯. U+24C19 𤰙 and the submitted characters can’t be unifiable based on both of the submitted evidence and the new evidence.
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 《備急千金要方》, 江户醫學影北宋本
The variant of 蕤.
▲ 潘自牧: 《記纂淵海》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷七十八, folio 73B
▲ 杜臺卿: 《玉燭寶典》, 古逸叢書景日本鈔卷子本, 卷第三, folio 9B
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十八
▲ 大原望: 《和製漢字の辞典》, 2014
▲ 蘇軾: 《王宗稷撰年譜》 (《東坡全集》), 文淵閣四庫全書本, 卷一百九, folio 11B
The variant of 祐. （北宋）元祐元年十二月二十四日 means 1087/1/31 丙寅 (JD-12:00:00 is 2118115). 苏轼 1037年—1101年, aka 北宋景祐四年丁丑—北宋建中靖国元年辛巳.
▲ 《小校經閣金石文字引得》, 大通書局, 1979
▲ 鍾敬文: 《驕縱的婦人》//《語絲》, 1925.8.10, 39號, p. 162
▲ 钟敬文: 《骄纵的妇人》//李春林: 《语丝选粹》 (龙河, 闻琨, 前方: 《中国现代名刊文摘》), 沈阳: 辽宁大学出版社, 2001.1, ISBN 7-5610-3509-8, p. 416
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第四
▲ 《篆隸萬象名義》, 高山寺藏本, 卷第廿九
The variant of 詝. The above evidence shows the fanqie reading is 竹与反.
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之五
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 日藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第三
▲ 《中央民衆訓練部公報》, 1936, Num.10, p. 30
▲ 張栻: 《南軒集》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷十八, folio 6B
This article is 《黄鶴樓説》. This character is related to one personal name, but there are different version of the name in history like 閻伯珵, 閻伯理, 閻伯瑾 and this one.
▲ 俞汝捷, 余启新: 《黄鹤楼与名人》 (《中国名胜与名人丛书》), 北京: 旅游教育出版社, 1997.10, ISBN 7-5637-0729-8, p. 215
▲ 鄺露: 《嶠雅》, 清海雪堂刻本, 卷二
The variant of 賓.
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第五
▲ 《説文解字》, 陳昌治刻本, 第三卷
▲ 《説文解字》, 續古逸叢書, 第三上
▲ 《説文解字注箋》, 甲寅京師補刊本, 弟三上
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 189
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 72
▲ 中國第一歷史檔案館, 澳門基金會, 暨南大學古籍研究所: 《明清時期澳門問題檔案文獻匯編（一）》, 北京: 人民出版社, 1999.12， ISBN 9787010030692, pp. 392-393
▲ 《汉语大字典（第二版）》, p. 3268
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 范中义, 顿贺: 《明代海船图说》, 济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 2020.1, ISBN 978-7-5331-9965-4, p. 187
The following books use 舟远 as two characters.
▲ 《中国造船发展簡史》//中国造船工程学会; 翁竹书, 钟思, 卞燮昌, 王淮, 孙昌民: 《中国造船工程学会1962年年会論文集 第二分册 运輸船舶》, 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1964.10, 統一书号 N15034.783, p. 15
▲ 杨宗英, 黄根余: 《浅论郑和宝船——从史料和考古角度分析》//纪念伟大航海家郑和下西洋580周年筹备委员会, 中国航海史研究会: 《郑和下西洋论文集 第一集》, 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1985.6, 书号 11044·10002, p. 159
The following books use other characters, but it looks unreasonable. I just list them here.
▲ 蔣維錟, 鄭麗航: 《媽祖文獻史料彙編（第一辑） 散文卷》, 北京: 中國檔案出版社, 2007.10, ISBN 978-7-80166-895-0, p. 25
It uses U+4483 䒃, and shows why they change the character.
▲ 蔡国耀: 《开台妈祖——莆仙与台湾关系史》, 福州: 海风出版社, 2013.5, ISBN 978-7-5512-0101-8, p. 379
It also uses U+4483 䒃.
▲ 广东海上丝绸之路博物馆: 《阳江木船传统建造技术与风俗》, 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2018.12, ISBN 978-7-5359-7026-8, p. 118
It uses ⿰舟参 which should be unified to U+26A53 𦩓. ⿰舟參 is also not encoded.
Both of the previous three ones are not the characters in URO, that means the authors or editors have some comments on the corresponding words. The books all mentioned 福州 (even current 闽侯县 or 闽侯经济技术开发区), but we have no materials to prove it is the word used in Chinese Min-dong dialects.
