Similar but not unfied to 𢿽 (U+22FFD) and U+22FE6 𢿦 because of non-cognates.
The top component is the phonetic element which is derived from 敝. The 新借 reading of 敝 is bi, but other characters with the 敝 phonetic element read similar to be. Note: The tone -z in 新借 is related to ancient 入声, this situation is also the same in Theater Mandarin of Naning Yongju Opera.
憋 bez
蹩 bez
鳖 bez
撇 bez
瞥 bez
The original evidence of 𰀬 (GHZR-10061.01) shows it reads as 盈. This Zhuang character is also related to the Cantonese word noi6 (we often write it as 耐).
Unify to 兮 or 𠔃 based on Evidence 2 and the first piece of evidence in Comment #228?
The following pictures show this character is the variant of 兮.
▲ 《聚學軒叢書 第四集 隋唐石刻拾遺 上》, 揚州: 江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社, 1982.10, p. 29
▲ 黄永年: 《古代文献研究集林 第二集》, 西安: 陕西师范大学出版社, 1992.2, ISBN 7-5613-0401-3/K·32, p. 282
The first piece of evidence in Comment #228 show it is the variant of 𠔃.
The second piece of evidence in Comment #228 show the fanqie is 胡雞反.
For 𱎚 (U+3139A), we have two sources for it. The first one is the evidence for WS2017-00092 which is the character used for Tày and the meaning is related to the Vietnamese word “người” (𠊛). The second one is for KC-04796 (KA-KC04796 in ExtF1 as 00225). The evidence shows below.
▲ 韓國經學資料集成 83冊 ｢詩經講義續集｣ (The evidence is provided by Dr. Cho)
It is very clear that it is the variant of 仁 not 人. It is better to treat them as the non-cognates under the modern uses.
As Comment #768 shows, this character is used in Chairman Mao’s books, so it is necessary to use the original form in the digital text.
Unify to 挲 (U+6332)? The evidence shows the Vietnamese word “ma sa”, that means 摩挲. There is no V-Source under U+6332 挲, maybe it is OK to do the horizontal extension to U+6332 挲 if IRG agrees, or add it to IVD in future.
Both are the vulgar term for sexual intercourse, and the readings are both địt. Based on the current evidence, the phonetic element is 迭, and the semantic element is 气.
We can consider using this V glyph and RS, TS, IDS for U+28540 𨕀, but keep V2-7A3B as the V-Source reference if unified.
The modern edition as below replaces this character as 湾, but it doesn’t mean it is the variant of 湾. 順鄉都 is not still used as the geographical names in 信宜. There is also Hakka people (客家人) in 信宜, and it is not easy to confirm if it is the character used for Chinese Yue-dialect or Chinese Hakka-dialect, so there is no the language tag at this step.
▲ 信宜县地方志编纂委员会: 《信宜县志》 (《广东省地方志丛书》), 广州: 广东人民出版社, 1993.12, ISBN 7-218-01230-0/K·270, p. 88
Current name is 定芘屯 (广西壮族自治区崇左市扶绥县), reads as Mbanjdingbiz based on National Database for Geographical Names of China. Note: the database mentioned “ding” means 山塘, but there are no the corresponding meanings for the Zhuang words “ding”, and the 新借 reading of the Hanzi 定 is “ding” (老借 reading is “dingh”); the similar situation for “biz”, but the 新借 and 老借 readings for “芘” and “蓖” are not “biz”.
The Zhuang reading of U+316B9 𱚹 is sux*. For the standard reading, the tone mark -x/-ч corresponds to 阳上 (John said this reading is used in Longzhou Zhuang), but the tone of 昼 should be 阴去 (-q/-ƽ). On the other hand, the middle Chinese finals (韵母) of 手 and 昼 are the same, and one 老借 reading of 手 I collected is suj; that 知母 reads as [s-]/[θ-] is very common. For common 腔词结合 rule in Cantonese Yueju Opera, Cantonese Yuequ Show and Cantonese pop songs, 阳上 (Tone 5) and 阴去 (Tone 3) could mean to the same musical scale, such as 上 (Gongche) for 平喉.
The semantic rationale of U+316B9 𱚹 in Zhuang and Tày is still NOT obvious. If it is the way like 臼 and 旧, 幺 and 么 to distinguish the meanings, the submitted glyph is acceptable; if we can not confirm this, it is better to change the glyph to match the evidence.
The evidence shows “按遼薊三千餘里，冠蓋所往來，舟車所要衝。統浿～四十二州，川蜀之殷富，蘇杭之佳麗。” 遼薊 means 遼地 (current 辽宁) and 薊地 (current 河北, 北京, 天津), 川蜀 means current 四川 and 重庆, 蘇杭 means 蘇州 (苏州) and 杭州, so 浿～ must be one or two places. 《舊唐書·卷三十九·志第十九》 shows “高麗本五部，一百七十六城，户六十九萬七千。其年十二月，分高麗地為九都督府，四十二州，一百縣，置安東都護府於平壤城以統之。” The year (其年) means 總章元年 (aka 668 A.D.), so that 四十二州 means Koryo (高麗/고려). 浿水 means current Taedong River in current Phyeongyang and other cities and provinces of DPRK/North Korea, so ～ may be the other river in Koryo, but I can’t find which one is.
It looks a very important geographical term in Korean. We should take it more carefully.
Evidence
Thanks for Huang Junliang’s help, the river should be 薩水 in the Chinese ancient books, which is current Ch'ongch'on River (淸川江/청천강) in DPRK/North Korea. 《北史·列傳·卷七十九》 shows “東濟薩水，去平壤城三十里”. 《朝鮮王朝實錄》 shows “平安道有急, 則將長山串以西兵船, 載於阿郞浦, 則平壤 浿江、安州 薩水漕可通也。” 安州 is under Phyeongannamto (平安南道/평안남도) now.
The modern edition uses 坑 as below.
▲ 萧良幹; 张元忭, 孙𰽚; 李能成; 绍兴市委党史研究室, 绍兴市地方志办公室: 《万历〈绍兴府志〉点校本》 (《绍兴史志文化丛书 第二辑》), 宁波: 宁波出版社, 2012.7, ISBN 978-7-5526-0329-3, p. 179
The text of this poem shows below.
遊懷川 譚處端
雲耕寶陸三千里 [平平仄仄平平仄]
月破黄昏十萬家 [仄仄平平仄仄平/韻]
清夜碧潭澄皎潔 [平仄仄平平仄仄]
蚌吞銀～産胎砂 [仄平平仄仄平平/韻]
It is very easy to know the tone of this character must be 仄 not 平.
Other version shows 焰, which matches 仄.
▲ 顧嗣立: 《元詩選》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 二集, 卷二十五, folio 3A
▲ 汪森; 黄振中, 吴中任, 梁超然: 《粤西叢載校註（中册）》, 南寧: 廣西民族出版社, 2007.12, ISBN 978-7-5363-5426-5/Z·614, p. 738
The submitted glyph form matches this evidence of the modern publication.
The evidence shown on Comment #5726 means U+8029 耩, not the submitted character. The left part is the same as the left part of 耕 which is also shown on the picture.
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
New evidence
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 615
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 615
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 615
Evidence 1 shows ⿰火⿸𠂆㇯𧘇丿, Evidence 2 shows ⿰火⿸𠂆氏. The semantic rationales showed on the evidences support the normalization.
Evidence 1 shows the left part is 火 (hoả), the right part is half of 派 (phái). [从火派省聲]
Evidence 2 shows the left part is 火 (hoả), the right part is 𠂢 (phái). [从火𠂢省聲]
For the new evidence under Comment #565. Other book uses 稷竹.
▲ 怀集县政协文史资料委员会 下帅壮族瑶族乡人民政府. 怀集文史 第13辑 下帅民族史料专辑. 1996, p. 1
Evidence
For the pieces of evidence in Comments #565 and #743, the local villagers have confirmed the name mentioned in Comment #743 is incorrect, and the current name is 尉竹, which is under 竹六. The villagers speak Zhuang language.
▲ L.m. Trần Văn Kiệm. Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt. Đà Nẵng, 2004, p. 535
The above page shows several characters related to the top component 䄪, all of them should be unified to 𥝢 as the top component, such as...