《媽祖文獻史料彙編（第一辑） 散文卷》 mentioned the character should be modified to 䒃, and the editors mentioned the ancient book. The following books show the modern studies on 䒃 and its variant 艁. It is very clear that 艁 in 揚雄《方言》 means 浮桥 (pontoon bridge?), not the wood at the bottom of one boat (船之底木). So, it is not better to change the character to 艁 or 䒃.
▲ 殷寄明: 《〈说文解字〉精读》 (《原典精读系列》), 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2007.4, ISBN 978-7-309-04816-2/I·341, p. 169
This one mentioned 艁 is the variant of U+3035F 𰍟.
▲ 華學誠: 《〈方言〉及其注本三論》 (《揚雄研究系列叢書》), 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2018.3, ISBN 978-7-5531-0947-3, p. 140
▲ 熊铁基: 《熊铁基文集 第五卷 秦汉军事制度史（附未刊稿）》, 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社, 2021.12, ISBN 978-7-5622-9467-2, p. 197
Also see WS2024-01974.
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 84-17
▲ GB/T 7589—1987
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 26-94
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 86-10
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 30-15
▲ 郁賢皓: 《李白選集》 (《中國古典文學名家選集叢書》), 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2013.12, ISBN 978-7-5325-7126-0/I·2782, p. 686
▲ 郁賢皓: 《李白選集》 (《中國古典文學名家選集叢書》), 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2013.12, ISBN 978-7-5325-7126-0/I·2782, p. 687
The simiplified form ⿰豸国.
▲ 李白; 王琦; 杨用成: 《李白全集 1》, 珠海: 珠海出版社, 1996.11, ISBN 7-80607-208-X/I·143, p. 57
▲ 李白; 王琦; 杨用成: 《李白全集 1》, 珠海: 珠海出版社, 1996.11, ISBN 7-80607-208-X/I·143, p. 58
▲ GB/T 7589—1987
▲ GB/T 7589—1987
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 240
▲ 李绍飞: 《“杂家”话杂（上册）》, 昆明: 云南出版集团公司云南美术出版社, 2009.7, ISBN 978-7-80695-884-1, p. 38
▲ 齐豫生, 夏于全: 《中国古典文学宝库 第六十八辑 逸闻轶事小说》, 延吉: 延边人民出版社, 1999.8, ISBN 7-80648-284-9/I·82, p. 224
▲ 孟元老; 姜汉椿: 《东京梦华录全译》 (《中国历代名著全译丛书》), 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 2022.3, ISBN 978-7-221-16975-4, p. 167 & 169
▲ 《毛泽东读书集成 第63卷》, p. 45243
▲ 翁俊雄: 《唐初政区与人口》, 北京: 北京师范学院出版社, 1990.8, ISBN 7-81014-457-X/K·8, p. 163
▲ 刘纬毅: 《山西历史地理词典》, 太原: 山西古籍出版社, 2004.2, ISBN 7-80598-568-5/K·177, p. 230
▲ 《中央民衆訓練部公報》, 1936, Num.10, p. 30
▲ พจนานุกรม จีน-ไทย, ISBN 974-246-623-8, p. 89
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 76-15
▲ 张穆; 安介生: 《〈魏延昌地形志〉存稿辑校》, 济南: 齐鲁书社, 2011.6, ISBN 978-7-5333-2507-7, p. 299
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 70-35
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 65-06
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 213
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 37-84
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 27-05
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 60-58
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 62-36
▲ 袁义达《中国姓氏大辞典》P471
The evidence shows the glyph is U+31637 𱘷. We need more evidences.
[WS2021-01433]
▲ 稗編,四庫全書,卷八十一
▲ 陳開沚: 《裨農最要》, 光緒刻本, 目録
The variant of 紮.
▲ 朱雲; 李根: 《廣金石韻府》, 明崇禎蓮庵刻朱墨套印本, 卷之一, 上平聲, 一東
▲ 朱雲; 李根: 《金石韻府》, 明崇禎朱墨套印本, 卷之一, 上平聲, 一東
▲ 《汉语大字典（第二版）》, p. 2253
▲ 《重刊詳校篇海》, 燕京藏順治刻本, 五卷後册
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 25
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 429
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 212
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 140
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之二
▲ 《古壮字字典》, pp. 39-40
▲ 阮秉: 《五千字譯國語》, 附次補遺
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 八卷
▲ KCHNMH, p. 316
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 46
▲ 汤志彪: 《三晋文字编 卷七》, 北京: 作家出版社, 2013.10, ISBN 978-7-5063-7133-9, p. 506
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 39
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 41 comments.