U+68C3 棃 vs ⿱䄪木
U+7282 犂 vs ⿱䄪牛
U+9ECE 黎 V1-6D2E vs ⿱䄪𱥯
U+74C8 瓈 vs ⿰王⿱䄪𱥯
U+853E 蔾 vs ⿳艹䄪木
However, there is only U+9ECE 黎 has the V-Source reference and the top component shows 𥝢 not 䄪.
Maybe we need to make something.
Solution 1:
Modify the glyph and IDS for this character to ⿰石棃.
Do the V-Source horizontal extensions for U+68C3 棃, U+7282 犂, U+74C8 瓈, U+853E 蔾 like 黎 in future.
Solution 2:
Change V1-6D2E glyph for U+9ECE 黎 to ⿱䄪𱥯.
Treat ⿱䄪X as Vietnam/VNPF convention.
Do the V-Source horizontal extensions for U+68C3 棃, U+7282 犂, U+74C8 瓈, U+853E 蔾 as ⿱䄪木, ⿱䄪牛, ⿰王⿱䄪𱥯, ⿳艹䄪木 in future.
Change IDS for this character to ⿰石棃, but keep the glyph.
If we decide to unify this one to U+2CD98 𬶘, and update the G glyph. I suggest using GCCPP-00035 for U+2CD98. The submitted evidence of GJZ-00265 shows it is a typo.
The article on the submitted evidence is cited from 王延寿’s 《王孙赋》. The alternative variant is 猜. 㺓 has been used in other versions of the ancient books, so it is OK to accept this one.
▲ 严可均: 《全后汉文 下》 (《国学基本经典》), 北京: 商务印书馆, 1999.10, ISBN 7-100-02934-1, p. 592
It looks it is better to disunify SAT-03743 ⿱艹裝 to a new code point as UNC, RS=145.11, TS=17, FS=2. We also need to check if there are other similar issues.
The submitted evidence shows “……膈脘之～憊，轉爲澎脹……”. “痞憊” is a stable word in ancient books on traditional medicine. The new evidence on Comment #6474 shows it is the variant of 𤵛 (U+24D5B), and 𤵛 is the variant of 痞.
Is it the 反切下字 (fanqie lower character) of 悶 (see Evidence 2)?
The kFanqie property value for 悶 is 莫困, and the evidences show the fanqie is 鄙～.
悶: 明母臻攝魂韻合口一等去聲 (被切字)
莫: 明母宕攝唐韻開口一等入聲 (反切上字)
困: 溪母臻攝魂韻合口一等去聲 (反切下字)
That means the fanqie matches the character 悶.
However, 鄙 is 幫母 and 三等, that means the reading of character 被切字 should be 齐齿呼. 幫母 and 明母 are not totally the same.
鄙: 幫母止攝脂韻開口三等上聲 (反切上字)
At least, the submitted character should be as below.
？母臻攝魂韻合口三等(?)去聲 (反切下字)
Comment
Andrew’s comment (#4214) is reasonable.
The kFanqie property value for 閟 is 兵媚.
閟: 幫母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (被切字)
兵: 幫母梗攝庚韻開口三等平聲 (反切上字)
媚: 明母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (反切下字)
And the usage of 鄙 is the same as 兵 as the shengmu (声母), that means the submitted character should be as below.
？母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲
On the other hand, 異 is shown as below. (羊吏切)
以母止攝之韻開口三等去聲
脂韻 and 之韻 are very close in middle Chinese, so we can guess the submitted character should be as below.
以母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (Putonghua reading: yì)
That means the unification request on Comment #8 is also acceptable.
The same as Z6-1 mentioned in IRG N2733R. All the pieces of submitted evidence and the new one in Comment #756 mean it is a CJK component. Support Ken’s Comment #936.
The same as Z2-6 mentioned in IRG N2733R, but it is the real Hanzi/Kanji. It is better to remove it from the CJK component. It will be a helpful one for IDS. We can add it to UCV with 工 as the components but encode this one separately.
IRG Working Set 2024v1.0
Source: Eiso CHAN
Date: Generated on 2026-08-19
Labels
Showing 3781 comments.
Unification
Showing 62 comments.
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 17-21
On the other hand, 㕣 (U+3563) could be also used as the variant of 公.
The readings are the same, gǒu.
Looks the variant of U+5CED 峭
This character is the variant of U+21DFF 𡷿.
U+2A9CE 𪧎 could be the variant of 定, based on the explanation of KC-11709.
Therefore, they are non-cognates.
𣲭口水 is the other name of 祁水 in Yongzhou, Hunan.
Unify to 𣶍 (U+23D8D) per UCV #363, but I don’t know if this UCV is useful.
The top component is the phonetic element which is derived from 敝. The 新借 reading of 敝 is bi, but other characters with the 敝 phonetic element read similar to be. Note: The tone -z in 新借 is related to ancient 入声, this situation is also the same in Theater Mandarin of Naning Yongju Opera.
憋 bez
蹩 bez
鳖 bez
撇 bez
瞥 bez
Unify to 𠽏 (U+20F4F)?
If yes, we could expand UCV #90.
Unify to 𰀬? UCV #428 久乆
The original evidence of 𰀬 (GHZR-10061.01) shows it reads as 盈. This Zhuang character is also related to the Cantonese word noi6 (we often write it as 耐).
Unified to 㴱 U+3D31 or 𣵫 U+23D6B?
Based on the evidence, it is also the variant of 深.
See WS2017-02033.
[ {{WS2017-02033}} ]
Unify to 兮 or 𠔃 based on Evidence 2 and the first piece of evidence in Comment #228?
The following pictures show this character is the variant of 兮.
▲ 《聚學軒叢書 第四集 隋唐石刻拾遺 上》, 揚州: 江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社, 1982.10, p. 29
▲ 黄永年: 《古代文献研究集林 第二集》, 西安: 陕西师范大学出版社, 1992.2, ISBN 7-5613-0401-3/K·32, p. 282
The first piece of evidence in Comment #228 show it is the variant of 𠔃.
The second piece of evidence in Comment #228 show the fanqie is 胡雞反.
Unify to 囧 (U+56E7)?
Same semantics and similar glyphs.
▲ 韓國經學資料集成 83冊 ｢詩經講義續集｣ (The evidence is provided by Dr. Cho)
It is very clear that it is the variant of 仁 not 人. It is better to treat them as the non-cognates under the modern uses.
As Comment #768 shows, this character is used in Chairman Mao’s books, so it is necessary to use the original form in the digital text.
Unify or normalize to 𪥎 (U+2A94E)?
They are both the variant of 奊, see here. If it is cited from the one-off evidence, it is better to use the encoded character directly.
Unify to 𤣪 or 玉?
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第一
▲ 《汉语大字典》, version 2, p. 1177
Unify to 𦅣 (U+26163)
See WS2021-01283
[WS2021-01283]
See WS2021-03225
Unify to 甿 (U+753F) and add 亾兦 to UCV #143.
Unified to 讟 (U+8B9F) in irg51.
See WS2017-04035
[ {{WS2017-04035}} ]
Unify to 呦
The evidence shows ⿰口㓜⿰口㓜鹿鸣, that is 呦呦鹿鸣. It is better to add 力 and 刀 as UCV lv.2.
Unify to 肊? No UCV rule for ⿹XY and ⿰YX or ⿹㇈Y and ⿰Y乙 now.
This character is the variant of 臆, and 肊 is also the variant of 臆.
Unified to 演 (U+6F14) or 𤀋 (U+2400B), add the UCV for the right components 寅~𡩟 (K is ⿱宀臾)~⿱宀㬰.
The evidence shows the fanqie is 延典.
Unify to 㱿 (U+3C7F)?
We need a new UCV for 𡉉 and 𠕓 like UCV #222a.
Unify to 趙 per UCV 423
Unify to 𦥓 (U+26953).
U+26953 𦥓 is the variant of 囟, see MJ045970.
▲ 廣漢和辭典, p. 332
▲ 大漢和辞典, p. 1046
Unify to 𰋮 (U+302EE) (𰋮)? No UCV rule for 𠦝 and 卓 now.
The original evidence of U+302EE (𰋮) shows it is the variant of 乾 cited from 《直音篇》.
Unify to 砭 (U+782D)
See WS2015-02828
Unify to 涤 as Comment #3121.
UCV #194 has been expanded at IRG #63, see Appendix B.18 of IRG N2703 Editorial Report for IRG Meeting #63.
The readings are the same, gǒu.
Unify to 𥹦 (U+25E66)?
cf. UCV #55
The radical of 䑆 is 130, the TE-725E glyph shows the radical is 74 clearly under TCA convention.
Unify to 𬜮 (U+2C72E).
See GB 18030—2022, 0x9932BD36
unify to 工?
The Japanese reading of this character is コウ, which is the same as 工.
㒱 reads as 몽, which is the variant of 夢, non-cognate.
人 and 入 are not the UCV rule now, but we can add them to UCV as Lv. 2.
Unify to 挲 (U+6332)? The evidence shows the Vietnamese word “ma sa”, that means 摩挲. There is no V-Source under U+6332 挲, maybe it is OK to do the horizontal extension to U+6332 挲 if IRG agrees, or add it to IVD in future.
Unify to WS2021-02721:VN-F1A6D per UCV #272.
Unify to 滗?
The evidence shows the variant is 潷 and the Putonghua/Mandarin reading is bì.
U+318FF 𱣿 reads as lác, this character reads as cách, non-cognates.
See WS2017-01736
[ {{WS2017-01736}} ]
consider unifying to 𨕀 (U+28540)
Both are the vulgar term for sexual intercourse, and the readings are both địt. Based on the current evidence, the phonetic element is 迭, and the semantic element is 气.
We can consider using this V glyph and RS, TS, IDS for U+28540 𨕀, but keep V2-7A3B as the V-Source reference if unified.
Attributes
Showing 103 comments.
The evidence shows 國輝, 國耀, 國尡, 國⿰光全, 國⿰光宗, 國𤾗, 國𠒗 are brothers, so it is better to use the unique RS. (⿰光全 is also not encoded.)
The Zhuang word “hoz” means “neck, throat”, that means the radical should be 130.
▲ Zhuang-Chinese-English Dictionary, p. 632
The Zhuang word “gen” means “arm”, so the radical should be 130.0.
▲ Zhuang-Chinese-English Dictionary, p. 477
Follow the radical of 个, the semantic element.
夊 is not included in the glyph
不 in the submitted IDS is U+F967
See the radical
⿱甫土 is not an encoded character, and there is no evidence to support it. U+25B89 𥮉 has been encoded, and the K-Source reference is K6-1118.
Agree with Conifer on Comment #2271. ROK could normalize the glyph.
It is also normalized the glyph to match IDS and Evidence 2 not 3.
Phonetic element is 卜, semantic element is 要
This character is used a very common Chinese Min nan word, 美 is the semantic element, 水 is the phonetic element.
The top part 丙 is the phonetic element.
Cf. U+5C1D 尝
IRGN945AR
句 (hook) is the semantic element.
Evidence
Showing 478 comments.
▲ 陈刚: 《北京方言词典》, 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985.9, 统一书号 9017·1335, p. 29
▲ 異體字字典
▲ 中国艺术研究院音乐研究所: 《李纯一全集（全6卷）》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2024.4, ISBN 978-7-5039-7469-4, 第2卷 《中国上古出土乐器综论·下》, p. 8
▲ 陈刚: 《北京方言词典》, 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985.9, 统一书号 9017·1335, p. 193
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 5491
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 43-12
▲ 罗常培: 《罗常培文集》 (《云南文库 大家文丛》), 昆明: 云南大学出版社, 2018.6, ISBN 978-7-5482-3071-7, p. 28
▲ 宋长宏: 《中国牛文化》, 北京: 民族出版社, 1997.4, ISBN 7-105-02751-7, p. 26
▲ 全国教育学院师专古汉语教学研究会: 《古代汉语 下册》, 太原: 山西人民出版社, 1986.5, 统一书号 9088·54, p. 397
▲ 叶明生: 《莆仙戏剧文化生态研究》 (陈世雄, 周宁, 郑尚宪: 《戏剧影视丛书》), 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2007.5, ISBN 978-7-5615-2760-3, pp. 393-397
▲ 林成彬, 朱宪章, 杨祖煌: 《民俗风物》 (甘玉连; 林金岱: 《莆田文化丛书》), 福州: 福建人民出版社, 2003.10, ISBN 7-211-04563-9/K·368, p. 94
▲ 叶明生: 《福建傀儡戏史论 上》 (《福建艺术丛书》), 北京: 中国戏剧出版社, 2004.11, ISBN 7-104-02003-9/J·860, p. 535
▲ 王馗: 《偶戏》 (《中国民俗文化丛书》), 北京：中国社会出版社, 2008.3, ISBN 978-7-5087-1939-9, p. 39
▲ 余炳炎; 郑安思: 《千年临水》, 福州: 海潮摄影艺术出版社, 2007.5, ISBN 978-7-80691-313-0/B·4, pp. 130-131
This character is used very widely in Putian-Xianyou Puxianxi Opera.
▲ 林瑞武: 《福建省民营剧团生存状态调查研究》 (《福建艺术丛书 第四辑》), 北京: 中国戏剧出版社, 2013.7, ISBN 978-7-104-04041-5, p. 94
▲ 蔡庆发, 王宝仁: 《文化概谈》 (《莆田文化丛书》), 福州: 福建人民出版社, 2003.10, ISBN 7-211-04563-9/K·368, p. 148
▲ 程德鲁: 《涵江城隍庙史略》//莆田市政协学习宣传文史资料委员会: 《莆田市文史资料 第34辑》, 莆田: 莆田市政协学习宣传文史资料委员会, 2018.1, （莆）新出内书2018002号, p. 274
▲ 福建省炎黄文化研究会, 中共福州市委宣传部: 《闽都文化研究》 (《八闽文化研究丛书》), 福州: 海峡文艺出版社, 2006.12, ISBN 7-80719-076-0/I·060, p. 511
▲ 王晓珊: 《闽剧传统剧目考论》 (《福建艺术丛书第四辑》), 北京: 中国戏剧出版社, 2013.7, ISBN 978-7-104-04041-5, p. 172
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 56-35
▲ 张溥; 吴汝纶: 《汉魏六朝百三家集选》 (《中华传世文选》), 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 1998.10, ISBN 7-206-03015-7, pp. 512-513
[⿰属鸟 on this evidence has not been encoded and submitted.]
▲ 陈瑞: 《北流民居风范》, 南宁: 广西人民出版社, 2016.1, ISBN 978-7-219-09797-7, p. 180
▲ 白马桥～店 in Fuzhou City
The product of this shop is shown as below.
▲ 江萍～店(斗池路店) in Fuzhou City
There is also one famous shop in Fuzhou City, which is 常乐米行.
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-17
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-21
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-30
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-32
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 34-50
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-73
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-56
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 38-65
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 34-53
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-81
▲ 《光緒信宜縣志》, 清光緒刻本, 卷一, 輿地志九, folio 1A
The modern edition as below replaces this character as 湾, but it doesn’t mean it is the variant of 湾. 順鄉都 is not still used as the geographical names in 信宜. There is also Hakka people (客家人) in 信宜, and it is not easy to confirm if it is the character used for Chinese Yue-dialect or Chinese Hakka-dialect, so there is no the language tag at this step.
▲ 信宜县地方志编纂委员会: 《信宜县志》 (《广东省地方志丛书》), 广州: 广东人民出版社, 1993.12, ISBN 7-218-01230-0/K·270, p. 88
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-58
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 25-69
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-85
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-66
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-89
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 17-84
▲ 《“教育部”“本土語言”成果參考字表總表》 in Taiwan Province
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 25-34
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 25-49
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 4092
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 25-61
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 25-94
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-12
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-15
▲ 大原望: 『和製漢字の辞典』
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-17
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-23
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 19-06
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 19-10
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 19-05
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 19-20
▲ 《汉字海》, p. 315
Not totally the same, but unifiable.
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 19-54
▲ 梅鼎祚: 《西晋文紀》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷八
The variant of 坰
▲ 左宗棠: 《左文襄公奏疏》, 清刻本, 左恪靖侯奏稿初編卷二十一
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 19-77
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 19-94
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-43
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-37
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-26
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-60
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-38
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-20
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-85
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-07
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-09
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-78
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-73
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 119
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-81
▲ 陳夢根: 《徐仙翰藻》, 卷之三, 卿二, 《靈濟宫賦》
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-83
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-63
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-14
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-73
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-57
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 20-66
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-50
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之四
This one has been included in CNS 11643.