▲ 《壮汉英词典》, p. 569
The component 门 is often used to the meanings of colours, that means the semantic element is 门 (related to colour) and the phonetic element is 金 (currently 老借 is gim, but I trust gyaem is more ancient form). Therefore, there is no need to change anything.
See below.
The semantic element is 食/飠 (<養, bottom), and the phonetic element is 丈 (老借 form is ciengh, 新借 form is cang).
If yes, the IDS should be updated correspondingly, but the SC and TS should be kept.
U+21641 𡙁 is the unifiable variant of U+723D 爽 per UCV #108, but there is no K-Source reference for U+21641 𡙁 now.
It is better to use ⿱爽田 to match ROK conventions. The Korean reading provided by the submitter is 상, which is the same as 爽.
There is no K-Source under 戬, but K1-6B79 is under 戩.
The K-Source for U+9ED8 默 is K0-5979, but U+9ED9 黙 is K6-1021.
Suggest normalizing the K glyph to ⿱艹默.
There is no K-Source glyph under U+79C3 秃.
The new evidence on Comment #9875, the right part of this character follows 戹 like 阸, 𩚬, 㧖, 呝.
Does TCA plan to normalize the glyph if possible?
See U+8794 螔, U+892B 褫, U+8B15 謕, U+29E9B 𩺛 and so on.
The reading of the submitted character is nhăn. There is no Vietnamese usage for 㚥 currently, that means there is also no Vietnamese reading for it. The phonetic element of 㚥 is 于, which reads vo, vu, vò and so on in Vietnamese and no consonant coda in the syllable when it is used as the phonetic element.
The evidence shows the reading of the right part is diện, which must be 面.
There is no V-source reference under U+79C3 秃 now.
There are no V-Source reference for U+6E7C 湼 and U+23D40 𣵀.
Vietnam could do the normalization for this case, so I think the current glyph is acceptable.
Editorial
Showing 28 comments.
[WS2021-00762]
[ {{WS2017-03140}} ]
[WS2021-01439]
It is better to keep them separately.
[ {{WS2017-04430}} ]
Other
Showing 64 comments.
But, the current draft of the new version of GB/T 22321.1 shows the glyph like the code chart.
It is better to encode them separately to make everyone more easily.
▲ p. 7 of IRG N2119
▲ p. 2 of IRG N2747
If China’s request to change the G glyph for U+2CD98 𬶘 back to the previous one, this character should be withdrawn by China in future.
▲ 吴澄: 《禮記纂言》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷二十五, folio 2A
The handwritten calligraphy work of Dr. Sun Yat-sen is shown below.
The current RS and TS matches KC-06763 ⿱艹装.
GB 18030—2022 also matches KC-06763 ⿱艹装.
It looks it is better to disunify SAT-03743 ⿱艹裝 to a new code point as UNC, RS=145.11, TS=17, FS=2. We also need to check if there are other similar issues.
If we can’t clarify the right part, it is better to keep current radical without more radicals.
KC-07234.
They are variants.
VN-F17B2 could be unified here in future.
This character is also the variant of U+9867 顧.
[WS2021-00651]
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第一
⿰土蒦 is also KC-10600.
Data for Unihan
Showing 119 comments.
WS2021-03422:GDM-00317 ⿱艹𱶌
[WS2021-03422]
The pair 際 vs 际 is listed in Table 1, so they are not the T/S pair.
The pair 際 vs 际 is listed in Table 1, so they are not the T/S pair.
U+24FAE 𤾮
U+24FAE 𤾮
The current kVietnamese property value is also cũ (semantic element is 屢).
[WS2021-01904]
[WS2021-04717]
[WS2021-04398]
[WS2021-04761]
The current kVietnamese property value is lâu (semantic element is 舊), and the Vietnamese reading for the submitted character is cũ (semantic element is 屢).
As UCV #298j shows, the G form should be ⿰月对. If this character been included in the future version of GB 18030, the glyph should be ⿰月对.
⿰氵藺 has not been encoded, but ROK could submit it as KC-01337 or KC-02206 in future.
The 老借 of 立 in Zhuang is laeb.
The evidence shows 奴攺, but this 攺 is the variant of 改.
not 巳幼
kCantonese jyun5