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-80
▲ 《明神宗顯皇帝實録》, 梁鴻志影本, 卷之五百二十七, folio 6B
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-34
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-91
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-78
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-23
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-29
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-31
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-27
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-25
▲ 邱云章, 姚谦: 《垦牧记事》//中国人民政治协商会议南通市崇川区委员会《崇川文史》编委会: 《崇川文史 第一辑》, 南通: 如皋印刷厂, 1992.10, 苏通城出准字92029号, p. 43
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-86
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-89
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-88
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-24
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-16
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-03
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-02
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-10
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-29
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-28
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-42
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-44
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 23-49
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-66
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-79
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 30-94
▲ 律西: 《含犀霏玉軒筆記》//《紅雜志》, 1922, V.1, Num.19, p. 18
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-52
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-65
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-63
转生成为了只有乙女游戏破灭Flag的邪恶大小姐 第二季 Chinese version
转生成为了只有乙女游戏破灭Flag的邪恶大小姐 第二季 Chinese version
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 26-72
▲ 王静爱, 小长谷有纪, 色音: 《地理环境与民俗文化遗产——“自然环境与民俗地理学”中日国际学术研讨会论文集》, 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2009.1, ISBN 978-7-80247-263-1/K·008, p. 24
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 37-86
▲ 彭定求: 《全唐诗 ⑨》, 延吉: 延边人民出版社, 2004.1, ISBN 7-80648-128-1, p. 3149
裴潾《前相国赞皇公早葺平泉山居，暂还憩，旋起赴诏命作镇浙右，辄抒怀赋四言诗十四首奉寄之七》
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十四
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-04
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-39
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-24
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-12
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-66
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-48
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-53
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-69
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-56
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典2014
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十四
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-80
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 25-07
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-87
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-88
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-79
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-92
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-12
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-15
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-25
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-36
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-37
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-27
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-29
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-32
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-49
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-52
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-53
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 34-73
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 416
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 25-04
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-92
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 34-02
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 33-89
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 34-78
▲ 曹小云, 曹嫄: 《历代方志方言文献集成 第7册》, 北京: 中华书局, 2021.2, p. 4871
(copied from WS2024-02057)
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 35-83
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 29-80
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 30-49
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 30-78
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 30-76
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-56
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-74
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-83
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-85
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 38-21
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 36-11
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 37-07
▲ 阮元: 《揅經室集》, 四部叢刊, 二集卷四, folio 6
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 37-27
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 37-76
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 38-69
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 39-42
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 39-50
▲ 王光汉: 《庐州方言考释》, 合肥: 安徽大学出版社, 2008.12, ISBN 978-7-81110-528-5, p. 71
The variant of U+259C2 𥧂.
▲ 陈国宾: 《吴方言中的冷僻本意字》, 苏州: 古吴轩出版社, 2016.5, ISBN 978-7-5546-0679-7, pp. 45-46
▲ 翁寿元: 《无锡、苏州、常熟方言本字和词语释义》, 苏州: 苏州大学出版社, 2014.12, ISBN 978-7-5672-1159-9, pp. 173-174
▲ 李时珍: 《本草纲目 全手绘彩图典藏本 下》, 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2016.6, ISBN 978-7-5067-7955-5, p. 2094
▲ 裘庆元: 《珍本医书集成 精校本 3》, 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2016.7, ISBN 978-7-5067-8513-6, p. 1164
▲ 邹俪笙: 《外治寿世方》//裘庆元: 《珍本医书集成 （第三册） 方书类》, 北京: 中国中医药出版社, 1999.1, ISBN 7-80089-855-5, p. 569
▲ 邹存淦; 刘小平: 《外治寿世方》 (《明清中医临证小丛书》), 北京: 中国中医药出版社, 1992.12, ISBN 7-80089-030-9/R·031, p. 25
Some editions use 窴.
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 40-64
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 41-64
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 42-32
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 86-50
SJ/T 11239—2001, 42-36
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 42-34
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 42-42
▲ 陈刚: 《北京方言词典》, 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985.9, 统一书号 9017·1335, p. 142
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-94
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 35-60
▲ 《脂硯齋重評石頭記》, 甲戌本, 第二回 賈夫人仙逝揚州城 冷子興演說榮國府
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-09
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 17-66
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 17-13
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 17-20
▲ 張自烈: 《正字通》, 哈佛燕京圖書館藏本, 丑集卷二
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
▲ 《厦門市志》, 民國鈔本, 卷四
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 21-16
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 22-65
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-83
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 26-66
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 24-46
▲ 《汉字海》, p. 600
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 41-91
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 34-46
▲ 《廣東通志初稿》, 明嘉靖刻本, 卷四十, folio 34B
▲ 王應麟: 《玉海》, 清刻本, 卷第八十
▲ 張自烈: 《正字通》, 弘文書院刊本, 卷八, folio 58A
The variant of 舟.
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 17-07
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 30-87
Current name is 定芘屯 (广西壮族自治区崇左市扶绥县), reads as Mbanjdingbiz based on National Database for Geographical Names of China. Note: the database mentioned “ding” means 山塘, but there are no the corresponding meanings for the Zhuang words “ding”, and the 新借 reading of the Hanzi 定 is “ding” (老借 reading is “dingh”); the similar situation for “biz”, but the 新借 and 老借 readings for “芘” and “蓖” are not “biz”.
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 35-03
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 38-22
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 24-40
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 37-90
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 38-63
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 36-10
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 36-36
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 5323
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 37-20
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 37-45
▲ 牛汝辰: 《中国地名文化》, 北京: 中国华侨出版社, 1993.12, ISBN 7-80074-584-8/G·157, p. 188
▲ 浙江省地方志编纂委员会: 《宋元浙江方志集成 第8册》, 杭州: 杭州出版社, 2009.6, ISBN 978-7-80633-640-3, p. 3430
▲ 王志邦: 《南宋文献集成 第2册》 (《浙江智库 南宋全书》), 杭州: 杭州出版社, 2023.5, ISBN 978-7-5565-1609-4, p. 571
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 56-71
▲ 李洪亮: 《魏晋南北朝隐逸文学研究》, 上海: 上海三联书店, 2021.7, ISBN 978-7-5426-7197-4, p. 155
▲ 马森彪: 《中外文学名著集成 中国部分 I》, 太原: 北岳文艺出版社, 1997.10, ISBN 7-5378-1762-6, p. 478
▲ 胡旭: 《汉魏文学嬗变研究》 (《鼓浪学术书系·古典文学新视野》), 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2004.8, ISBN 7-5615-2261-4, p. 52
▲ 趙爾巽: 《清史稿》, 北京清史館刊, 卷六十一, 志三十六, 地理志一
▲ 赵尔巽: 《清史稿 2 卷25—58》, 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 1998.1, ISBN 7-206-02356-8, p. 1293
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 16-24
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 42-43
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 27-85
▲ 國史編纂委員會 日帝監視對象人物Card See WS2017-03583:KC-08373
As what I wrote under WS2017-03583, KC-08373 looks a 類化字, which is the variant of 湖, that means the left part should be Radical 130 in Comment #9055.
▲ 张庚, 郭汉城: 《中国戏曲通史（上）》 (《前海戏曲研究丛书》), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2014.4, ISBN 978-7-5039-5728-4, p. 211
▲ 张庚, 郭汉城: 《中国戏曲通史》, 北京: 中国戏剧出版社, 2006.9, ISBN 7-104-01967-7/J·846, p. 232
▲ 齐豫生, 夏于全: 《中国古典文学宝库 第63辑 南戏》 (《21世纪文库》), 延吉: 延边人民出版社, 1999.08, ISBN 7-80648-284-9, p. 50
▲ 上海辞书出版社文学鉴赏辞典编纂中心; 将星煜, 齐森华, 赵山林: 《明清传奇鉴赏辞典 新1版 上》, 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 2019.6, ISBN 978-7-5326-5324-9, pp. 74 & 76
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 231
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 120
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 17-77
▲ GB/T 8565.2—1988, 90-30
▲ the menu used in {https://m.dianping.com/shopshare/l1Yn0Pw9UTnAsVId 冯四⿰女上跷脚牛肉·非物质文化遗产店} (四川省乐山市市中区嘉兴路289号、291号、293号)
The shop account just uses 女上 as below.
▲ 小红书
▲ 冯四⿰女上跷脚牛肉·川菜(北京科荟路店) (北京市朝阳区科荟路16号)
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 26-89
▲ 《穆宗毅皇帝實録》, 卷之三百六十五
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 28-54
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 28-07
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 53-91
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 35-02
▲ 《汉字海》, p. 961
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 221
▲ 朱鶴齡: 《尚書埤傳》, 文淵閣四庫全書本, 卷末, folio 1B
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 6
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 171
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ Giúp Đọc Nôm Và Hán Việt , p. 765
(VN-F01E4)
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 258
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 24-54
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 358
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 59-62
The Zhuang reading of U+316B9 𱚹 is sux*. For the standard reading, the tone mark -x/-ч corresponds to 阳上 (John said this reading is used in Longzhou Zhuang), but the tone of 昼 should be 阴去 (-q/-ƽ). On the other hand, the middle Chinese finals (韵母) of 手 and 昼 are the same, and one 老借 reading of 手 I collected is suj; that 知母 reads as [s-]/[θ-] is very common. For common 腔词结合 rule in Cantonese Yueju Opera, Cantonese Yuequ Show and Cantonese pop songs, 阳上 (Tone 5) and 阴去 (Tone 3) could mean to the same musical scale, such as 上 (Gongche) for 平喉.
The semantic rationale of U+316B9 𱚹 in Zhuang and Tày is still NOT obvious. If it is the way like 臼 and 旧, 幺 and 么 to distinguish the meanings, the submitted glyph is acceptable; if we can not confirm this, it is better to change the glyph to match the evidence.
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 35-70
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 42
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第五
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 295
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十
▲ 《干禄字書》, 夷門廣牘本
▲ 《新集藏經音義隨函録》, 高麗藏, 大乘經音義第一之三, 大方等大集日藏經一部十卷, 第三卷
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 170
▲ 《新集藏經音義隨函録》, 高麗藏, 5, 大乘經音義第一之五, 十五帙, 𩓋, 寶雲經等二經十卷同帙, 寶雲經七卷
▲ 周德清: 《中原音韻》, 瞿氏鐵琴銅劍樓藏本
The reading is the same as 忙 and so on.
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 5537
▲ 吴敬梓: 《儒林外史》, 群玉齋, 第三十六回, folio 12A
▲ 吴敬梓: 《儒林外史》, 卧閑堂, 第三十六回, folio 13B
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 6955
▲ 王志毅: 《南曲九宫谱曲牌索引》, 北京: 中国戏剧出版社, 2021.12, ISBN 978-7-104-05184-8, p. 127
▲ 趙苕狂: 《增補曲苑金集 增補曲苑石集》 (《近代散佚戲曲文獻集成》), 太原: 山西人民出版社, 2018.3, ISBN 978-7-203-10300-4, p. 58
▲ 俞爲民, 孫蓉蓉: 《歷代曲話彙編——新編中國古典吸取論著集成 清代編 南曲九宫正始》, 合肥: 黄山書社, 2008.10, ISBN 978-7-80707-977-4, pp. 967-968
▲ 范金荣: 《歌谣·三语》 (杜启贵, 王雄一: 《朔城历史文化集成》), 北京：新华出版社, 2018.10, ISBN 978-7-5166-4346-4, p. 4
▲ 山西省朔州市朔城区滋润乡河淋～村
▲ 王惲: 《秋澗集》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷四十九
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 304
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函錄（高麗藏）·5·大乘經音義第一之五.十五帙·駒·維摩鞊經等四經十卷同帙·說無垢稱經六卷.大唐玄奘譯
▲ 黄德宽: 《古文字谱系疏证（全四册）》 (《国家社科基金成果文库》), 北京: 商务印书馆, 2007.5, ISBN 978-7-100-05471-3, p. 279
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之四
▲ 惠士奇: 《禮説》, 四庫全書, 卷五
▲ 喬中和: 《元韻譜》, 康熙刻本, 上聲, 卷二十五
▲ 《殷周金文集成引得》, p. 699
The evidence looks more like ⿰氵宷.
It looks a very important geographical term in Korean. We should take it more carefully.
▲ 《御定子史精華》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷五十三, folio 18A
The variant of 溵.
▲ 下巻』, p. 26 伴信友 1850年
▲ 落合直文 著『日本大文典』第1編, p.44-45,博文館,明27-30. 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション (参照 2023-04-24)
▲ 藤井乙男 編『操觚便覧』, p.16-17, 浜本明昇堂,明32.12. 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション (参照 2023-04-24)
The following pieces of evidence are cited from L2/24-201.
▲ 笹原宏之『日本の漢字』, 岩波新書, 2006, p.28
▲ 『興福寺延年舞式』, p11-12, 元文4(1739)年
▲ 『菅家百首解』, p.32-2, 岩田友靖
▲ 仮字本末 下巻 p.27 伴信友 1850年
▲ 瑞方 著 ほか『宝慶記聞解 : 一名・随聞記』乾,p.4,森江佐七,明11.7. 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション (参照2024-08-05)
▲ 《汉语大字第》, Edition 2, p. 1510
Another edition of 可洪音義 to support ⿰月囙 mentioned in Comment #5594.
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函錄（高麗藏）·21·賢聖集音義第七之一·觀·道地經等三經十三卷同帙·道地經一卷.川音云二卷
This page shows 䏣 and ⿰月囙 at the same time in 可洪音義.
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函錄（高麗藏）·19·小乘論音義第六之二.此冊有三十四帙·移·阿毗達磨順正理論一部八十卷.第四帙·第卅三卷
This page shows the same reading.
▲ 慧琳: 一切經音義, 大正新修大藏經事彙部, 卷第八十八, p. 2128
It is used for 姚记炒肝店(簋街店). It is very famous in Beijing.
▲ 黄道周: 《遵古本正韻石齋海篇》, 崇禎藜光堂刻本, 卷之五
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第十六
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之三
▲ 顧藹吉: 《隸辨》, 玉淵堂
▲ 處觀: 《紹興重雕大藏音》, 清刻本, 卷上
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
▲ 《汉语大字典》, Edition 2, p. 1052
▲ 《麋研齋作篆通假》, 稿本, 卷上
▲ 常維楨: 《萬載縣志》, 康熙刻本, 卷之十四
▲ 王鐸: 《擬山園選集》, 順治刻本, 卷之三十九
▲ 《汉语大字典》（第二版）, p. 474
▲ 《龍龕手鏡》, 高麗本, 卷第二
▲ 《龍龕手鑑》, 續古逸叢書, 卷第二
▲ 《龍龕手鑑》, 朝鮮本, 卷第四
▲ 《龍龕手鑑》, 早稻田大學藏本, 卷第二上
▲ 《龍龕手鏡》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷第二
The above two pieces of evidence match the current IDS ⿰土𢇛.
▲ 異體字字典
▲ 張自烈: 《正字通》, 哈佛燕京圖書館藏本, 子集卷一
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第五
▲ 《集韻》, 金州軍刻宋本, 卷之五
▲ 《字學三正》, 明萬曆辛丑年刻本, 第一册
▲ 《汉语大字典》, Edition 2, p. 1955
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之三
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第二十二
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十七
▲ 宋濂, 張嘉和: 《篇海類編》, 明刻本, 卷之四
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第一
▲ 李登: 《重刊詳校篇海》, 燕京藏萬曆刻本, 卷之五
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第七
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之十七
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第二十六
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十
▲ 董誥: 《全唐文》, 清嘉慶内府刻本, 卷三百四十六, folio 8A
▲ 《東西洋考每月統計傳》, 1835.3, folio 32A
▲ 陳凌千: 《潮汕字典》, 汕頭: 育新書社, 1935, p. 67
▲ 江昉: 《練溪漁唱》, 清刻本, 卷之上, folio 14B
▲ 廣漢和辭典, first edition, p. 966
▲ 《汉语大字典》, Edition 2, p. 956
▲ 《龍龕手鑑》, 早稻田大學藏本, 卷第一
▲ 廣漢和辭典, 初版, 中卷, p. 1146
▲ 李登: 《重刊詳校篇海》, 燕京藏萬曆刻本, 卷之四
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之十五
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第二十九
▲ 吴任臣: 《續字彙補》, 和刻本, 午集
▲ 林芳聲: 《沙漠的緑林》//《東方雜誌》, 第24卷, 1927.7.25, Num.14, p. 117
The variant of 凝.
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 512
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 十一卷
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之三
▲ 《龍龕手鑑》, 續古逸叢書, 平聲卷第二
▲ 《龍龕手鑑》, 早稻田大學藏本, 卷二下
▲ 《明孝宗敬皇帝實録》, 紅格鈔本, 卷一百八十七
▲ 何宝善: 《明实录长城史料》, 北京: 北京燕山出版社, 2014.12, ISBN 978-7-5402-3637-3, p. 143
This evidence shows the simplified form ⿰石啬.
▲ 《重修天津府志》, 光緒刻本, 卷五十四, folio 6A
▲ 阮秉: 《五千字譯國語》, 第二十一寳玉, folio 25B
Vietnamese: khâu
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 194
▲ HKSCS-1999
But, in GCCS, v2.0, the glyph for 0x9F60 is shown as below.
▲ GCCS, v2.0
Also included in Adobe-CNS1.
▲ Adobe-CNS1 C+16155
▲ 張景祁, 黃錦燦: 《光緒福安縣志》, 光緒刻本, 卷之三十一
the variant of 别/別
▲ 《欽定越史通鑑綱目》, 阮朝國史館, 正編, 卷之四十七
▲ 《世醫得效方》, 四庫本, 卷三, folio 11A
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十四
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 502
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
▲ 《汉字海》, p. 316
▲ GB 18030—2022 Amd.1 Draft 1
▲ 个人所得税app
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之三
▲ 《漢語大字典》, Edition 2, p. 2833
▲ 施宿: 《嘉泰會稽志》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷十
▲ 施宿: 《嘉泰會稽志》, 清嘉慶刻本, 卷十, 新昌縣
The modern edition uses 坑 as below.
▲ 萧良幹; 张元忭, 孙𰽚; 李能成; 绍兴市委党史研究室, 绍兴市地方志办公室: 《万历〈绍兴府志〉点校本》 (《绍兴史志文化丛书 第二辑》), 宁波: 宁波出版社, 2012.7, ISBN 978-7-5526-0329-3, p. 179
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之六
▲ 王鏊: 《震澤集》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷五, folio 10B
The text of the poem is shown below.
宣廟畫猫歌
禁柳疏疏還密密 狸奴稳卧堦前日
日長睡起鳴一聲 掉尾欲行還不行
先皇爲愛馴且異 呼之即來麾即逝
偶然點綴為寫生 ⿺毛不毸毛衣獅子形
絳羅垂垂鈴索索 目光耽耽透簾箔
縱然未解起捕鼠 鼠輩見之應膽落
In this poem, ⿺毛不 is the variant of 毰.
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 276
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十七
▲ 羅貫中: 《三國志通俗演義》, 嘉靖元年刻本, 卷之十三, folio 63
The person mentioned in the above evidence is 姜叙.
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 275
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 19
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 35
▲ 《第二次汉字简化方案》
▲ 陳子龍: 《皇明經世文編》, 明崇禎平露堂刻本, 卷之一百四十九, folio 9B
The variant of 釜.
▲ 董誥: 《全唐文》, 清嘉慶内府刻本, 卷六百九, 劉禹錫, folio 18A
▲ 劉禹錫: 《劉賓客外集》, 四庫全書, 卷九, folio 13B
The alternative variant is 昕.
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之八
▲ 《魏書》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷一百六下
▲ 方文照: 《徐仙真籙》, 續道藏, 卷之二
▲ 施謝捷: 《古璽彙考》, p. 204
▲ 《集韻》, 金州軍刻宋本, 卷之二
▲ 《集韻》, 萬有文庫影印日本天保九年重刊顧廣圻補刻本, 卷之二
▲ 《集韻》, 錢恂藏揚州使院本, 卷之二
The alternative variant is 崹.
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第二十
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之二十
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 85
▲ 處觀: 《紹興重雕大藏音》, 清刻本, 卷中
▲ 曾慥: 《類説》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷二十六, folio 21B
The variant of 杴
▲ 个人所得税app, PRC
▲ GB 18030—2022 AMD.1 Draft 1
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 304
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函錄（高麗藏）·5·大乘經音義第一之五.十五帙·駒·維摩鞊經等四經十卷同帙·說無垢稱經六卷.大唐玄奘譯
▲ 《方輿彙編職方典第九百八十八卷紹興府部》, 古今圖書集成, Book 138, p. 6
▲ 《三晋文字編》, 吉林大學, 2009, 卷十三, p. 787
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十六
▲ 竹林君士: 《佛教難字字典》, 常春樹書坊, 1988, p. 226
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函録, 高麗藏, 大乘經音義第一之五, 十五帙, 鳳, 方廣大㽵嚴經下帙兩卷二經十卷同帙, 第十二卷
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 322
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 37
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之七
▲ 《汉字海》, p. 325
▲ 李登: 《重刊詳校篇海》, 燕京藏萬曆刻本, 卷之二
▲ 《重刊詳校篇海》, 燕京藏順治刻本, 二卷前册
▲ 《清史稿》, 北京清史館刊, 卷二百二十, 表五十三, 交聘年表下
▲ 鄭賢章: 《漢文佛典疑難俗字彙集與研究》, 成都: 巴蜀書社, 2016.6, ISBN 978-7-5531-0700-4, p. 144
(Could be GHF-0321.)
▲ 个人所得税app, PRC
▲ GB 18030—2022 AMD.1 Draft 1
▲ 《汉语大字典》, Edition 2, p. 2127
▲ 《龍龕手鏡》, 高麗本, 平聲卷第一
▲ 《改併五音類聚四聲篇海》, 明萬曆己丑本, 卷三
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第二十三
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 日藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第一
The variant of 家
▲ 李曾伯: 《可齋續稿後》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷十二, folio 31B
The alternative variant of 琦.
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函録（高麗藏）, 賢聖集音義第七之八, 辯正論一部八卷, 大唐終南山龍田寺沙門釋法琳撰, 第七
▲ 處觀: 《紹興重雕大藏音》, 清刻本, 卷上, folio 15A
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第三
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十八
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 244
▲ GCCS, v2.0 (H-9FDA)
▲ Adobe-CNS1 C+16237
▲ 處觀: 《紹興重雕大藏音》, 清刻本, 宀部第九
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之六
▲ 徐象梅: 《兩浙名賢録》, 清光緒刻本, 卷之四
▲ 王銍: 《雪溪集》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷二
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 169
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 360
▲ 《汉语大字典（第二版）》, p. 2607
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 349
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之三
▲ Tự Điển Chữ Nôm Dẫn Giải on VNPF
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第六
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之三
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第二十二
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十七
▲ 中国艺术研究院音乐研究所: 《李纯一全集（全6卷）》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2024.4, ISBN 978-7-5039-7469-4, 第2卷 《中国上古出土乐器综论·下》, p. 47
▲ 羅玘; 黃端伯: 《羅圭峰文集》, 康熙刻本, 卷十五
I think the right part ⿱革一 could be unified with 堇 here.
▲ 譚處端: 《水雲集》, 明刻本, 卷上, folio 14B
▲ 譚處端: 《水雲集》, 正統道藏, 卷上
The text of this poem shows below.
遊懷川 譚處端
雲耕寶陸三千里 [平平仄仄平平仄]
月破黄昏十萬家 [仄仄平平仄仄平/韻]
清夜碧潭澄皎潔 [平仄仄平平仄仄]
蚌吞銀～産胎砂 [仄平平仄仄平平/韻]
It is very easy to know the tone of this character must be 仄 not 平.
Other version shows 焰, which matches 仄.
▲ 顧嗣立: 《元詩選》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 二集, 卷二十五, folio 3A
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 148
▲ 王守仁; 《文白对照王阳明全集》编委会: 《文白对照王阳明全集 三》, 北京: 团结出版社, 2020.10, ISBN 978-7-5126-7251-2, p. 1154
▲ 邓凯: 《王阳明年谱校注》, 宁波: 宁波出版社, 2019.6, ISBN 978-7-5526-3595-9, p. 113
▲ 陈刚: 《北京方言词典》, 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985.9, 统一书号 9017·1335, p. 90
▲ 汪森; 黄振中, 吴中任, 梁超然: 《粤西叢載校註（中册）》, 南寧: 廣西民族出版社, 2007.12, ISBN 978-7-5363-5426-5/Z·614, p. 738
The submitted glyph form matches this evidence of the modern publication.
▲ 鄭賢章: 《漢文佛典疑難俗字彙集與研究》, 成都: 巴蜀書社, 2016.6, ISBN 978-7-5531-0700-4, p. 53
(Could be GHF-0010.)
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 88-11
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 7134
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 86-91
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 427
▲ 董斯张: 《吴兴备志》, 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 2021.11, ISBN 978-7-5540-1665-7, p. 323
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第六
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 《改併五音類聚四聲篇海》, 明萬曆己丑本, 卷二
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之二
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 16-84
▲ 『承政院日記』 1389冊 123b(正祖 0年 9月 26日 18記事)
The above evidence is cited from WS2024-00160.
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 17-36
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 24-43
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 25-07
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 31-69
▲ 鄭賢章: 《漢文佛典疑難俗字彙集與研究》, 成都: 巴蜀書社, 2016.6, ISBN 978-7-5531-0700-4, p. 123
(Could be GHF-0249.)
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 56-71
▲ 李洪亮: 《魏晋南北朝隐逸文学研究》, 上海: 上海三联书店, 2021.7, ISBN 978-7-5426-7197-4, p. 155
▲ 马森彪: 《中外文学名著集成 中国部分 I》, 太原: 北岳文艺出版社, 1997.10, ISBN 7-5378-1762-6, p. 478
▲ 胡旭: 《汉魏文学嬗变研究》 (《鼓浪学术书系·古典文学新视野》), 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2004.8, ISBN 7-5615-2261-4, p. 52
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 51-84
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 350
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 356
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 56-55
▲ 曹雪芹; 杨义: 《红楼梦精华笺证 第二卷》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2021.7, ISBN 978-7-5039-6529-6, p. 1289
▲ 《學生粵英詞典》, 紐約, 1947, p. 84
▲ 趙苕狂: 《勳章雨》, 《紅雜志》, 1923, V.1, Num.43, p. 32
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 10
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 6955
▲ 王志毅: 《南曲九宫谱曲牌索引》, 北京: 中国戏剧出版社, 2021.12, ISBN 978-7-104-05184-8, p. 127
▲ 趙苕狂: 《增補曲苑金集 增補曲苑石集》 (《近代散佚戲曲文獻集成》), 太原: 山西人民出版社, 2018.3, ISBN 978-7-203-10300-4, p. 58
▲ 俞爲民, 孫蓉蓉: 《歷代曲話彙編——新編中國古典吸取論著集成 清代編 南曲九宫正始》, 合肥: 黄山書社, 2008.10, ISBN 978-7-80707-977-4, pp. 967-968
▲ 范金荣: 《歌谣·三语》 (杜启贵, 王雄一: 《朔城历史文化集成》), 北京：新华出版社, 2018.10, ISBN 978-7-5166-4346-4, p. 4
▲ 山西省朔州市朔城区滋润乡河淋～村
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 小宫山博史; 孙明远: 《绘写文字——字体设计的基础》//孙明远: 《方寸之间——汉字文字设计文集》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.5, ISBN 978-7-5039-7395-6, p. 355
▲ 大原望: 和製漢字の辞典, 2014
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 235
▲ 黄道周: 《遵古本正韻石齋海篇》, 崇禎藜光堂刻本, 九卷
▲ 《合併字學集篇》, 明萬曆刻本, 卷之一
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 615
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
Attached PDF file
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 614
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 615
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 616
▲ 田青: 《幽兰春晓——“古琴艺术”申遗二十周年纪念文集》 (A Commemorative Compilation. Celebrating 20 Years of Guqin Art’s UNESCO Recognition), 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.11, ISBN 978-7-5039-7497-7, p. 615
▲ ホキノ山公園 in Kagoshima Prefecture (鹿児島県)
▲ ホキノ山公園 in Kagoshima Prefecture (鹿児島県)
The address is 鹿児島県南さつま市笠沙町片浦９９０.
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 24-45
▲ 《改併五音類聚四聲篇海》, 明萬曆己丑本, 卷二
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第一
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 40-64
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 7134
▲ 全国教育学院师专古汉语教学研究会: 《古代汉语 下册》, 太原: 山西人民出版社, 1986.5, 统一书号 9088·54, p. 397
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 39-12
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 86-82
▲ GB/T 7589—1987, 88-73
▲ 徐州市史志办公室, 江苏师范大学汉文化研究院, 赵明奇: 《点校本徐州古方志丛书（全6册）》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2024.7, ISBN 978-7-5039-7615-5, p. 2564
▲ NPCT, V2.1
▲ NPCT, V1.0
▲ KCHN
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
▲ 个人所得税app, PRC
▲ GB 18030—2022 AMD.1 Draft 1
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 165
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ 阮秉: 《五千字譯國語》, folio 61B
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ KCHN
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第一
▲ Character code system used by the Supreme Court of South Korea
▲ 倪濤: 《六藝之一録》, 文淵閣, 卷二百二十九
▲ 《金石文字辨異．去聲．嘯韻．弔字》引〈漢相張壽碑〉
▲ 杜佑: 《通典》, 武英殿本, 卷一百五十六
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函錄（高麗藏）·1·大乘經音義第一之一·芥·放光般若經一部三十卷.第三帙·第二十一卷
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 304
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函錄（高麗藏）·5·大乘經音義第一之五.十五帙·駒·維摩鞊經等四經十卷同帙·說無垢稱經六卷.大唐玄奘譯
▲ 《龍龕手鑑》, 早稻田大學藏本, 卷第一
▲ 正統道藏·洞眞部·譜籙類·元始高上玉檢大錄·騰五
Used for the name of 紫清西華高上虛皇道君
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 84
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 328
Evidence 1 shows ⿰火⿸𠂆㇯𧘇丿, Evidence 2 shows ⿰火⿸𠂆氏. The semantic rationales showed on the evidences support the normalization.
Evidence 1 shows the left part is 火 (hoả), the right part is half of 派 (phái). [从火派省聲]
Evidence 2 shows the left part is 火 (hoả), the right part is 𠂢 (phái). [从火𠂢省聲]
New evidence also supports the current glyph.
▲ 《中国京语词典》, p. 245
▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 39-06
▲ 《原本玉篇殘卷》, 黎本玉篇, 卷九
The variant of 讟.
▲ GB/T 5790—1987, 57-43
▲ 李昉; 刘素琴, 曾凤: 《奇人异事》 (《〈太平广记〉故事集》), 北京: 北京广播学院出版社, 1999.1, ISBN 7-81004-705-1/I·81, p. 360
▲ 林芳聲: 《沙漠的緑林》//《東方雜誌》, 第24卷, 1927.7.25, Num.14, p. 117
The variant of 凝.
▲ 黄道周: 《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》, 明崇禎刻本, 卷之三
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十七
▲ 黄道周: 《遵古本正韻石齋海篇》, 崇禎藜光堂刻本, 卷之十五
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十六
▲ 邢准: 《新修絫音引證群籍玉篇》, 金刻本, 卷第一
▲ 杜臺卿: 《玉燭寶典》, 古逸叢書景日本鈔卷子本, 卷第六
▲ 《續文獻通考》, 明萬曆刻本, 卷二百三十八
▲ 李登: 《重刊詳校篇海》, 燕京藏萬曆刻本, 卷之四
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之首
▲ 吴任臣: 《續字彙補》, 和刻本, 卯集
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第二
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之十四
The variant of 弄.
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第一
▲ 新集藏經音義隨函錄（高麗藏）·21·賢聖集音義第七之一·觀·道地經等三經十三卷同帙·修行道地經七卷
▲ 梁冠廷, 熊道儿: 《粤剧小曲集》, 广州: 广东省粤剧院艺术室, 1982, p. 28
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 10
▲ 何紹基: 《重修安徽通志》, 光緒刻本, 卷三百十三, folio 15A
▲ 石川啄木; 周作人: 《两条的血痕》//《東方雜誌》, 第19卷 1922.8.10, No. 15, p. 113
The variant of 烫/燙.
The above is the clearer evidence.
▲ 李長春: 《明熹宗七年都察院實録》, 清鈔本, 卷之十
▲ 朱駿聲: 《春秋左傳識小録》, 清光緒刻本, 卷下, folio 16A
▲ 鄭珍: 《説文逸字》, 咸豐八年刻本, 卷下, folio 24B
▲ 《重刊詳校篇海》, 燕京藏順治刻本, 二卷後册
The variant of 𤻘.
▲ 陳景沂: 《全芳備祖前集》, 文淵閣四庫全書, 卷二十, folio 5B
▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》, 日内閣文庫藏本, 卷之一
▲ 怀集县政协文史资料委员会 下帅壮族瑶族乡人民政府. 怀集文史 第13辑 下帅民族史料专辑. 1996, p. 1
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 493
▲ 覃家道, 王定才: 《布依方块古文字》, 北京: 民族出版社, 2020.8, ISBN 978-7-105-16099-0, p. 176
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 311
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 314
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 322
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 284
▲ 高然, 张燕翔: 《现代粤语口语（提高篇）》 (《高博士现代汉语方言系列丛书》), 广州: 世界图书出版广东有限公司, 2016.1, ISBN 978-7-5192-0495-2/H·1003, pp. 71-72
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 21 comments.
See below.
There is no K-Source under 戬, but K1-6B79 is under 戩.
Has the glyph been normalized?
Does TCA plan to normalize the glyph if possible?
See U+8794 螔, U+892B 褫, U+8B15 謕, U+29E9B 𩺛 and so on.
There are no V-Source reference for U+6E7C 湼 and U+23D40 𣵀.
Vietnam could do the normalization for this case, so I think the current glyph is acceptable.
Editorial
Showing 15 comments.
[WS2021-00762]
[ {{WS2017-03140}} ]
[WS2021-01439]
Note: Similar and synonym: 𰀄/ Alternate IDS: ⿾⿿亾
It is better to keep them separately.
▲ L.m. Trần Văn Kiệm. Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt. Đà Nẵng, 2004, p. 535
The above page shows several characters related to the top component 䄪, all of them should be unified to 𥝢 as the top component, such as...
U+68C3 棃 vs ⿱䄪木
U+7282 犂 vs ⿱䄪牛
U+9ECE 黎 V1-6D2E vs ⿱䄪𱥯
U+74C8 瓈 vs ⿰王⿱䄪𱥯
U+853E 蔾 vs ⿳艹䄪木
However, there is only U+9ECE 黎 has the V-Source reference and the top component shows 𥝢 not 䄪.
Maybe we need to make something.
Solution 1:
Modify the glyph and IDS for this character to ⿰石棃.
Do the V-Source horizontal extensions for U+68C3 棃, U+7282 犂, U+74C8 瓈, U+853E 蔾 like 黎 in future.
Solution 2:
Change V1-6D2E glyph for U+9ECE 黎 to ⿱䄪𱥯.
Treat ⿱䄪X as Vietnam/VNPF convention.
Do the V-Source horizontal extensions for U+68C3 棃, U+7282 犂, U+74C8 瓈, U+853E 蔾 as ⿱䄪木, ⿱䄪牛, ⿰王⿱䄪𱥯, ⿳艹䄪木 in future.
Change IDS for this character to ⿰石棃, but keep the glyph.
Other
Showing 78 comments.
But, the current draft of the new version of GB/T 22321.1 shows the glyph like the code chart.
It is better to encode them separately to make everyone more easily.
▲ p. 7 of IRG N2119
▲ p. 2 of IRG N2747
If China’s request to change the G glyph for U+2CD98 𬶘 back to the previous one, this character should be withdrawn by China in future.
▲ 严可均: 《全后汉文 下》 (《国学基本经典》), 北京: 商务印书馆, 1999.10, ISBN 7-100-02934-1, p. 592
▲ 《汉语方言大词典》, p. 715
U+31A4A 𱩊
U+2ADEB 𪷫
U+2AB2C 𪬬
U+2A926 𪤦
U+2ECD5 𮳕
U+9FFF 鿿
The current RS and TS matches KC-06763 ⿱艹装.
GB 18030—2022 also matches KC-06763 ⿱艹装.
It looks it is better to disunify SAT-03743 ⿱艹裝 to a new code point as UNC, RS=145.11, TS=17, FS=2. We also need to check if there are other similar issues.
▲ 管平湖: 《管平湖古琴曲集（增訂版）》 Favourite Qin Pieces of Guan Ping hu ), 香港: 龍音製作有限公司 (ROI Productions Ltd.), 2016, RS 161008 4C, pp. 45 & 47
KC-07234.
The kFanqie property value for 悶 is 莫困, and the evidences show the fanqie is 鄙～.
悶: 明母臻攝魂韻合口一等去聲 (被切字)
莫: 明母宕攝唐韻開口一等入聲 (反切上字)
困: 溪母臻攝魂韻合口一等去聲 (反切下字)
That means the fanqie matches the character 悶.
However, 鄙 is 幫母 and 三等, that means the reading of character 被切字 should be 齐齿呼. 幫母 and 明母 are not totally the same.
鄙: 幫母止攝脂韻開口三等上聲 (反切上字)
At least, the submitted character should be as below.
？母臻攝魂韻合口三等(?)去聲 (反切下字)
The kFanqie property value for 閟 is 兵媚.
閟: 幫母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (被切字)
兵: 幫母梗攝庚韻開口三等平聲 (反切上字)
媚: 明母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (反切下字)
And the usage of 鄙 is the same as 兵 as the shengmu (声母), that means the submitted character should be as below.
？母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲
On the other hand, 異 is shown as below. (羊吏切)
以母止攝之韻開口三等去聲
脂韻 and 之韻 are very close in middle Chinese, so we can guess the submitted character should be as below.
以母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (Putonghua reading: yì)
That means the unification request on Comment #8 is also acceptable.
縮 生母通攝東韻三等開口入聲 被切字
所 生母遇攝魚韻三等開口上聲 反切上字
六 來母通攝東韻三等開口入聲 反切下字
陸 來母通攝東韻三等開口入聲 反切下字
So, we can get the information of this character as below.
生母？攝？韻三等開口？聲
The information of 𢯱 is shown as below.
𢯱 生母流攝攝韻三等開口平聲
It is OK to accept it is the variant of 𢯱.
VN-F17B2 could be unified here in future.
[WS2021-00651]
▲ 中国人民政治协商会议峨山彝族自治县委员会文史资料委员会. 峨山彝族自治县文史资料选辑 第3辑[M]. 1990, p. 125
The above picture shows this character reads as 楚 by the modern people. 张公堤 in current 峨山县 is related to him. See here.
▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 漢和藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第一
⿰土蒦 is also KC-10600.
Data for Unihan
Showing 196 comments.
WS2024-00961 ⿰土翰
WS2024-00961 ⿰土翰
The modern edition uses 崄. The Cantonese reading of 嶮/崄 is also him2.
▲ 邵陆; 酉阳自治县档案局: 《酉阳州志》, 成都: 巴蜀出版社, 2010.6, ISBN 978-7-80752-597-4, p. 101
WS2024-00952 ⿰土斡
[WS2021-00856]
[WS2021-00891]
[WS2021-00874]
[WS2021-00804]
To follow U+30DAF 𰶯, no *.
kSpoofingVariant U+4F61 佡
The right part is the variant of 與.
There is no voiced consonant in Cantonese phonology, so the consonant [b] was read as [m] at that time.
kZhuang ceih*
kFanqie 冀尺
The original form of this Cantonese word is 踩/跴.
kFanqie 苦頂
kFanqie 所講
Based on Evidence 3
The common Cantonese reading of 拂 is fat6, but this character should read as fik6 (the literary reading of -ek is -ik commonly).
kFanqie 路𡩖
kCantonese naat3
kCantonese ceon1
kJapanese トウ
(also lim2)